{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,20]],"date-time":"2026-09-20T21:44:55Z","timestamp":1789940695393,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":57,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,10,1]],"date-time":"2015-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1443657600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["seminperinat.com","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Seminars in Perinatology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]},"DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,2]],"date-time":"2015-09-02T06:30:15Z","timestamp":1441175415000},"page":"475-482","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":24,"title":["Measures of success: Prediction of successful labor induction"],"prefix":"10.1053","volume":"39","author":[{"given":"Kelly S.","family":"Gibson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Thaddeus P.","family":"Waters","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib1","first-page":"266","article-title":"Pelvic scoring for elective induction","volume":"24","author":"Bishop","year":"1964","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib2","article-title":"Births: final data for 2013","volume":"vol. 64 no 1","author":"Martin","year":"2015"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib3","first-page":"386","article-title":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: induction of labor","volume":"114","author":"ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins\u2014Obstetrics","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6 Pt 1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib4","first-page":"917","article-title":"Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term","volume":"95","author":"Maslow","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib5","first-page":"600","article-title":"Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women","volume":"94","author":"Seyb","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181eb6e9b","article-title":"Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with a favorable cervix","volume":"116","author":"Osmundson","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820caf12","article-title":"Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix","volume":"117","author":"Osmundson","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"249.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies","volume":"211","author":"Gibson","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"761","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182a6a4d0","article-title":"Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes","volume":"122","author":"Darney","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e2838","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.e2838","article-title":"Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study","volume":"344","author":"Stock","year":"2012","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"700","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.07.003","article-title":"Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational age","volume":"195","author":"Caughey","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00007","article-title":"Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy","volume":"151","author":"Caughey","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"502","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib13","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Induction of labor compared to expectant management in low-risk women and associated perinatal outcomes","volume":"207","author":"Cheng","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib14","first-page":"69","article-title":"Biology of parturition","author":"Norwitz","year":"2008"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200009000-00003","article-title":"Anatomy and physiology of the uterine cervix","volume":"43","author":"Ludmir","year":"2000","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"805","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182114ad2","article-title":"Using a simplified Bishop score to predict vaginal delivery","volume":"117","author":"Laughon","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050500139604","article-title":"Comparison of elective induction of labor with favorable Bishop scores versus expectant management: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"18","author":"Nielsen","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701245427","article-title":"Elective induction of labor: failure to follow guidelines and risk of cesarean delivery","volume":"86","author":"Le Ray","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"486","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib19","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Induction of labor in a contemporary obstetric cohort","volume":"206","author":"Laughon","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Issue 6","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib20","first-page":"CD004945","article-title":"Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term","author":"G\u00fclmezoglu","year":"2012","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"91","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib21","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Preterm induction of labor: predictors of vaginal delivery and labor curves","volume":"212","author":"Feghali","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1029","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000210528.32940.c6","article-title":"Comparison of labor progression between induced and noninduced multiparous women","volume":"107","author":"Hoffman","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"824","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.127142","article-title":"Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women","volume":"187","author":"Zhang","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"698","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000157436.68847.3b","article-title":"Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas","volume":"105","author":"Vahratian","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013","article-title":"Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores","volume":"120","author":"Gelisen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.12.005","article-title":"The risk of fetal death: current concepts of best gestational age for delivery","volume":"208","author":"Mandujano","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00386-X","article-title":"A United States national reference for fetal growth","volume":"87","author":"Alexander","year":"1996","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib28","unstructured":"ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins\u2014Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 22: Fetal Macrosomia. Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000152338.76759.38","article-title":"Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women","volume":"105","author":"Vrouenraets","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00149-X","article-title":"Induction of labor versus expectant management in macrosomia: a randomized study","volume":"89","author":"Gonen","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Issue 2","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib31","first-page":"CD000938","article-title":"Induction of labour for suspected fetal macrosomia","author":"Irion","year":"1998","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"14","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib32","first-page":"61904","article-title":"Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"385","author":"Boulvain","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03248.x","article-title":"Impending macrosomia: will induction of labour modify the risk of caesarean delivery?","volume":"119","author":"Cheng","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"7910","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"767","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(75)92435-6","article-title":"Elective induction of labour. A randomised prospective trial.","volume":"1","author":"Cole","year":"1975","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"24","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1587","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199206113262402","article-title":"Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial. The Canadian Multicenter Post-term Pregnancy Trial Group","volume":"326","author":"Hannah","year":"1992","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"c7087","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c7087","article-title":"Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT)","volume":"341","author":"Boers","year":"2010","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib37","unstructured":"NIH. Classification of Overweight and Obesity by BMI, Waist Circumference, and Associated Disease Risks. https:\/\/www.nhlbi.nih.gov\/health\/educational\/lose_wt\/BMI\/bmi_dis.htm. Accessed 08.04.15."},{"issue":"128","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib38","first-page":"e1","article-title":"The effect of maternal obesity on the rate of failed induction of labor","volume":"205","author":"Wolfe","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"244","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib39","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Contemporary labor patterns: the impact of maternal body mass index","volume":"205","author":"Kominiarek","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02889.x","article-title":"Maternal obesity and labour complications following induction of labour in prolonged pregnancy","volume":"118","author":"Arrowsmith","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"700","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib41","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Mode of delivery in women with class III obesity: planned cesarean compared with induction of labor","volume":"211","author":"Subramaniam","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1312","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.106249","article-title":"The relationship between maternal age and uterine dysfunction: a continuous effect throughout reproductive life","volume":"182","author":"Main","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"428.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.06.058","article-title":"Does length of labor vary by maternal age?","volume":"197","author":"Greenberg","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1018","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182a9c92c","article-title":"Contemporary labor patterns and maternal age","volume":"122","author":"Zaki","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050500274187","article-title":"Consequences of routine delivery at 38 weeks for A-2 gestational diabetes","volume":"18","author":"Rayburn","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"611","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90631-R","article-title":"Insulin-requiring diabetes in pregnancy: a randomized trial of active induction of labor and expectant management","volume":"169","author":"Kjos","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02754.x","article-title":"Optimal timing of delivery in pregnancies with pre-existing hypertension","volume":"118","author":"Hutcheon","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"14","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib48","article-title":"Immediate delivery versus expectant monitoring for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy between 34 and 37 weeks of gestation (HYPITAT-II): an open-label, randomised controlled trial","volume":"385","author":"Broekhuijsen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"9694","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"979","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)60736-4","article-title":"Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks\u2019 gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial","volume":"374","author":"Koopmans","year":"2009","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib50","article-title":"Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study","author":"Macfarlane","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1568","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(54)90311-7","article-title":"The graphic analysis of labor","volume":"68","author":"Friedman","year":"1954","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"419","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib52","first-page":"e1","article-title":"Changes in labor patterns over 50 years","volume":"206","author":"Laughon","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1281","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181fdef6e","article-title":"Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes","volume":"116","author":"Zhang","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318207887a","article-title":"Failed labor induction: toward an objective diagnosis","volume":"117","author":"Rouse","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"705","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000157437.10998.e7","article-title":"When has an induction failed?","volume":"105","author":"Simon","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026","article-title":"Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery","volume":"210","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College)","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012_bib57","unstructured":"NIH ClinicalTrials.gov. A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management (ARRIVE). https:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/ct2\/show\/NCT01990612. Accessed 29.04.15."}],"container-title":["Seminars in Perinatology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0146000515000841?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0146000515000841?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,19]],"date-time":"2018-09-19T16:00:23Z","timestamp":1537372823000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0146000515000841"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]},"references-count":57,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]}},"alternative-id":["S0146000515000841"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012","relation":{},"ISSN":["0146-0005"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0146-0005","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Measures of success: Prediction of successful labor induction","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Seminars in Perinatology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.012","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}