{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,6]],"date-time":"2026-10-06T23:50:36Z","timestamp":1791330636059,"version":"4.3.1"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,7]],"date-time":"2026-07-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1783382400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1791331200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":92,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"The Christian Doppler Laboratory for Patient-Centered Breast Imaging"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Rep"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    Repeatable and standardized quantitative assessment of diagnostic image quality in contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is limited by the absence of realistic pseudo-anthropomorphic phantoms. We extended the L2 phantom mimicking realistic anatomical noise by integrating a plate containing 3D-printed iodine inserts of varying areal densities and diameters, enabling systematic evaluation of iodine detectability with a structured background. A key feature of the L2 phantom is the possibility to generate different background patterns by agitating the phantom. CEM images were acquired on a\n                    <jats:italic>Siemens Mammomat Revelation<\/jats:italic>\n                    system at 28\u00a0kV in TiCEM dual-energy mode with automatic exposure control. 8 readers participated in a Four-Alternative Forced Choice (4AFC) study with 12 independent acquisitions per condition, each performed after gentle phantom agitation to generate unique background configurations. Psychometric functions were fitted for each reader to determine detection thresholds set at 62.5% correct readings as a function of both cylinder diameter and iodine concentration. Detectability improved with increasing iodine content and cylinder size. Intra- and inter-reader variability decreased with higher signal conspicuity, and geometric distortion was negligible (\n                    <jats:inline-formula>\n                      <jats:tex-math>$$\\approx 0.4\\%$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                    <\/jats:inline-formula>\n                    ). As a proof-of-concept study, the thresholds determined provide quantitative benchmarks for phantom-based comparison of CEM acquisition protocols and technical performance assessment on the investigated system. Overall, the L2 phantom with the added iodine contrast detail plate, combined with the 4AFC framework, offers a promising tool for evaluating image quality and assessing iodine detectability in CEM under controlled phantom conditions.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-026-59516-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,7]],"date-time":"2026-07-07T11:07:55Z","timestamp":1783422475000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Quantitative evaluation of iodine detectability in contrast-enhanced mammography using an anthropomorphic phantom"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"16","author":[{"given":"Masar","family":"Al-Muttairi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elisabeth","family":"Salomon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Samuel","family":"Schr\u00f6ter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael","family":"Figl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Paola","family":"Clauser","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pascal A. T.","family":"Baltzer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Peter","family":"Homolka","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Johann","family":"Hummel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"59516_CR1","unstructured":"Perry, N. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis, (4th edn) (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2006)."},{"key":"59516_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4816","DOI":"10.1002\/mp.16600","volume":"50","author":"E Salomon","year":"2023","unstructured":"Salomon, E. et al. Technical note: Realization and uncertainty analysis for an adjustable 3d structured breast phantom in digital breast tomosynthesis. Med. Phys. 50, 4816\u20134824. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/mp.16600 (2023).","journal-title":"Med. Phys."},{"key":"59516_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"758","DOI":"10.1088\/1361-6560\/aa5407","volume":"62","author":"L Cockmartin","year":"2017","unstructured":"Cockmartin, L. et al. Design and application of a structured phantom for detection performance comparison between breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography. Phys. Med. Biol. 62, 758\u2013780 (2017).","journal-title":"Phys. Med. Biol."},{"key":"59516_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6270","DOI":"10.1002\/mp.15171","volume":"48","author":"L Vancoillie","year":"2021","unstructured":"Vancoillie, L., Cockmartin, L., Marshall, N. & Bosmans, H. The impact on lesion detection via a multi-vendor study: a phantom-based comparison of digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and synthetic mammography. Med. Phys. 48, 6270\u20136292 (2021).","journal-title":"Med. Phys."},{"key":"59516_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2021201948","volume":"299","author":"MS Jochelson","year":"2021","unstructured":"Jochelson, M. S. & Lobbes, M. B. I. Contrast-enhanced mammography: state of the art. Radiology 299, 36\u201348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.2021201948 (2021).","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"59516_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2008.07.035","volume":"69","author":"C Dromain","year":"2009","unstructured":"Dromain, C., Balleyguier, C., Adler, G., Garbay, J. R. & Delaloge, S. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Eur. J. Radiol. 69, 34\u201342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejrad.2008.07.035 (2009).","journal-title":"Eur. J. Radiol."},{"key":"59516_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.212530","volume":"305","author":"N P\u00f6tsch","year":"2022","unstructured":"P\u00f6tsch, N., Vatteroni, G., Clauser, P., Helbich, T. H. & Baltzer, P. A. T. Contrast-enhanced mammography versus contrast-enhanced breast mri: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 305, 94\u2013103. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.212530 (2022).","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"59516_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lawson, M.\u00a0B. et al. Comparative performance of contrast-enhanced mammography, abbreviated breast mri, and standard breast mri for breast cancer screening. Radiology 308, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.230576 (2023).","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.230576"},{"key":"59516_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zanardo, M. et al. Technique, protocols and adverse reactions for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (cesm): a systematic review. Insights into Imaging 10, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13244-019-0756-0 (2019).","DOI":"10.1186\/s13244-019-0756-0"},{"key":"59516_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2017.07.004","volume":"94","author":"IPL Houben","year":"2017","unstructured":"Houben, I. P. L. et al. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography as work-up tool in patients recalled from breast cancer screening has low risks and might hold clinical benefits. European Journal of Radiology 94, 31\u201337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejrad.2017.07.004 (2017).","journal-title":"European Journal of Radiology"},{"key":"59516_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1053\/j.sult.2017.08.005","volume":"39","author":"BK Patel","year":"2018","unstructured":"Patel, B. K., Lobbes, M. B. I. & Lewin, J. Contrast enhanced spectral mammography: A review. Semin. Ultrasound CT MRI 39, 70\u201379. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.sult.2017.08.005 (2018).","journal-title":"Semin. Ultrasound CT MRI"},{"key":"59516_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"627","DOI":"10.1118\/1.3276733","volume":"37","author":"BA Palma","year":"2010","unstructured":"Palma, B. A., Rosado-M\u00e9ndez, I., Villase\u00f1or, Y. & Brandan, M. E. Phantom study to evaluate contrast-medium-enhanced digital subtraction mammography with a full-field indirect-detection system. Med. Phys. 37, 627\u2013639. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1118\/1.3276733 (2010).","journal-title":"Med. Phys."},{"key":"59516_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1115","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nima.2007.06.109","volume":"580","author":"P Baldelli","year":"2007","unstructured":"Baldelli, P. et al. Evaluation of the minimum iodine concentration for contrast-enhanced subtraction mammography. Nucl.\u00a0Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. 580, 1115\u20131118. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.nima.2007.06.109 (2007).","journal-title":"Nucl.\u00a0Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect."},{"key":"59516_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4483","DOI":"10.1002\/mp.12296","volume":"44","author":"H Ding","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ding, H. & Molloi, S. Quantitative contrast-enhanced spectral mammography based on photon-counting detectors: A feasibility study. Med. Phys. 44, 4483\u20134493. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/mp.12296 (2017).","journal-title":"Med. Phys."},{"key":"59516_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"N25","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/58\/3\/N25","volume":"58","author":"R Leithner","year":"2013","unstructured":"Leithner, R., Knogler, T. & Homolka, P. Development and production of a prototype iodine contrast phantom for cedem. Phys. Medicine Biol. 58, N25\u2013N35. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1088\/0031-9155\/58\/3\/N25 (2013).","journal-title":"Phys. Medicine Biol."},{"key":"59516_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Rosado-M\u00e9ndez, I., Villase\u00f1or, Y., Ben\u00edtez-Bribiesca, L. & Brandan, M. E. Contrast-medium-enhanced digital mammography: contrast vs. iodine concentration phantom calibration. In AIP Conference Proceedings 1032, 101\u2013104. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1063\/1.2979241 (2008).","DOI":"10.1063\/1.2979241"},{"key":"59516_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e83","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejmp.2014.07.241","volume":"30","author":"Y-S Hwang","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hwang, Y.-S., Lin, Y.-Y., Cheung, Y.-C., Hsu, H.-L. & Tsai, H.-Y. Quantification study of iodine concentration and image quality indexes in dual energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Phys. Medica 30, e83\u2013e84 (2014).","journal-title":"Phys. Medica"},{"key":"59516_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2018.07.021","volume":"106","author":"MBI Lobbes","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lobbes, M. B. I. et al. Quantification of enhancement in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography using a custom-made quantifier tool (i-strip): a proof-of-concept study. Eur. J. Radiol. 106, 114\u2013121. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejrad.2018.07.021 (2018).","journal-title":"Eur. J. Radiol."},{"key":"59516_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Klausz, R., Rouxel, M., Mancardi, X., Carton, A.-K. & Jeunehomme Patoureaux, F. Introduction of a comprehensive phantom for the quality control of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography. ECR 2018, Poster C-2650 (Scientific Exhibit), https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1594\/ecr2018\/C-2650 (2018).","DOI":"10.1594\/ecr2018\/C-2650"},{"key":"59516_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1088\/1361-6560\/ad027d","volume":"68","author":"L Cockmartin","year":"2023","unstructured":"Cockmartin, L., Bosmans, H. & Marshall, N. W. Investigation of test methods for qc in dual-energy based contrast-enhanced digital mammography systems: I. iodine signal testing.. Phys. Medicine Biol. 68, 215017. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1088\/1361-6560\/ad027d (2023).","journal-title":"Phys. Medicine Biol."},{"key":"59516_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20160232","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20160232","volume":"89","author":"M-E Brandan","year":"2016","unstructured":"Brandan, M.-E. et al. Clinical study of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and the evaluation of blood and lymphatic microvessel density. Br. J. Radiol. 89, 20160232. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1259\/bjr.20160232 (2016).","journal-title":"Br. J. Radiol."},{"key":"59516_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"606","DOI":"10.3390\/biomimetics9100606","volume":"9","author":"P Homolka","year":"2024","unstructured":"Homolka, P., Breyer, L. & Semturs, F. 3d printing materials mimicking human tissues after uptake of iodinated contrast agents for anthropomorphic radiology phantoms. Biomimetics 9, 606. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/biomimetics9100606 (2024).","journal-title":"Biomimetics"},{"key":"59516_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1118\/1.4816309","volume":"40","author":"L Cockmartin","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cockmartin, L., Bosmans, H. & Marshall, N. W. Comparative power law analysis of structured breast phantom and patient images in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis. Med. Phys. 40, 081920. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1118\/1.4816309 (2013).","journal-title":"Med. Phys."},{"key":"59516_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"419","DOI":"10.1118\/1.1355308","volume":"28","author":"AE Burgess","year":"2001","unstructured":"Burgess, A. E., Jacobson, F. L. & Judy, P. F. Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. Med. Phys. 28, 419\u2013437. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1118\/1.1355308 (2001).","journal-title":"Med. Phys."},{"key":"59516_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Oduko, J.\u00a0M., Homolka, P., Jones, V. & Whitwam, D. Dose and image quality measurements for contrast-enhanced dual energy mammography systems. In Hoeschen, C., Kontos, D. & Flohr, T.\u00a0G. (eds.) Medical Imaging 2015: Physics of Medical Imaging, 9412, 94125I, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1117\/12.2082517 (SPIE, 2015).","DOI":"10.1117\/12.2082517"},{"key":"59516_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1575","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-015-4007-6","volume":"26","author":"T Knogler","year":"2016","unstructured":"Knogler, T. et al. Contrast-enhanced dual energy mammography with a novel anode\/filter combination and artifact reduction: a feasibility study. Eur. Radiol. 26, 1575\u20131581. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-015-4007-6 (2016).","journal-title":"Eur. Radiol."},{"key":"59516_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zhang, G., Cockmartin, L. & Bosmans, H. A four-alternative forced choice (4afc) software for observer performance evaluation in radiology. In Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging 2016: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 9787, 97871E, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1117\/12.2216386 (2016).","DOI":"10.1117\/12.2216386"}],"container-title":["Scientific Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-026-59516-5","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-026-59516-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-026-59516-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,6]],"date-time":"2026-10-06T23:01:48Z","timestamp":1791327708000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-026-59516-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,7]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["59516"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-026-59516-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-2322"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2045-2322","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 November 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"22 June 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 July 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Competing interests","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}],"article-number":"31200"}}