{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]],"date-time":"2026-03-06T10:49:00Z","timestamp":1772794140992,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":106,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,10,1]],"date-time":"2015-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1443657600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["seminperinat.com","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Seminars in Perinatology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]},"DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,2]],"date-time":"2015-09-02T06:46:35Z","timestamp":1441176395000},"page":"450-458","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Timing of induction of labor"],"prefix":"10.1053","volume":"39","author":[{"given":"Stephen J.","family":"Bacak","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Courtney","family":"Olson-Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Eva","family":"Pressman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib1","series-title":"NCHS data brief, no 155","article-title":"Recent declines in induction of labor by gestational age","author":"Osterman","year":"2014"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"g2301","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.g2301","article-title":"Chronic hypertension and pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"348","author":"Bramham","year":"2014","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"134.e131","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.10.878","article-title":"Prevalence, trends, and outcomes of chronic hypertension: a nationwide sample of delivery admissions","volume":"206","author":"Bateman","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib4","series-title":"NCHS data brief, no 21","article-title":"Delayed childbearing: more women are having their first child later in life","author":"Matthews","year":"2009"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"301.e301","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.11.011","article-title":"Hypertension and antihypertensive drugs in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes","volume":"208","author":"Orbach","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"966","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000205","article-title":"Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with mild chronic hypertension before 20 weeks of gestation","volume":"123","author":"Ankumah","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02754.x","article-title":"Optimal timing of delivery in pregnancies with pre-existing hypertension","volume":"118","author":"Hutcheon","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"908","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000428648.75548.00","article-title":"ACOG committee opinion no. 560: medically indicated late-preterm and early-term deliveries","volume":"121","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9694","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"979","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)60736-4","article-title":"Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks\u02bc gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial","volume":"374","author":"Koopmans","year":"2009","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib10","first-page":"1122","article-title":"Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists\u02bc Task Force on hypertension in pregnancy","volume":"122","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib11","first-page":"24","article-title":"Pregnancy outcomes in healthy nulliparas who developed hypertension. Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention Study Group","volume":"95","author":"Hauth","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.120080","article-title":"Adverse perinatal outcomes are significantly higher in severe gestational hypertension than in mild preeclampsia","volume":"186","author":"Buchbinder","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"979","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.112905","article-title":"Mild gestational hypertension remote from term: progression and outcome","volume":"184","author":"Barton","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44.e41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.08.030","article-title":"Elective delivery at 340\/7 to 366\/7 weeks\u02bc gestation and its impact on neonatal outcomes in women with stable mild gestational hypertension","volume":"204","author":"Barton","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"214.e211","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.06.009","article-title":"What is the optimal time for delivery in women with gestational hypertension","volume":"207","author":"Cruz","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.05.005","article-title":"Global and regional estimates of preeclampsia and eclampsia: a systematic review","volume":"170","author":"Abalos","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"f6564","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.f6564","article-title":"Pre-eclampsia rates in the United States, 1980\u20132010: age-period-cohort analysis","volume":"347","author":"Ananth","year":"2013","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.02.010","article-title":"The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia","volume":"33","author":"Duley","year":"2009","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"406.e401","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.06.059","article-title":"Neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with preeclampsia or gestational hypertension and in normotensive pregnancies that delivered at 35, 36, or 37 weeks of gestation","volume":"197","author":"Habli","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib20","first-page":"1070","article-title":"Aggressive or expectant management for patients with severe preeclampsia between 28\u201334 weeks\u02bc gestation: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"76","author":"Odendaal","year":"1990","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"818","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(94)90104-X","article-title":"Aggressive versus expectant management of severe preeclampsia at 28 to 32 weeks\u02bc gestation: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"171","author":"Sibai","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.02014.x","article-title":"A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation","volume":"110","author":"GRIT Study Group","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib23","first-page":"175","article-title":"Severe preterm preeclampsia: aggressive or expectant management","volume":"71","author":"Mesbah","year":"2003","journal-title":"Med J Cairo Univ"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib24","first-page":"Cd003106","article-title":"Interventionist versus expectant care for severe pre-eclampsia between 24 and 34 weeks\u02bc gestation","volume":"7","author":"Churchill","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.10.5.305.311","article-title":"Labor induction for the preterm severe pre-eclamptic patient: is it worth the effort","volume":"10","author":"Blackwell","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"921","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.124041","article-title":"Severe preeclampsia and delivery outcomes: is immediate cesarean delivery beneficial","volume":"186","author":"Coppage","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib27","first-page":"485","article-title":"Severe preeclampsia and the very low birth weight infant: is induction of labor harmful","volume":"93","author":"Alexander","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2010.118","article-title":"Antepartum eclampsia <34 weeks case series: advisable to postpone delivery to administer corticosteroids for fetal pulmonary benefit","volume":"31","author":"Tam Tam","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"issue":"222","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib29","first-page":"1","article-title":"Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2002","volume":"10","author":"Lethbridge-Cejku","year":"2004","journal-title":"Vital Health Stat"},{"issue":"14","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1884","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.290.14.1884","article-title":"Lifetime risk for diabetes mellitus in the United States","volume":"290","author":"Narayan","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Am Med Assoc"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"675","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200503000-00049","article-title":"Practice bulletin no. 60: Pregestational Diabetes Mellitus","volume":"105","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM197602122940702","article-title":"Association between maternal diabetes and the respiratory-distress syndrome in the newborn","volume":"294","author":"Robert","year":"1976","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"611","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90631-R","article-title":"Insulin-requiring diabetes in pregnancy: a randomized trial of active induction of labor and expectant management","volume":"169","author":"Kjos","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib34","first-page":"406","article-title":"Practice Bulletin No. 137 : Gestational Diabetes Mellitus","volume":"122","author":"Committee on Practice Bulletins\u2014Obstetrics","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"19","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1991","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa0707943","article-title":"Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes","volume":"358","author":"Metzger","year":"2008","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-994344","article-title":"Induction of labor at 38 to 39 weeks of gestation reduces the incidence of shoulder dystocia in gestational diabetic patients class A2","volume":"13","author":"Lurie","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309.e301","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.01.014","article-title":"The risk of stillbirth and infant death stratified by gestational age in women with gestational diabetes","volume":"206","author":"Rosenstein","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-88-4-487","article-title":"Prevalence of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in Chile","volume":"88","author":"Reyes","year":"1978","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e9","DOI":"10.1017\/S1462399408000628","article-title":"Molecular pathogenesis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy","volume":"10","author":"Arrese","year":"2008","journal-title":"Expert Rev Mol Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1002\/hep.510260216","article-title":"Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a French prospective study","volume":"26","author":"Bacq","year":"1997","journal-title":"Hepatology"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"676","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00167.x","article-title":"Clinical outcome in a series of cases of obstetric cholestasis identified via a patient support group","volume":"111","author":"Williamson","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1669","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.2005-1801","article-title":"Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome","volume":"117","author":"Zecca","year":"2006","journal-title":"Pediatrics"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"890","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(94)70304-3","article-title":"Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a retrospective case\u2013control study of perinatal outcome","volume":"170","author":"Rioseco","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.058","article-title":"Primum non nocere: how active management became modus operandi for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy","volume":"211","author":"Henderson","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100.e101","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.07.026","article-title":"Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: maternal and fetal outcomes associated with elevated bile acid levels","volume":"212","author":"Brouwers","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(01)00463-8","article-title":"Obstetric cholestasis: outcome with active management","volume":"100","author":"Roncaglia","year":"2002","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib47","first-page":"1","article-title":"Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and timing of delivery","author":"Lo","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"911","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000428649.57622.a7","article-title":"ACOG committee opinion no. 561: Nonmedically Indicated Early-Term Deliveries","volume":"121","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1122","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000429658.85846.f9","article-title":"ACOG practice bulletin no. 134: Fetal Growth Restriction","volume":"121","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"c7087","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c7087","article-title":"Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT)","volume":"341","author":"Boers","year":"2010","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1721","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.33.10.1721","article-title":"Timing of delivery and neonatal outcomes for small-for-gestational-age fetuses","volume":"33","author":"Visentin","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.09.016","article-title":"Induction of labor for term small-for-gestational-age fetuses: what are the consequences","volume":"171","author":"Ofir","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"344.e341","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.01.015","article-title":"Neonatal morbidity after induction vs expectant monitoring in intrauterine growth restriction at term: a subanalysis of the DIGITAT RCT","volume":"206","author":"Boers","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"406.e401","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.02.003","article-title":"Effects on (neuro)developmental and behavioral outcome at 2 years of age of induced labor compared with expectant management in intrauterine growth-restricted infants: long-term outcomes of the DIGITAT trial","volume":"206","author":"van Wyk","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.07.017","article-title":"Economic analysis comparing induction of labour and expectant management for intrauterine growth restriction at term (DIGITAT trial)","volume":"170","author":"Vijgen","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib56","unstructured":"ACOG. Practice Bulletin No. 22: fetal macrosomia; 1991."},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ogx.0000435370.74455.a8","article-title":"Prevention, management, and outcomes of macrosomia: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis","volume":"68","author":"Rossi","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00149-X","article-title":"Induction of labor versus expectant management in macrosomia: a randomized study","volume":"89","author":"Gonen","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.940","article-title":"Accuracy of sonographically estimated fetal weight in 840 women with different pregnancy complications prior to induction of labor","volume":"23","author":"Ben-Haroush","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11042.x","article-title":"The relation between fetal abdominal circumference and birthweight: findings in 3512 pregnancies","volume":"104","author":"Smith","year":"1997","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.12.020","article-title":"Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: a review","volume":"193","author":"Chauhan","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib62","first-page":"CD000938","article-title":"Induction of labour for suspected fetal macrosomia","author":"Irion","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"5 Pt 1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"997","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200211000-00030","article-title":"Expectant management versus labor induction for suspected fetal macrosomia: a systematic review","volume":"100","author":"Sanchez-Ramos","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03248.x","article-title":"Impending macrosomia: will induction of labour modify the risk of caesarean delivery","volume":"119","author":"Cheng","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"9987","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2600","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)61904-8","article-title":"Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"385","author":"Boulvain","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2008.10.018","article-title":"Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"104","author":"Nabhan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.1159\/000083901","article-title":"Oligohydramnios in uncomplicated pregnancies beyond 40 completed weeks. A prospective, randomised, pilot study on maternal and neonatal outcomes","volume":"20","author":"Ek","year":"2005","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241.e241","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.06.013","article-title":"Perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by isolated oligohydramnios diagnosed before 37 weeks of gestation","volume":"205","author":"Melamed","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.03.011","article-title":"Perinatal outcomes of isolated oligohydramnios at term and post-term pregnancy: a systematic review of literature with meta-analysis","volume":"169","author":"Rossi","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00060.x","article-title":"Isolated oligohydramnios is not associated with adverse perinatal outcomes","volume":"111","author":"Zhang","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.10.039","article-title":"Induction of labor and perinatal outcome: the impact of the amniotic fluid index","volume":"129","author":"Alchalabi","year":"2006","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1473","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70393-5","article-title":"Perinatal outcome and amniotic fluid index in the antepartum and intrapartum periods: a meta-analysis","volume":"181","author":"Chauhan","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1159\/000095848","article-title":"Prostaglandin E2 induction of labor for isolated oligohydramnios in women with unfavorable cervix at term","volume":"22","author":"Danon","year":"2007","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"issue":"6 Pt 1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1354","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70019-0","article-title":"Does an amniotic fluid index of \u22645cm necessitate delivery in high-risk pregnancies? A case\u2013control study","volume":"180","author":"Magann","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib75","first-page":"589","article-title":"Amniotic fluid index in the uncomplicated term pregnancy. Prediction of outcome","volume":"46","author":"Rainford","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.17.2.129.132","article-title":"Induction of labor in women with oligohydramnios","volume":"17","author":"Venturini","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"519","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2009.099","article-title":"Body mass index, Bishop score, and sonographic measurement of the cervical length as predictors of successful labor induction in twin gestations","volume":"37","author":"Park","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31825f3643","article-title":"Induction of labor in twin compared with singleton pregnancies","volume":"120","author":"Taylor","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1159\/000010207","article-title":"Clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in twin pregnancy","volume":"49","author":"Suzuki","year":"2000","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"964","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2012.03356.x","article-title":"Elective birth at 37 weeks of gestation versus standard care for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy at term: the Twins Timing of Birth Randomised Trial","volume":"119","author":"Dodd","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib81","first-page":"CD003582","article-title":"Elective birth at 37 weeks\u02bc gestation for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy","volume":"2","author":"Dodd","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1685","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2008.03.053","article-title":"Mode of delivery and neonatal survival of infants with gastroschisis in Australia and New Zealand","volume":"43","author":"Abdel-Latif","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Pediatr Surg"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1776","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2014.09.021","article-title":"Spontaneous onset of labor, not route of delivery, is associated with prolonged length of stay in babies with gastroschisis","volume":"49","author":"Yang","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Pediatr Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1527","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.106852","article-title":"Is vaginal delivery preferable to elective cesarean delivery in fetuses with a known ventral wall defect","volume":"182","author":"How","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"990","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31828ec299","article-title":"Expectant management compared with elective delivery at 37 weeks for gastroschisis","volume":"121","author":"Baud","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"755","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2015.02.030","article-title":"The correlation between the time spent in utero and the severity of bowel matting in newborns with gastroschisis","volume":"50","author":"Youssef","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Pediatr Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib87","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70278-9","article-title":"The optimal route of delivery for fetal meningomyelocele","volume":"179","author":"Merrill","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(02)00033-7","article-title":"Route of delivery of fetuses with structural anomalies","volume":"106","author":"Anteby","year":"2003","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib89","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2012.04.015","article-title":"When is primary cesarean appropriate: fetal indications","volume":"36","author":"Simpson","year":"2012","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib90","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1005","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000239439.04364.9a","article-title":"Placental abruption","volume":"108","author":"Oyelese","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib91","first-page":"CD003247","article-title":"Interventions for treating placental abruption","volume":"1","author":"Neilson","year":"2003","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib92","first-page":"386","article-title":"ACOG practice bulletin no. 107: Induction of Labor","volume":"114","author":"ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins\u2014Obstetrics","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib93","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2009.02.005","article-title":"Abruptio placentae and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy","volume":"33","author":"Hall","year":"2009","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib94","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2013","volume":"64","author":"Martin","year":"2015","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib95","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1097","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01328.x","article-title":"Variation in rates of postterm birth in Europe: reality or artefact","volume":"114","author":"Zeitlin","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib96","first-page":"Cd007058","article-title":"Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy","volume":"4","author":"Whitworth","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib97","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241.e241","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.10.873","article-title":"Risk for postterm delivery after previous postterm delivery","volume":"196","author":"Kistka","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib98","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1003","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349.2010.500009","article-title":"Maternal risk factors for postterm pregnancy and cesarean delivery following labor induction","volume":"89","author":"Roos","year":"2010","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib99","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"720","DOI":"10.3109\/14767050903387086","article-title":"Non-anomalous stillbirth by gestational age: trends differ based on method of epidemiologic calculation","volume":"23","author":"Heuser","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"421.e421","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.015","article-title":"Increased neonatal mortality among normal-weight births beyond 41 weeks of gestation in California","volume":"199","author":"Bruckner","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib101","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"222","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.446","article-title":"Perinatal and maternal complications related to postterm delivery: a national register-based study, 1978\u20131993","volume":"189","author":"Olesen","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib102","first-page":"Cd004945","article-title":"Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term","volume":"6","author":"Gulmezoglu","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib103","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"950","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701416929","article-title":"Women\u02bcs experiences and attitudes towards expectant management and induction of labor for post-term pregnancy","volume":"86","author":"Heimstad","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib104","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"716","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(94)70269-1","article-title":"A clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in postterm pregnancy.","volume":"170","author":"The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib105","first-page":"120","article-title":"National trends in labor induction, 1989\u20131998","volume":"47","author":"Zhang","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007_bib106","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1288","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181fb7ece","article-title":"Neonatal outcomes after demonstrated fetal lung maturity before 39 weeks of gestation","volume":"116","author":"Bates","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Seminars in Perinatology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0146000515000798?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0146000515000798?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,19]],"date-time":"2018-09-19T16:00:22Z","timestamp":1537372822000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0146000515000798"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]},"references-count":106,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]}},"alternative-id":["S0146000515000798"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007","relation":{},"ISSN":["0146-0005"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0146-0005","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Timing of induction of labor","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Seminars in Perinatology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.007","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}