{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,29]],"date-time":"2026-05-29T10:10:08Z","timestamp":1780049408210,"version":"3.53.1"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,16]],"date-time":"2016-05-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1463356800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,16]],"date-time":"2016-05-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1463356800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Rep"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>The accuracy of conization for the prediction of radical hysterectomy (RH) pathological variables in patients with stage Ia2 to Ib1 (\u22642\u2009cm) cervical cancer was retrospectively evaluated in the present study. Endocervical or deep resection margin (RM) involvement in the conization specimens was found to be independently associated with residual disease in the hysterectomy specimens (P\u2009&lt;\u20090.001,\u2009=\u20090.003, respectively). When a tumor width of &gt;20\u2009mm in the final RH pathology analysis was predicted by a tumor width of &gt;2\u2009mm or involvement of endocervical or deep RMs in the conization specimens, the sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of conization were 98.2% and 95.2%, respectively. In addition, when deep stromal invasion in the final RH pathology analysis was predicted by deep stromal invasion or involvement of the endocervical or deep RMs in the conization specimens, the sensitivity and NPV of conization were 98.4% and 95.8%, respectively. The sensitivity and NPV of this prediction model for identifying LVSI in the final RH pathology analysis were both 100%. These findings suggest that conization variables and endocervical and deep resection margin statuses can be analyzed to effectively predict RH pathological parameters.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/srep25992","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,16]],"date-time":"2016-05-16T09:42:27Z","timestamp":1463391747000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Accuracy of conization procedure for predicting pathological parameters of radical hysterectomy in stage Ia2\u2013Ib1 (\u22642\u2009cm) cervical cancer"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"6","author":[{"given":"Huimin","family":"Bai","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dongyan","family":"Cao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fang","family":"Yuan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Huilan","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Meizhu","family":"Xiao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jie","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Quancai","family":"Cui","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Keng","family":"Shen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zhenyu","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1007\/s11912-012-0269-1","volume":"14","author":"S Greggi","year":"2012","unstructured":"Greggi, S. & Scaffa, C. Surgical management of early cervical cancer: the shape of future studies. Curr Oncol Rep 14, 527\u2013534, doi: 10.1007\/s11912-012-0269-1 (2012).","journal-title":"Curr Oncol Rep"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"320","DOI":"10.6004\/jnccn.2013.0043","volume":"11","author":"WJ Koh","year":"2013","unstructured":"Koh, W. J. et al. Cervical cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 11, 320\u2013343 (2013).","journal-title":"J Natl Compr Canc Netw"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2009.02.009","volume":"105","author":"S Pecorelli","year":"2009","unstructured":"Pecorelli, S., Zigliani, L. & Odicino, F. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105, 107\u2013108, doi: 10.1016\/j.ijgo.2009.02.009 (2009).","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2007.01.016","volume":"105","author":"M Stegeman","year":"2007","unstructured":"Stegeman, M. et al. The incidence of parametrial tumor involvement in select patients with early cervix cancer is too low to justify parametrectomy. Gynecol Oncol 105, 475\u2013480, doi: 10.1016\/j.ygyno.2007.01.016 (2007).","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1281","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.22899","volume":"110","author":"JD Wright","year":"2007","unstructured":"Wright, J. D. et al. Utility of parametrectomy for early stage cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy. Cancer 110, 1281\u20131286, doi: 10.1002\/cncr.22899 (2007).","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2008.02.004","volume":"109","author":"P Strnad","year":"2008","unstructured":"Strnad, P. et al. A prospective study of sentinel lymph node status and parametrial involvement in patients with small tumour volume cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 109, 280\u2013284, doi: 10.1016\/j.ygyno.2008.02.004 (2008).","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2010.07.015","volume":"119","author":"AL Smith","year":"2010","unstructured":"Smith, A. L. et al. Conservative surgery in early-stage cervical cancer: what percentage of patients may be eligible for conization and lymphadenectomy? Gynecol Oncol 119, 183\u2013186, doi: 10.1016\/j.ygyno.2010.07.015 (2010).","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"426","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2010.08.005","volume":"119","author":"DC Jung","year":"2010","unstructured":"Jung, D. C. et al. Identification of a patient group at low risk for parametrial invasion in early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 119, 426\u2013430, doi: 10.1016\/j.ygyno.2010.08.005 (2010).","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1097\/IGC.0b013e3182072eea","volume":"21","author":"T Kamimori","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kamimori, T. et al. Parametrial involvement in FIGO stage IB1 cervical carcinoma diagnostic impact of tumor diameter in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21, 349\u2013354 (2011).","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2012.04.016","volume":"126","author":"SJ Chang","year":"2012","unstructured":"Chang, S. J., Bristow, R. E. & Ryu, H. S. A model for prediction of parametrial involvement and feasibility of less radical resection of parametrium in patients with FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 126, 82\u201386, doi: 10.1016\/j.ygyno.2012.04.016 (2012).","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2012.10.013","volume":"39","author":"O Gemer","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gemer, O. et al. Can parametrectomy be avoided in early cervical cancer? An algorithm for the identification of patients at low risk for parametrial involvement. Eur J Surg Oncol 39, 76\u201380, doi: 10.1016\/j.ejso.2012.10.013 (2013).","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.01.026","volume":"122","author":"Y Xiong","year":"2013","unstructured":"Xiong, Y., Liu, J. H., Zheng, M., Cao, L. P. & Liang, L. Z. Use of preoperative clinicopathologic characteristics to identify patients with low-risk cervical cancer suitable for Piver class II radical hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 122, 52\u201356, doi: 10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.01.026 (2013).","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2015.01.548","volume":"137","author":"T Kato","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kato, T. et al.Clinical tumor diameter and prognosis of patients with FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer (JCOG0806-A). Gynecol Oncol 137, 34\u201339, doi: 10.1016\/j.ygyno.2015.01.548 (2015).","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.03.042","volume":"130","author":"H Bai","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bai, H. et al. The potential for less radical surgery in women with stage IA2\u2013IB1 cervical cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 130, 235\u2013240, doi: 10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.03.042 (2015).","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2010.06.027","volume":"119","author":"MK Kim","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kim, M. K. et al. Feasibility of less radical surgery for superficially invasive carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 119, 187\u2013191, doi: 10.1016\/j.ygyno.2010.06.027 (2010).","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2011.05.038","volume":"122","author":"J Kodama","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kodama, J. et al. Factors associated with parametrial involvement in stage IB1 cervical cancer and identification of patients suitable for less radical surgery. Gynecol Oncol 122, 491\u2013494, doi: 10.1016\/j.ygyno.2011.05.038 (2011).","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.7150\/jca.10968","volume":"6","author":"J Zhou","year":"2015","unstructured":"Zhou, J. et al. Tailoring pelvic lymphadenectomy for patients with stage IA2, IB1 and IIA1 uterine cervical cancer. J Cancer 6, 377\u2013381, doi: 10.7150\/jca.10968 (2015).","journal-title":"J Cancer"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1159\/000353899","volume":"76","author":"M Meirovitz","year":"2013","unstructured":"Meirovitz, M., Sade, S., Dreiher, J. & Shaco-Levy, R. Is radical hysterectomy necessary in early cervical cancer? Gynecol Obstet Invest 76, 158\u2013162, doi: 10.1159\/000353899 (2013).","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2009.02.012","volume":"105","author":"S Pecorelli","year":"2009","unstructured":"Pecorelli, S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105, 103\u2013104 (2009).","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e151","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.02.017","volume":"199","author":"MA Bidus","year":"2008","unstructured":"Bidus, M. A. et al. Cervical biopsy and excision procedure specimens lack sufficient predictive value for lymph-vascular space invasion seen at hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199, 151, e151\u2013154, doi: 10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.02.017 (2008).","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1214","DOI":"10.1097\/IGC.0b013e31825fb63b","volume":"22","author":"MK Kim","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kim, M. K. et al. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure findings for identification of patients with early-stage cervical cancer suitable for less radical surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer 22, 1214\u20131219, doi: 10.1097\/IGC.0b013e31825fb63b (2012).","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2008.09.011","volume":"112","author":"A Suri","year":"2009","unstructured":"Suri, A., Frumovitz, M., Milam, M. R., dos Reis, R. & Ramirez, P. T. Preoperative pathologic findings associated with residual disease at radical hysterectomy in women with stage IA2 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 112, 110\u2013113, doi: 10.1016\/j.ygyno.2008.09.011 (2009).","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90078-W","volume":"169","author":"HB Krebs","year":"1993","unstructured":"Krebs, H. B., Pastore, L. & Helmkamp, B. F. Loop electrosurgical excision procedures for cervical dysplasia: experience in a community hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 169, 289\u2013293, discussion 293-285 (1993).","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1006\/gyno.1994.1189","volume":"54","author":"P Mathevet","year":"1994","unstructured":"Mathevet, P., Dargent, D., Roy, M. & Beau, G. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser and LEEP. Gynecol Oncol 54, 175\u2013179, doi: 10.1006\/gyno.1994.1189 (1994).","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2011.09.006","volume":"124","author":"N van Hanegem","year":"2012","unstructured":"van Hanegem, N., Barroilhet, L. M., Nucci, M. R., Bernstein, M. & Feldman, S. Fertility-sparing treatment in younger women with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 124, 72\u201377, doi: 10.1016\/j.ygyno.2011.09.006 (2012).","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1097\/lgt.0000000000000055","volume":"19","author":"NA Latif","year":"2015","unstructured":"Latif, N. A., Neubauer, N. L., Helenowski, I. B. & Lurain, J. R. Management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: a comparison of loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization. J Low Genit Tract Dis 19, 97\u2013102, doi: 10.1097\/lgt.0000000000000055 (2015).","journal-title":"J Low Genit Tract Dis"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"a1284","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.a1284","volume":"337","author":"M Arbyn","year":"2008","unstructured":"Arbyn, M. et al. Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis. BMJ 337, a1284, doi: 10.1136\/bmj.a1284 (2008).","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.03.013","volume":"122","author":"A Frega","year":"2013","unstructured":"Frega, A. et al. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 122, 145\u2013149, doi: 10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.03.013 (2013).","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e31","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.02.004","volume":"201","author":"B Noehr","year":"2009","unstructured":"Noehr, B., Jensen, A., Frederiksen, K., Tabor, A. & Kjaer, S. K. Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and subsequent risk for spontaneous preterm delivery: a population-based study of singleton deliveries during a 9-year period. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201, 33, e31\u201336, doi: 10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.02.004 (2009).","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1232","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181bf1ef2","volume":"114","author":"B Noehr","year":"2009","unstructured":"Noehr, B., Jensen, A., Frederiksen, K., Tabor, A. & Kjaer, S. K. Depth of cervical cone removed by loop electrosurgical excision procedure and subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 114, 1232\u20131238, doi: 10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181bf1ef2 (2009).","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2007.05.014","volume":"107","author":"JY Park","year":"2007","unstructured":"Park, J. Y. et al. Risk factors predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III and microinvasive cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 107, 39\u201344, doi: 10.1016\/j.ygyno.2007.05.014 (2007).","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1097\/lgt.0000000000000079","volume":"19","author":"T Tasci","year":"2015","unstructured":"Tasci, T. et al. Is there any predictor for residual disease after cervical conization with positive surgical margins for HSIL or microinvasive cervical cancer? J Low Genit Tract Dis 19, 115\u2013118, doi: 10.1097\/lgt.0000000000000079 (2015).","journal-title":"J Low Genit Tract Dis"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2013.11.019","volume":"132","author":"ES Diaz","year":"2014","unstructured":"Diaz, E. S. et al. Predictors of residual carcinoma or carcinoma-in-situ at hysterectomy following cervical conization with positive margins. Gynecol Oncol 132, 76\u201380, doi: 10.1016\/j.ygyno.2013.11.019 (2014).","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2015.02.024","volume":"137","author":"A Munro","year":"2015","unstructured":"Munro, A. et al. Comparison of cold knife cone biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in the management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: What is the gold standard? Gynecol Oncol 137, 258\u2013263, doi: 10.1016\/j.ygyno.2015.02.024 (2015).","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1097\/igc.0000000000000371","volume":"25","author":"A Ditto","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ditto, A. et al. Fertility-sparing surgery in early-stage cervical cancer patients: oncologic and reproductive outcomes. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25, 493\u2013497, doi: 10.1097\/igc.0000000000000371 (2015).","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2011.08.009","volume":"123","author":"A Maneo","year":"2011","unstructured":"Maneo, A. et al. Simple conization and lymphadenectomy for the conservative treatment of stage IB1 cervical cancer. An Italian experience. Gynecol Oncol 123, 557\u2013560, doi: 10.1016\/j.ygyno.2011.08.009 (2011).","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"key":"BFsrep25992_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1109","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2010.11.010","volume":"95","author":"A Fagotti","year":"2011","unstructured":"Fagotti, A. et al. Excisional cone as fertility-sparing treatment in early-stage cervical cancer. Fertil Steril 95, 1109\u20131112, doi: 10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2010.11.010 (2011).","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"}],"container-title":["Scientific Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/srep25992","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/srep25992.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/srep25992.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,4]],"date-time":"2023-01-04T15:13:25Z","timestamp":1672845205000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/srep25992"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,16]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,19]]}},"alternative-id":["BFsrep25992"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/srep25992","relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-2322"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2045-2322","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,16]]},"assertion":[{"value":"22 July 2015","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 April 2016","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 May 2016","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing financial interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"25992"}}