{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T23:24:48Z","timestamp":1787095488628,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,8]],"date-time":"2026-06-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1780876800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,19]],"date-time":"2026-08-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1787097600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":72,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Rep"],"DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-026-57100-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,8]],"date-time":"2026-06-08T02:45:54Z","timestamp":1780886754000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Transperineal ultrasonography assisted examination improves maternal and neonatal outcomes of forceps delivery: a propensity-score-matched analysis"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"16","author":[{"given":"Shin","family":"Hashiramoto","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hiroko","family":"Takita","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tatsuya","family":"Arakaki","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yuka","family":"Yamashita","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mayumi","family":"Kaneko","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ryu","family":"Matsuoka","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Akihiko","family":"Sekizawa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,8]]},"reference":[{"issue":"9","key":"57100_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1365","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14553","volume":"124","author":"AA Merriam","year":"2017","unstructured":"Merriam, A. A. et al. Trends in operative vaginal delivery, 2005\u20132013: A population-based study. BJOG 124 (9), 1365\u20131372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.14553 (2017).","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"57100_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.03.008","volume":"157","author":"J Unterscheider","year":"2011","unstructured":"Unterscheider, J., McMenamin, M. & Cullinane, F. Rising rates of caesarean deliveries at full cervical dilatation: A concerning trend. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 157 (2), 141\u2013144. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.03.008 (2011).","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol."},{"issue":"3","key":"57100_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2018.06.018","volume":"41","author":"GM Muraca","year":"2019","unstructured":"Muraca, G. M. et al. Morbidity and mortality associated with forceps and vacuum delivery at outlet, low, and midpelvic station. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 41 (3), 327\u2013337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogc.2018.06.018 (2019).","journal-title":"J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can."},{"issue":"6","key":"57100_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14820","volume":"125","author":"GM Muraca","year":"2018","unstructured":"Muraca, G. M. et al. Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality among term singletons following midcavity operative vaginal delivery versus caesarean delivery. BJOG 125 (6), 693\u2013702. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.14820 (2018).","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"6","key":"57100_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1265","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001156","volume":"126","author":"TL Halscott","year":"2015","unstructured":"Halscott, T. L. et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes by attempted mode of operative delivery from a low station in the second stage of labor. Obstet. Gynecol. 126 (6), 1265\u20131272. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001156 (2015).","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"5","key":"57100_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"638e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.11.007","volume":"214","author":"JL Bailit","year":"2016","unstructured":"BailitJL et al. Evaluation of delivery options for second-stage events. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 214 (5), 638e1\u2013638e10. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.11.007 (2016).","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"57100_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1516","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12363","volume":"120","author":"I Gurol-Urganci","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gurol-Urganci, I. et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: Time trends and risk factors. BJOG 120, 1516\u20131525. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.12363 (2013).","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"57100_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2009.01060.x","volume":"49","author":"R Al-Suhel","year":"2009","unstructured":"Al-Suhel, R., Gill, S., Robson, S. & Shadbolt, B. Kjelland\u2019s forceps in the new millennium. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted rotational forceps delivery. Aust N Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 49, 510\u2013514. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2009.01060.x (2009).","journal-title":"Aust N Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"issue":"7","key":"57100_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"811","DOI":"10.15537\/1658-3175.1760","volume":"23","author":"RA Mesleh","year":"2002","unstructured":"Mesleh, R. A., Al-Sawadi, H. M. & Kurdi, A. M. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries. Saudi Med. J. 23 (7), 811\u2013813 (2002).","journal-title":"Saudi Med. J."},{"issue":"1","key":"57100_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E1","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.210841","volume":"194","author":"GM Muraca","year":"2022","unstructured":"Muraca, G. M. et al. Maternal and neonatal trauma following operative vaginal delivery. CMAJ 194 (1), E1\u2013E12. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1503\/cmaj.210841 (2022).","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"issue":"2","key":"57100_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1002\/ajum.12121","volume":"22","author":"S Usman","year":"2019","unstructured":"Usman, S. et al. Time to delivery based on sonographic assessment prior to forceps and vacuum. Australas J. Ultrasound Med. 22 (2), 111\u2013117. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ajum.12121 (2019).","journal-title":"Australas J. Ultrasound Med."},{"key":"57100_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610220141227","volume":"22","author":"DS Weerasekera","year":"2002","unstructured":"Weerasekera, D. S. & Premaratne, S. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 22, 344\u2013345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01443610220141227 (2002).","journal-title":"J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"issue":"17","key":"57100_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2146","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics15172146","volume":"15","author":"E Dagdeviren","year":"2025","unstructured":"Dagdeviren, E. et al. Comparative assessment of uterocervical angle using transvaginal, transabdominal, and transperineal ultrasonography between 16 and 24 weeks of gestation. Diagnostics 15 (17), 2146. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/diagnostics15172146 (2025).","journal-title":"Diagnostics"},{"key":"57100_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.014","volume":"228","author":"E Dagdeviren","year":"2018","unstructured":"Dagdeviren, E. et al. Can uterocervical angles successfully predict induction of labor in nulliparous women? Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 228, 87\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.014 (2018).","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol."},{"issue":"7","key":"57100_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.5603\/gpl.102956","volume":"96","author":"C Tercan","year":"2025","unstructured":"Tercan, C. et al. The role of uterine anteversion and flexion angles in predicting pain severity during diagnostic hysteroscopy: A prospective cohort study. Ginekol. Pol. 96 (7), 524\u2013531. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5603\/gpl.102956 (2025).","journal-title":"Ginekol. Pol."},{"issue":"1","key":"57100_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19072","volume":"52","author":"T Ghi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ghi, T. et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: Intrapartum ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 52 (1), 128\u2013139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.19072 (2018).","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"3","key":"57100_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6336","volume":"33","author":"L Yeo","year":"2009","unstructured":"Yeo, L. & Romero, R. Sonographic evaluation in the second stage of labor to improve the assessment of labor progress and its outcome. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 33 (3), 253\u2013258. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.6336 (2009).","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"1","key":"57100_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02775.x","volume":"118","author":"B Tutschek","year":"2011","unstructured":"Tutschek, B., Braun, T., Chantraine, F. & Henrich, W. A study of progress of labour using intrapartum translabial ultrasound, assessing head station, direction, and angle of descent. BJOG 118 (1), 62\u201369. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02775.x (2011).","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"4","key":"57100_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101345","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101345","volume":"6","author":"SM Skinner","year":"2024","unstructured":"Skinner, S. M. et al. The use of intrapartum ultrasound in operative vaginal birth: A retrospective cohort study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. MFM. 6 (4), 101345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2024.101345 (2024).","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. MFM"},{"issue":"12","key":"57100_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1490","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13230","volume":"96","author":"JA Sainz","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sainz, J. A. et al. Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound used to predict cases of complicated operative (vacuum and forceps) deliveries in nulliparous women. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 96 (12), 1490\u20131497. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.13230 (2017).","journal-title":"Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand."},{"issue":"1","key":"57100_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028","volume":"224","author":"L Hinkson","year":"2021","unstructured":"Hinkson, L., Henrich, W. & Tutschek, B. Intrapartum ultrasound during rotational forceps delivery: A novel tool for safety, quality control, and teaching. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 224 (1), 93e1\u201393e7. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.07.028 (2021).","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"3","key":"57100_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.24886","volume":"60","author":"A Nassr","year":"2022","unstructured":"Nassr, A. et al. Angle of progression measured using transperineal ultrasound for prediction of uncomplicated operative vaginal delivery: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 60 (3), 338\u2013345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.24886 (2022).","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"11","key":"57100_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1941","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14236","volume":"100","author":"I Mappa","year":"2021","unstructured":"Mappa, I. et al. Ultrasound vs routine care before instrumental vaginal delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 100 (11), 1941\u20131948. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.14236 (2021).","journal-title":"Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand."},{"issue":"6","key":"57100_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1075","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14065","volume":"100","author":"JG Barros","year":"2021","unstructured":"Barros, J. G. et al. Transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound vs routine care before instrumental vaginal delivery - A randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 100 (6), 1075\u20131081. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.14065 (2021).","journal-title":"Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand."},{"key":"57100_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"699","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19091","volume":"52","author":"T Ghi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ghi, T. et al. Randomised Italian sonography for occiput POSition trial ante vacuum (R.I.S.POS.T.A). Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 52, 699\u2013705. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.19091 (2018).","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"11","key":"57100_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1475","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.17838","volume":"131","author":"CT Mentzoni","year":"2024","unstructured":"Mentzoni, C. T., Klungs\u00f8yr, K. & Engjom, H. M. Trends in severe postpartum haemorrhage among nulliparous women with spontaneous onset of labour: A population-based cohort study. BJOG 131 (11), 1475\u20131483. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.17838 (2024).","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"3","key":"57100_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6329","volume":"33","author":"AF Barbera","year":"2009","unstructured":"Barbera, A. F., Pombar, X., Perugino, G., Lezotte, D. C. & Hobbins, J. C. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 33 (3), 313\u2013319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.6329 (2009).","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"6","key":"57100_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"753","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.3848","volume":"28","author":"W Henrich","year":"2006","unstructured":"Henrich, W., Dudenhausen, J., Fuchs, I., Kamena, A. & Tutschek, B. Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): Sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 28 (6), 753\u2013760. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.3848 (2006).","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"3","key":"57100_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6313","volume":"33","author":"T Ghi","year":"2009","unstructured":"Ghi, T. et al. Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 33 (3), 331\u2013336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.6313 (2009).","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"1","key":"57100_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.34763\/jmotherandchild.20232701.d-23-00057","volume":"27","author":"K Zaj\u0105c","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zaj\u0105c, K., Rybnik, M., K\u0119siak, M. & Kalinka, J. Is There still a place for forceps delivery in modern obstetrics? J. Mother. Child. 27 (1), 176\u2013181. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.34763\/jmotherandchild.20232701.d-23-00057 (2023).","journal-title":"J. Mother. Child."},{"issue":"6","key":"57100_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"610","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.01463.x","volume":"110","author":"DJ Murphy","year":"2003","unstructured":"Murphy, D. J., Liebling, R. E., Patel, R., Verity, L. & Swingler, R. Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care. BJOG 110 (6), 610\u2013615 (2003).","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"5","key":"57100_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0039-1683439","volume":"37","author":"ES Miller","year":"2020","unstructured":"Miller, E. S. et al. Duration of Operative Vaginal Delivery and Adverse Obstetric Outcomes. Am. J. Perinatol. 37 (5), 503\u2013510. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0039-1683439 (2020).","journal-title":"Am. J. Perinatol."},{"issue":"3","key":"57100_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00656.x","volume":"19","author":"DM Sherer","year":"2002","unstructured":"Sherer, D. M., Miodovnik, M., Bradley, K. S. & Langer, O. Intrapartum fetal head position II: Comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 19 (3), 264\u2013268. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00656.x (2002).","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"2","key":"57100_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.04.009","volume":"123","author":"O Dupuis","year":"2005","unstructured":"Dupuis, O. et al. Fetal head position during the second stage of labor: Comparison of digital vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasonographic examination. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 123 (2), 193\u2013197. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.04.009 (2005).","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol."},{"issue":"5","key":"57100_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"508","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2011.648234","volume":"25","author":"A Malvasi","year":"2012","unstructured":"Malvasi, A. et al. Intrapartum sonography for fetal head asynclitism and transverse position: Sonographic signs and comparison of diagnostic performance between transvaginal and digital examination. J. Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 25 (5), 508\u2013512. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/14767058.2011.648234 (2012).","journal-title":"J. Matern Fetal Neonatal Med."},{"issue":"1","key":"57100_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2012.06.001","volume":"164","author":"M Ramphul","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ramphul, M., Kennelly, M. & Murphy, D. J. Establishing the accuracy and acceptability of abdominal ultrasound to define the foetal head position in the second stage of labour: A validation study. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 164 (1), 35\u201339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2012.06.001 (2012).","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol."},{"issue":"7451","key":"57100_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1302","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.328.7451.1302","volume":"328","author":"RR Patel","year":"2004","unstructured":"Patel, R. R. & Murphy, D. J. Forceps delivery in modern obstetric practice. BMJ 328 (7451), 1302\u20131305. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.328.7451.1302 (2004).","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"10","key":"57100_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1059","DOI":"10.1097\/EJA.0000000000001439","volume":"38","author":"PS Au-Yong","year":"2021","unstructured":"Au-Yong, P. S. et al. Factors associated with an increased risk of instrumental vaginal delivery in women with epidural analgesia for labour: A retrospective cohort study. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 38 (10), 1059\u20131066. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/EJA.0000000000001439 (2021).","journal-title":"Eur. J. Anaesthesiol."}],"container-title":["Scientific Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-026-57100-5","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-026-57100-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-026-57100-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T22:50:22Z","timestamp":1787093422000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-026-57100-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,8]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["57100"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-026-57100-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-2322"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2045-2322","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"28 October 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 June 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 June 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Competing interests","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by the ethics committee in our hospital (approval number M3389). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethical approval","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}],"article-number":"25945"}}