{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,25]],"date-time":"2026-02-25T07:04:27Z","timestamp":1772003067831,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,2]],"date-time":"2021-07-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1625184000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,2]],"date-time":"2021-07-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1625184000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100007601","name":"Horizon 2020","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["722467"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["722467"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100007601","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001871","name":"Funda\u00e7\u00e3o para a Ci\u00eancia e a Tecnologia","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["UIDB\/00511\/2020"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["UIDB\/00511\/2020"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001871","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Rep"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Microtiter plate methods are commonly used for biofilm assessment. However, results obtained with these methods have often been difficult to reproduce. Hence, it is important to obtain a better understanding of the repeatability and reproducibility of these methods. An interlaboratory study was performed in five different laboratories to evaluate the reproducibility and responsiveness of three methods to quantify <jats:italic>Staphylococcus aureus<\/jats:italic> biofilm formation in 96-well microtiter plates: crystal violet, resazurin, and plate counts. An inter-lab protocol was developed for the study. The protocol was separated into three steps: biofilm growth, biofilm challenge, biofilm assessment. For control experiments participants performed the growth and assessment steps only. For treatment experiments, all three steps were performed and the efficacy of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) in killing <jats:italic>S. aureus<\/jats:italic> biofilms was evaluated. In control experiments, on the log<jats:sub>10<\/jats:sub>-scale, the reproducibility SD (S<jats:sub>R<\/jats:sub>)\u00a0was 0.44 for crystal violet, 0.53 for resazurin, and 0.92 for the plate counts. In the treatment experiments, plate counts had the best responsiveness to different levels of efficacy and also the best reproducibility with respect to responsiveness (Slope\/S<jats:sub>R<\/jats:sub>\u2009=\u20091.02), making it the more reliable method to use in an antimicrobial efficacy test. This study showed that the microtiter plate is a versatile and easy-to-use biofilm reactor, which exhibits good repeatability and reproducibility for different types of assessment methods, as long as a suitable experimental design and statistical analysis is applied.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-93115-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,2]],"date-time":"2021-07-02T10:21:22Z","timestamp":1625221282000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":48,"title":["Interlaboratory study for the evaluation of three microtiter plate-based biofilm quantification methods"],"prefix":"10.1038","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Jontana","family":"Allkja","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Frits","family":"van Charante","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Juliana","family":"Aizawa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"In\u00e9s","family":"Reigada","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Clara","family":"Guarch-P\u00e9rez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Jesus Augusto","family":"Vazquez-Rodriguez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Paul","family":"Cos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Tom","family":"Coenye","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Adyary","family":"Fallarero","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Sebastian A. J.","family":"Zaat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Antonio","family":"Felici","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Livia","family":"Ferrari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Nuno F.","family":"Azevedo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Albert E.","family":"Parker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Darla M.","family":"Goeres","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"93115_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34112","DOI":"10.1126\/scitranslmed.aaf5027","volume":"8","author":"SN Goodman","year":"2016","unstructured":"Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D. & Ioannidis, J. P. What does research reproducibility mean?. Sci. Transl. Med. 8, 34112 (2016).","journal-title":"Sci. Transl. Med."},{"key":"93115_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"171511","DOI":"10.1098\/rsos.171511","volume":"5","author":"DR Grimes","year":"2018","unstructured":"Grimes, D. R., Bauch, C. T. & Ioannidis, J. P. Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure. R. Soc. Open Sci. 5, 171511 (2018).","journal-title":"R. Soc. Open Sci."},{"key":"93115_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCRESAHA.114.303819","volume":"116","author":"CG Begley","year":"2015","unstructured":"Begley, C. G. & Ioannidis, J. P. Reproducibility in science: improving the standard for basic and preclinical research. Circ. Res. 116, 116\u2013126 (2015).","journal-title":"Circ. Res."},{"key":"93115_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1038\/533026a","volume":"533","author":"M Baker","year":"2016","unstructured":"Baker, M. Reproducibility Crisis?. Nature 533, 26 (2016).","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"93115_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mimet.2007.11.010","volume":"72","author":"E Peeters","year":"2008","unstructured":"Peeters, E., Nelis, H. J. & Coenye, T. Comparison of multiple methods for quantification of microbial biofilms grown in microtiter plates. J. Microbiol. Methods 72, 157\u2013165 (2008).","journal-title":"J. Microbiol. Methods"},{"key":"93115_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijantimicag.2008.04.022","volume":"32","author":"M Sandberg","year":"2008","unstructured":"Sandberg, M., M\u00e4\u00e4tt\u00e4nen, A., Peltonen, J., Vuorela, P. M. & Fallarero, A. Automating a 96-well microtitre plate model for Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: An approach to screening of natural antimicrobial compounds. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 32, 233\u2013240 (2008).","journal-title":"Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents"},{"key":"93115_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1721","DOI":"10.5740\/jaoacint.15-066","volume":"98","author":"P Jorge","year":"2015","unstructured":"Jorge, P., Louren\u00e7o, A. & Pereira, M. O. Data quality in biofilm high-throughput routine analysis: intralaboratory protocol adaptation and experiment reproducibility. J. AOAC Int. 98, 1721\u20131727 (2015).","journal-title":"J. AOAC Int."},{"key":"93115_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100006","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bioflm.2019.100006","volume":"1","author":"KN Kragh","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kragh, K. N., Alhede, M., Kvich, L. & Bjarnsholt, T. Into the well: A close look at the complex structures of a microtiter biofilm and the crystal violet assay. Biofilm 1, 100006 (2019).","journal-title":"Biofilm"},{"key":"93115_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1080\/1040841X.2016.1208146","volume":"43","author":"J Azeredo","year":"2017","unstructured":"Azeredo, J. et al. Critical review on biofilm methods. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 43, 313\u2013351 (2017).","journal-title":"Crit. Rev. Microbiol."},{"key":"93115_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1211","DOI":"10.3390\/molecules21091211","volume":"21","author":"M Skogman","year":"2016","unstructured":"Skogman, M., Kanerva, S., Manner, S., Vuorela, P. & Fallarero, A. Flavones as quorum sensing inhibitors identified by a newly optimized screening platform using chromobacterium violaceum as reporter bacteria. Molecules 21, 1211 (2016).","journal-title":"Molecules"},{"key":"93115_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1024","DOI":"10.3389\/fmicb.2016.01024","volume":"7","author":"LDR Melo","year":"2016","unstructured":"Melo, L. D. R. et al. Development of a phage cocktail to control proteus mirabilis catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1024 (2016).","journal-title":"Front. Microbiol."},{"key":"93115_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ces.2013.02.045","volume":"94","author":"JMR Moreira","year":"2013","unstructured":"Moreira, J. M. R. et al. The effect of glucose concentration and shaking conditions on Escherichia coli biofilm formation in microtiter plates. Chem. Eng. Sci. 94, 192\u2013199 (2013).","journal-title":"Chem. Eng. Sci."},{"key":"93115_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"231083","DOI":"10.1155\/2014\/231083","volume":"2014","author":"LC Gomes","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gomes, L. C., Moreira, J. M. R., Sim\u00f5es, M., Melo, L. F. & Mergulh\u00e3o, F. J. Biofilm localization in the vertical wall of shaking 96-well plates. Scientifica 2014, 231083 (2014).","journal-title":"Scientifica"},{"key":"93115_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"570","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cmi.2018.01.003","volume":"24","author":"T Coenye","year":"2018","unstructured":"Coenye, T., Goeres, D., Van Bambeke, F. & Bjarnsholt, T. Should standardized susceptibility testing for microbial biofilms be introduced in clinical practice?. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 24, 570\u2013572 (2018).","journal-title":"Clin. Microbiol. Infect."},{"key":"93115_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"250","DOI":"10.1111\/2049-632X.12146","volume":"70","author":"A Louren\u00e7o","year":"2014","unstructured":"Louren\u00e7o, A. et al. Minimum information about a biofilm experiment (MIABiE): standards for reporting experiments and data on sessile microbial communities living at interfaces. Pathog. Dis. 70, 250\u2013256 (2014).","journal-title":"Pathog. Dis."},{"key":"93115_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100010","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bioflm.2019.100010","volume":"2","author":"J Allkja","year":"2020","unstructured":"Allkja, J. et al. Minimum information guideline for spectrophotometric and fluorometric methods to assess biofilm formation in microplates. Biofilm 2, 100010 (2020).","journal-title":"Biofilm"},{"key":"93115_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mimet.2014.04.013","volume":"102","author":"AE Parker","year":"2014","unstructured":"Parker, A. E. et al. Ruggedness and reproducibility of the MBEC biofilm disinfectant efficacy test. J. Microbiol. Methods 102, 55\u201364 (2014).","journal-title":"J. Microbiol. Methods"},{"key":"93115_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105694","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mimet.2019.105694","volume":"165","author":"DM Goeres","year":"2019","unstructured":"Goeres, D. M. et al. Development, standardization, and validation of a biofilm efficacy test: The single tube method. J. Microbiol. Methods 165, 105694 (2019).","journal-title":"J. Microbiol. Methods"},{"key":"93115_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105963","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mimet.2020.105963","volume":"174","author":"DM Goeres","year":"2020","unstructured":"Goeres, D. M. et al. Drip flow reactor method exhibits excellent reproducibility based on a 10-laboratory collaborative study. J. Microbiol. Methods 174, 105963 (2020).","journal-title":"J. Microbiol. Methods"},{"key":"93115_CR20","unstructured":"ASTM E2799-17. Standard Test Method for Testing Disinfectant Efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm using the MBEC Assay. ASTM Int. West Conshohocken PA (2017)."},{"key":"93115_CR21","unstructured":"ASTM E2562. Standard Test Method for Evaluating Disinfectant Efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Grown in CDC Biofilm Reactor Using Single Tube Method. (2019)."},{"key":"93115_CR22","unstructured":"ASTM E2647-20. Standard Test Method for Quantification of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Grown Using a Drip Flow Biofilm Reactor with Low Shear and Continuous Flow. ASTM Int. West Conshohocken PA (2020)."},{"key":"93115_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1138","DOI":"10.5740\/jaoacint.12-217","volume":"96","author":"MA Hamilton","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hamilton, M. A., Hamilton, G. C., Goeres, D. M. & Parker, A. E. Guidelines for the statistical analysis of a collaborative study of a laboratory method for testing disinfectant product performance. J. AOAC Int. 96, 1138\u20131151 (2013).","journal-title":"J. AOAC Int."},{"key":"93115_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1007\/s00284-014-0738-x","volume":"70","author":"BG Fritz","year":"2015","unstructured":"Fritz, B. G., Walker, D. K., Goveia, D. E., Parker, A. E. & Goeres, D. M. Evaluation of PetrifilmTM aerobic count plates as an equivalent alternative to drop plating on R2A agar plates in a biofilm disinfectant efficacy test. Curr. Microbiol. 70, 450\u2013456 (2015).","journal-title":"Curr. Microbiol."},{"key":"93115_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"717","DOI":"10.5740\/jaoacint.12-469","volume":"96","author":"MT Nelson","year":"2013","unstructured":"Nelson, M. T., LaBudde, R. A., Tomasino, S. F. & Pines, R. M. Comparison of 3M Petrifilm Aerobic Count Plates to standard plating methodology for use with AOAC antimicrobial efficacy methods 955.14, 955.15, 964.02, and 966.04 as an alternative enumeration procedure: Collaborative study. J. AOAC Int. 96, 717\u2013722 (2013).","journal-title":"J. AOAC Int."},{"key":"93115_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Parker, A. E., Hamilton, M. A. & Goeres, D. M. Reproducibility of antimicrobial test methods. Sci. Rep. 8, (2018).","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-018-30282-3"},{"key":"93115_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1081\/QEN-120001876","volume":"14","author":"SJ Richter","year":"2002","unstructured":"Richter, S. J. & Richter, C. A method for determining equivalence in industrial applications. Qual. Eng. 14, 375\u2013380 (2002).","journal-title":"Qual. Eng."},{"key":"93115_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1168","DOI":"10.1016\/j.trac.2011.03.012","volume":"30","author":"M Thompson","year":"2011","unstructured":"Thompson, M. Uncertainty functions, a compact way of summarising or specifying the behaviour of analytical systems. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 30, 1168\u20131175 (2011).","journal-title":"TrAC Trends Anal. Chem."},{"key":"93115_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1128\/microbiolspec.MB-0010-2014","volume":"3","author":"PS Stewart","year":"2015","unstructured":"Stewart, P. S. Antimicrobial tolerance in biofilms. Microbiol. Spectr. 3, 1\u201310 (2015).","journal-title":"Microbiol. Spectr."},{"key":"93115_CR30","volume-title":"KSA-SM-10: Assessing Resemblance, Repeatability, and Reproducibility for Quantitative Methods","author":"AE Parker","year":"2011","unstructured":"Parker, A. E. & Hamilton, M. A. KSA-SM-10: Assessing Resemblance, Repeatability, and Reproducibility for Quantitative Methods (Center for Biofilm Engineering at Montana State University, 2011)."},{"key":"93115_CR31","unstructured":"Hamilton, M. A. KSA-SM-03\u2014Testing surface disinfectants: Desirable attributes of a standardized method. (2010)."},{"key":"93115_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e02264","DOI":"10.1128\/AEM.02264-17","volume":"84","author":"KN Kragh","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kragh, K. N. et al. The inoculation method could impact the outcome of microbiological experiments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 84, e02264-e2317 (2018).","journal-title":"Appl. Environ. Microbiol."}],"container-title":["Scientific Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-93115-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-93115-w","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-93115-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,3]],"date-time":"2022-12-03T11:00:40Z","timestamp":1670065240000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-021-93115-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,2]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["93115"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-021-93115-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["2045-2322"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2045-2322","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"21 January 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 June 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 July 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"13779"}}