{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,13]],"date-time":"2026-03-13T02:03:31Z","timestamp":1773367411862,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"American Speech Language Hearing Association","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Am J Audiol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>The purpose of this study was to determine whether an alternate fitting strategy, specifically adjustment to gains in a hearing aid (HA), would improve performance in patients who experienced poorer performance in the bimodal condition when the HA was fit to traditional targets.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Method<\/jats:title><jats:p>This study was a retrospective chart review from a local clinic population seen during a 6-month period. Participants included 6 users of bimodal stimulation. Two performed poorer in the cochlear implant (CI) + HA condition than in the CI-only condition. One individual performed higher in the bimodal condition, but the overall performance was low. Three age range\u2013matched users whose performance increased when the HA was used in conjunction with a CI were also included. The HA gain was reduced beyond 2000 Hz. Speech perception scores were obtained pre- and postmodification to the HA fitting.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>All listeners whose HA was programmed using the modified approach demonstrated improved speech perception scores with the modified HA fit in the bimodal condition when compared with the traditional HA fit in the bimodal condition.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Modifications to gains above 2000 Hz in the HA may improve performance for bimodal listeners who perform more poorly in the bimodal condition when the HA is fit to traditional targets.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1044\/2015_aja-15-0045","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,11,4]],"date-time":"2015-11-04T14:30:38Z","timestamp":1446647438000},"page":"462-468","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Reduction in High-Frequency Hearing Aid Gain Can Improve Performance in Patients With Contralateral Cochlear Implant: A Pilot Study"],"prefix":"10.1044","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Jessica J.","family":"Messersmith","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of South Dakota, Vermillion"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lindsey E.","family":"Jorgensen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of South Dakota, Vermillion"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jessica A.","family":"Hagg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of South Dakota, Vermillion"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1310","reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_1_2_1","unstructured":"Baer T. Moore B. C. & Kluk K. (2002). Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 112 1133\u20131144."},{"key":"e_1_3_1_3_1","unstructured":"Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2005). National coverage determination (NCD) for cochlear implantation (50.3). Retrieved from http:\/\/www.cms.gov\/medicare-coverage-database\/details\/ncd-details.aspx?NCDId=245&ncdver=2&bc=BAABAAAAAAAA&"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AUD.0000111261.84611.C8"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003446-200110000-00002"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1084713807304357"},{"issue":"7","key":"e_1_3_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0042-1748124","article-title":"Expectations about hearing aids and their relationship to fitting outcome","volume":"11","author":"Cox R. M.","year":"2000","journal-title":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AUD.0b013e318202e982"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3766\/jaaa.26.4.7"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3766\/jaaa.25.2.2"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000111782"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/lary.21148"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003446-200508001-00010"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_14_1","volume-title":"Cochlear implant performance in the older adult veteran population","author":"Jorgensen L.","year":"2014"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-009-0993-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/14992020500376990"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3766\/jaaa.21.6.3"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_18_1","unstructured":"Minimum Speech Test Battery (MSTB): For adult cochlear implant users [User manual]. (2011). Retrieved from http:\/\/www.auditorypotential.com\/MSTBfiles\/MSTBManual2011-06-20%20.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000219487"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1044\/1092-4388(2006\/027)"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00016480510027493"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AUD.0b013e31828e86e8"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00016480510044412"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1044\/jshd.5401.03"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3766\/jaaa.24.2.4"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1044\/1059-0889(2007\/011)"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3766\/jaaa.16.8.9"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3766\/jaaa.20.5.6"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1121\/1.1776192"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AUD.0b013e31822c2549"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_31_1","unstructured":"Tyler R. S. Dunn C. C. Witt S. A. Noble W. Gantz B. J. Rubinstein J. T. \u2026 Branin S. C. (2006). Soundfield hearing for patients with cochlear implants and hearing aids. In Cooper H. & Craddock L. (Eds.) Cochlear implants: A practical guide (2nd ed. pp. 338\u2013366). London: Whurr."},{"key":"e_1_3_1_32_1","first-page":"151","article-title":"Future directions for cochlear implants","volume":"16","author":"Tyler R. S.","year":"1992","journal-title":"Journal of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003446-200204000-00003"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3766\/jaaa.19.5.7"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1121\/1.1381534"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AUD.0b013e3181c4758d"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Audiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/pubs.asha.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1044\/2015_AJA-15-0045","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,25]],"date-time":"2022-05-25T04:46:16Z","timestamp":1653453976000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/pubs.asha.org\/doi\/10.1044\/2015_AJA-15-0045"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]},"references-count":35,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1044\/2015_AJA-15-0045"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1044\/2015_aja-15-0045","relation":{},"ISSN":["1059-0889","1558-9137"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1059-0889","type":"print"},{"value":"1558-9137","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,12]]}}}