{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]],"date-time":"2026-09-30T04:35:40Z","timestamp":1790742940872,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2009,10,1]],"date-time":"2009-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1254355200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Seminars in Perinatology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,10]]},"DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,9,30]],"date-time":"2009-09-30T05:33:01Z","timestamp":1254288781000},"page":"312-316","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Prediction of Preterm Birth: Nonsonographic Cervical Methods"],"prefix":"10.1053","volume":"33","author":[{"given":"Michael G.","family":"Ross","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marie H.","family":"Beall","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1340","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.286.11.1340","article-title":"Mid-trimester endovaginal sonography in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth","volume":"286","author":"Owen","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Am Med Assoc"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000275287.08520.4a","article-title":"Prediction and prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth","volume":"110","author":"Spong","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.02008.x","article-title":"Novel developments on cervical length screening and progesterone for preventing preterm birth","volume":"116","author":"Berghella","year":"2009","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199602293340904","article-title":"The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery","volume":"334","author":"Iams","year":"1996","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib5","first-page":"43","article-title":"Cervical effacement: variation in belief among clinicians","volume":"78","author":"Holcomb","year":"1991","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"853","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70282-5","article-title":"Interobserver reliability of digital and endovaginal ultrasonographic cervical length measurements","volume":"177","author":"Goldberg","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"745","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00027-O","article-title":"The correlation between transperineal sonography and digital examination in the evaluation of the third-trimester cervix","volume":"85","author":"Richey","year":"1995","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib8","first-page":"172","article-title":"Measurement of cervical length in pregnancy: comparison between vaginal ultrasonography and digital examination","volume":"76","author":"Sonek","year":"1990","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"717","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1990.9.12.717","article-title":"Translabial ultrasound of the third-trimester uterine cervix","volume":"9","author":"Mahony","year":"1990","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.3109\/01443619209013646","article-title":"The accuracy of digital examination and ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical length","volume":"79","author":"Jackson","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(01)01386-2","article-title":"Transvaginal ultrasound and digital examination in predicting successful labor induction","volume":"98","author":"Chandra","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1361","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00725-7","article-title":"Prediction of successful induction of labor at term: role of clinical history, digital examination, ultrasound assessment of the cervix, and fetal fibronectin assay","volume":"189","author":"Reis","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00549.x","article-title":"Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low bishop score","volume":"112","author":"Rozenberg","year":"2005","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1159\/000089045","article-title":"Sonographic cervical length measurement before labor induction in term nulliparous women","volume":"21","author":"Daskalakis","year":"2006","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"799","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701409858","article-title":"Comparison of ultrasonographic cervical length and the bishop score in predicting successful labor induction","volume":"86","author":"Gomez Laencina","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610600797459","article-title":"Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cervix before induction of labour","volume":"26","author":"Elghorori","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-008-0915-x","article-title":"Comparison of the bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor inductionn","volume":"280","author":"Uyar","year":"2009","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"568","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4018","article-title":"Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of cesarean delivery","volume":"29","author":"Tan","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2007.07.014","article-title":"Digital and transvaginal ultrasound cervical assessment for prediction of successful labor induction","volume":"100","author":"Tanir","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1342","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340600935722","article-title":"Is sonographic assessment of cervical length better than digital examination in screening for preterm delivery in a low-risk population?","volume":"85","author":"Matijevic","year":"2006","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1159\/000052883","article-title":"Vaginal ultrasound as an adjunct to cervical digital examination in women at risk of early delivery","volume":"51","author":"Zlatnik","year":"2001","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1137","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.123822","article-title":"Prematurity in multiple gestations: identification of patients who are at low risk","volume":"186","author":"McMahon","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"707","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2616","article-title":"Cervical assessment at 22 and 27 weeks for the prediction of spontaneous birth before 34 weeks in twin pregnancies: is transvaginal sonography more accurate than digital examination?","volume":"26","author":"Vayssiere","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.3908","article-title":"Targeted therapy for threatened preterm labor based on sonographic measurement of the cervical length: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"29","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(97)00211-7","article-title":"Digital examination and transperineal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length to assess risk of preterm delivery","volume":"59","author":"Onderoglu","year":"1997","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"956","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(94)90014-0","article-title":"Ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix is better than cervical digital examination as a predictor of the likelihood of premature delivery in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes","volume":"171","author":"Gomez","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.02.029","article-title":"Ultrasonographic cervical length measurement is not a better predictor of preterm delivery than digital examination in a population of patients with idiopathic preterm labor","volume":"117","author":"Volumenie","year":"2004","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib28","first-page":"385","article-title":"Objective cervical portio length measurements: consistency and efficacy of screening for a short cervix","volume":"52","author":"Ross","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e37","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.11.026","article-title":"Blinded comparison of cervical portio length measurements by digital examination vs Cervilenz","volume":"200","author":"Burwick","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"863","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000258276.64005.ce","article-title":"Natural history of cervical funneling in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth","volume":"109","author":"Berghella","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"200","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2001.00437.x","article-title":"Cervical length and funneling at 23 weeks of gestation in the prediction of spontaneous early preterm delivery","volume":"18","author":"To","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6301","article-title":"Cervical length and risk of antepartum bleeding in women with complete placenta previa","volume":"33","author":"Ghi","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1346","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa0706834","article-title":"Cervical length at mid-pregnancy and the risk of primary cesarean delivery","volume":"358","author":"Smith","year":"2008","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004_bib34","first-page":"963","article-title":"Opinion 419, 2008 (replaces no. 29 November 1, 2003)","volume":"112","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Seminars in Perinatology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0146000509000445?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0146000509000445?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,22]],"date-time":"2019-05-22T18:59:44Z","timestamp":1558551584000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0146000509000445"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2009,10]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,10]]}},"alternative-id":["S0146000509000445"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.06.004","relation":{},"ISSN":["0146-0005"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0146-0005","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2009,10]]}}}