{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,23]],"date-time":"2026-08-23T17:17:15Z","timestamp":1787505435859,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":63,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,1]],"date-time":"2012-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1349049600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Seminars in Perinatology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,10]]},"DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,9,23]],"date-time":"2012-09-23T08:29:31Z","timestamp":1348388971000},"page":"328-335","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["When Is Primary Cesarean Appropriate: Fetal Indications"],"prefix":"10.1053","volume":"36","author":[{"given":"Lynn L.","family":"Simpson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65","article-title":"Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate","volume":"118","author":"Barber","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"816","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000156299.52668.e2","article-title":"Differences between hospitals in cesarean rates for term primigravidas with cephalic presentation","volume":"105","author":"Fischer","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib3","first-page":"56","article-title":"A review of NICHD standardized nomenclature for cardiotocography: The importance of speaking a common language when describing electronic fetal monitoring","volume":"1","author":"Robinson","year":"2008","journal-title":"Rev Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181aef106","article-title":"ACOG Practice Bulletin number 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: Nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles","volume":"114","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib5","unstructured":"Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GML: Continuous Cardiotocography (CTG) as a Form of Electronic Fetal Monitoring (EFM) for Fetal Assessment During Labour (Review), in The Cochrane Collaboration: The Cochrane Library, issue 4. West Sussex, United Kingdom, John Wiley & Sons, 2008"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199603073341001","article-title":"Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy","volume":"334","author":"Nelson","year":"1996","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181841395","article-title":"The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring","volume":"112","author":"Macones","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"278","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.08.016","article-title":"Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: Applying principles of patient safety","volume":"206","author":"Miller","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"170","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2009.10.002","article-title":"The legal effects of fetal monitoring guidelines","volume":"108","author":"Dickens","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000038.pub2","article-title":"Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies","volume":"1","author":"Lalor","year":"2008","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib11","article-title":"Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies","volume":"1","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD004075.pub2","article-title":"Fetal pulse oximetry for fetal assessment in labour","volume":"4","author":"East","year":"2004","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2195","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa061170","article-title":"Fetal pulse oximetry and cesarean delivery","volume":"355","author":"Bloom","year":"2006","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clp.2010.12.009","article-title":"ST segment analysis as an adjunct to electronic fetal monitoring, part I: Background, physiology, and interpretation","volume":"38","author":"Belfort","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.09.021","article-title":"Effectiveness of pulse oximetry versus fetal electrocardiography for the intrapartum evaluation of nonreassuring fetal heart rate","volume":"159","author":"Valverde","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib16","series-title":"The Cochrane Collaboration: The Cochrane Library, issue 10","article-title":"Fetal Electrocardiogram (ECG) for Fetal Monitoring During Labour (Review)","author":"Neilson","year":"2011"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"540","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01105.x","article-title":"Malpresentations\u2014Impact on mode of delivery","volume":"90","author":"Gardberg","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3","article-title":"Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: A randomized multicenter trial","volume":"356","author":"Hannah","year":"2000","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1189","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200112000-00045","article-title":"ACOG committee opinion, number 265","volume":"98","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000166","article-title":"Planned cesarean section for term breech delivery","volume":"3","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"2003","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)34221-9","article-title":"Vaginal delivery of breech presentation","volume":"31","author":"Kotaska","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib22","first-page":"96","article-title":"To rescue a vanishing obstetric skill\u2014Vaginal breech delivery","volume":"150","author":"Glezerman","year":"2011","journal-title":"Harefuah"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200607000-00058","article-title":"ACOG committee opinion no. 340","volume":"108","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1443","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01221.x","article-title":"External cephalic version of non-cephalic presentation: Is it worthwhile?","volume":"90","author":"Gottvaill","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.07.023","article-title":"A prospective study of the factors associated with the success rate of external cephalic version for breech presentation at term","volume":"112","author":"Burgos","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"660","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050802244938","article-title":"Prognostic parameters for successful external cephalic version","volume":"21","author":"Ben-Meir","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000184.pub3","article-title":"Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version","volume":"1","author":"Cluver","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1343","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000295605.38175.7b","article-title":"External cephalic version for breech presentation with or without spinal analgesia in nulliparous women at term: A randomized controlled trial","volume":"110","author":"Weiniger","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"763","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.09.056","article-title":"Cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version of breech presentation at term: A comparative study","volume":"190","author":"V\u00e9zina","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31822545a9","article-title":"Timing of delivery during external cephalic version and the risk for cesarean delivery","volume":"118","author":"Kabiri","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.3109\/14767051003710276","article-title":"Manual rotation to reduce cesarean delivery in persistent occiput posterior or transverse position","volume":"24","author":"Shaffer","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2009.00380.x","article-title":"The fetal occiput posterior position: State of the science and a new perspective","volume":"37","author":"Simkin","year":"2010","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"837","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000206217.07883.a2","article-title":"The association between persistent occiput posterior position and neonatal outcomes","volume":"107","author":"Cheng","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"380","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2011.567343","article-title":"Is the use of symphysis-fundal height measurement and ultrasound examination effective in detecting small or large fetuses?","volume":"31","author":"Hargreaves","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib35","first-page":"U2146","article-title":"Reliability of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in term singleton pregnancies","volume":"119","author":"Colman","year":"2006","journal-title":"N Z Med J"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib36","first-page":"674","article-title":"Estimated fetal weight","volume":"44","author":"Herrero","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01354.x","article-title":"Risk of shoulder dystocia: Associations with parity and offspring birthweight","volume":"91","author":"Overland","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"664","DOI":"10.3109\/00016341003686099","article-title":"Macrosomia: Mode of delivery and pregnancy outcome","volume":"89","author":"Bj\u00f8rstad","year":"2010","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.12.036","article-title":"Obstetric and neonatal risks among extremely macrosomic babies and their mothers","volume":"204","author":"Vidarsdottir","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"470","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2012.01358.x","article-title":"The influence of fetal head circumference on labor outcome: A population-based register study","volume":"91","author":"Elvander","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib41","series-title":"Fetal Macrosomia","year":"2000"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.05.002","article-title":"Outcomes associated with introduction of a shoulder dystocia protocol","volume":"205","author":"Grobman","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050410001668707","article-title":"The impact of route of delivery and presentation on twin neonatal and infant mortality: A population-based study in the USA, 1995-97","volume":"15","author":"Kontopoulos","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1095","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182318651","article-title":"Trends in cesarean delivery for twin births in the United States, 1995-2008","volume":"118","author":"Lee","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1032","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(01)01597-6","article-title":"Combined vaginal-cesarean delivery of twin pregnancies","volume":"98","author":"Persad","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01356.x","article-title":"Twin births: Cesarean section or vaginal delivery?","volume":"91","author":"Hoffmann","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"995","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2002.811101.x","article-title":"Monoamniotic twins: Diagnosis and management","volume":"81","author":"Su","year":"2002","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(02)00033-7","article-title":"Route of delivery of fetuses with structural anomalies","volume":"106","author":"Anteby","year":"2003","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.01.012","article-title":"Influence of birth mode on early neurological outcome in infants with myelomeningocele","volume":"156","author":"Cuppen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1097\/00006254-199004000-00001","article-title":"Optimal route of delivery for meningomyelocele","volume":"45","author":"Sakala","year":"1990","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(98)00170-5","article-title":"Omphalocele delivery enigma: The best mode of delivery still remains dubious","volume":"82","author":"Lurie","year":"1999","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"528","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2004.11.037","article-title":"Perinatal management of gastroschisis: Analysis of a newly established clinical pathway","volume":"40","author":"Vegunta","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Pediatr Surg"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1527","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.106852","article-title":"Is vaginal delivery preferable to elective cesarean delivery in fetuses with a known ventral wall defect?","volume":"182","author":"How","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.03.015","article-title":"Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring in cases of congenital heart disease","volume":"201","author":"Ueda","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpeds.2011.01.004","article-title":"Impact of mode of delivery on markers of perinatal hemodynamics in infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome","volume":"159","author":"Peterson","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Pediatr"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"988","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtcvs.2010.09.043","article-title":"Prediction and perinatal management of severely restrictive atrial septum in fetuses with critical left heart obstruction: Clinical experience using pulmonary venous Doppler analysis","volume":"141","author":"Divanovi\u0107","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1016\/j.echo.2010.12.020","article-title":"Fetal predictors of urgent balloon atrial septostomy in neonates with complete transposition","volume":"24","author":"Punn","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Am Soc Echocardiogr"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib58","first-page":"88","article-title":"Congenital anomalies: Impact of prenatal diagnosis on mode of delivery","volume":"103","author":"Dempsey","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ir Med J"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2011.580801","article-title":"Prenatal diagnosis and cesarean section in a large, population-based birth defects registry","volume":"25","author":"Case","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1016\/S0095-5108(18)30413-5","article-title":"Route of delivery of infants with congenital anomalies","volume":"20","author":"McCurdy","year":"1993","journal-title":"Clin Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"438","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340802001711","article-title":"Attitudes towards cesarean section in a nationwide sample of obstetricians and gynecologists","volume":"87","author":"Gunnervik","year":"2008","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.3109\/00016340903418777","article-title":"Changed indications for cesarean sections","volume":"89","author":"Stjernholm","year":"2010","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"791","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(03)00620-3","article-title":"Changes in maternal characteristics and obstetric practice and recent increases in primary cesarean delivery","volume":"102","author":"Joseph","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Seminars in Perinatology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S014600051200050X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S014600051200050X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,4]],"date-time":"2019-07-04T00:34:17Z","timestamp":1562200457000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S014600051200050X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,10]]},"references-count":63,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,10]]}},"alternative-id":["S014600051200050X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015","relation":{},"ISSN":["0146-0005"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0146-0005","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,10]]}}}