{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,18]],"date-time":"2023-11-18T08:30:53Z","timestamp":1700296253722},"reference-count":10,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2001,12,24]],"date-time":"2001-12-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1009152000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":692,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Cytopathology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2000,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Outcome of women referred to colposcopy for persistently inadequate smears<\/jats:title><jats:p>The outcome of referral to colposcopy of 240 women who had persistently inadequate smears was investigated. Of 232 women who attended colposcopy, 214 (92.2%) had a normal outcome, 12 (5.2%) had low grade abnormalities, and six (2.6%) had high grade abnormalities. This group of women therefore has a negligibly increased risk of harbouring cervical neoplasia. Although not directly comparable, women with a history of previous abnormal cytology did not have a higher risk than those without such a history. Unnecessary colposcopy could have been avoided in the majority of cases if a good quality repeat smear had been taken. Improved smear taker training could decrease the number of referrals. A hospital cytology clinic is proposed as a cost\u2010effective alternative to colposcopy at the first attendance.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2303.2000.00210.x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2003,3,11]],"date-time":"2003-03-11T14:00:27Z","timestamp":1047391227000},"page":"38-44","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Outcome of women referred to colposcopy for persistently inadequate smears"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"C.","family":"Sen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M. T.","family":"Brett","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2001,12,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_2","unstructured":"Achievable Standards Benchmarks for Reporting and Criteria for Evaluating Cervical Cytopathology. NHSCSP Publication no. 1 October 1995: 10."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_2","unstructured":"Quality Assurance Guidelines for the Cervical Screening Programme. NHSCSP Publication No 3 January 1996: 9."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_2","unstructured":"Achievable Standards Benchmarks for Reporting and Criteria for Evaluating Cervical Cytopathology. NHSCSP Publication no. 1 October 1995: 9."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_2","unstructured":"National Cervical Screening Programme. HSG(93)41 Department of Health 1993."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_2","unstructured":"'Your smear test' \u2018What your abnormal result means\u2019 and \u2018The colposcopy examination\u2019. Health Education Authority 1996."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_2","unstructured":"Resource Pack for Training Smear Takers. NHSCSP Publication no. 9 July 1998."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2303.1998.00108.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2303.1998.00124.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2303.1998.00001.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2303.1998.00002.x"}],"container-title":["Cytopathology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2303.2000.00210.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2303.2000.00210.x","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1046\/j.1365-2303.2000.00210.x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,29]],"date-time":"2023-10-29T10:49:30Z","timestamp":1698576570000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1046\/j.1365-2303.2000.00210.x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2000,2]]},"references-count":10,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2000,2]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1046\/j.1365-2303.2000.00210.x"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.1365-2303.2000.00210.x","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0956-5507","1365-2303"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0956-5507","type":"print"},{"value":"1365-2303","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2000,2]]}}}