{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,19]],"date-time":"2026-01-19T15:37:00Z","timestamp":1768837020638,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":49,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,10,1]],"date-time":"2015-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1443657600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["seminperinat.com","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Seminars in Perinatology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]},"DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,2]],"date-time":"2015-09-02T11:04:19Z","timestamp":1441191859000},"page":"483-487","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":31,"title":["Failed induction of labor"],"prefix":"10.1053","volume":"39","author":[{"given":"Corina","family":"Schoen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Reshama","family":"Navathe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib1","unstructured":"Center for Disease Control and Prevention. VitalStats. National Center for Health Statistics Web site. \/nchs\/vitalstats.htm; Updated 24.02.10."},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib2","unstructured":"Cunningham F, Leveno K, Bloom S, Spong C, Hoffman B, Dashe J. Chapter 26 Induction and augmentation of labor. In: Williams Obstetrics. 24th ed. United States of America: McGraw-Hill; 2014;523"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gabbe S, Niebyl J, Galan H, et al. Chapter 14: Abnormal labor and induction of labor. In: Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders: 2012;287","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-1-4377-1935-2.00014-4"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib4","first-page":"386","article-title":"ACOG practice bulletin no. 107: induction of labor","volume":"114","author":"ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins\u2014Obstetrics","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib5","first-page":"120","article-title":"U.S. national trends in labor induction, 1989\u20131998","volume":"47","author":"Zhang","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib6","first-page":"164","article-title":"Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategies","volume":"100","author":"Rayburn","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"674","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12328","article-title":"Does induction of labour increase the risk of caesarean section? A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials in women with intact membranes","volume":"121","author":"Wood","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00007","article-title":"Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy","volume":"151","author":"Caughey","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"56.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.033","article-title":"Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated oral misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor","volume":"210","author":"Rouzi","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"705","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000157437.10998.e7","article-title":"When has an induction failed?","volume":"105","author":"Simon","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318207887a","article-title":"Failed labor induction: toward an objective diagnosis","volume":"117","author":"Rouse","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12846","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial of outpatient compared with inpatient cervical ripening with prostaglandin E(2) (OPRA study)","volume":"122","author":"Wilkinson","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1280","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000238","article-title":"Foley catheter compared with the controlled-release dinoprostone insert: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"123","author":"Edwards","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2013-0152","article-title":"Labor induction in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix: double balloon catheter versus dinoprostone","volume":"42","author":"Suffecool","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200609000-00018","article-title":"What is a failed labor induction?","volume":"49","author":"Lin","year":"2006","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5 Pt 1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib16","first-page":"671","article-title":"Criteria for failed labor induction: prospective evaluation of a standardized protocol","volume":"96","author":"Rouse","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1181","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182704880","article-title":"Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint eunice kennedy shriver national institute of child health and human development, society for maternal\u2013fetal medicine, and American college of obstetricians and gynecologists workshop","volume":"120","author":"Spong","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-195512000-00001","article-title":"Primigravid labor; a graphicostatistical analysis","volume":"6","author":"Friedman","year":"1955","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1281","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181fdef6e","article-title":"Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes","volume":"116","author":"Zhang","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"24","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1587","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199206113262402","article-title":"Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial. The Canadian multicenter post-term pregnancy trial group","volume":"326","author":"Hannah","year":"1992","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.09.022","article-title":"Association of induction of labor and uterine rupture in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean: a survival analysis","volume":"206","author":"Harper","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1029","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000210528.32940.c6","article-title":"Comparison of labor progression between induced and noninduced multiparous women","volume":"107","author":"Hoffman","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2012.722729","article-title":"Labor induction with prostaglandin E2: characteristics of response and prediction of failure","volume":"26","author":"Melamed","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"698","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000157436.68847.3b","article-title":"Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas","volume":"105","author":"Vahratian","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3 Pt 1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"628","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70265-6","article-title":"Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: a review of 7001 consecutive inductions","volume":"180","author":"Yeast","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"486.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.03.014","article-title":"Induction of labor in a contemporary obstetric cohort","volume":"206","author":"Laughon","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"625","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0032-1331024","article-title":"The bishop score as a predictor of labor induction success: a systematic review","volume":"30","author":"Kolkman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"176","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib28","first-page":"1","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor","volume":"176","author":"Caughey","year":"2009","journal-title":"Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep)"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.054","article-title":"Nonmedically indicated induction vs expectant treatment in term nulliparous women","volume":"212","author":"Bailit","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"562.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.07.023","article-title":"Predictors of failed trial of labor among women with an extremely obese body mass index","volume":"209","author":"Gunatilake","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.08.002","article-title":"The risk of prelabor and intrapartum cesarean delivery among overweight and obese women: possible preventive actions","volume":"212","author":"Hermann","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.03.051","article-title":"The effect of maternal obesity on the rate of failed induction of labor","volume":"205","author":"Wolfe","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib33","first-page":"452","article-title":"The association of maternal weight with cesarean risk, labor duration, and cervical dilation rate during labor induction","volume":"103","author":"Nuthalapaty","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"700.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.06.045","article-title":"Mode of delivery in women with class III obesity: planned cesarean compared with induction of labor","volume":"211","author":"Subramaniam","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.034","article-title":"Risk of cesarean in obese nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: elective induction vs expectant management at term","volume":"211","author":"Wolfe","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"502.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.09.019","article-title":"Induction of labor compared to expectant management in low-risk women and associated perinatal outcomes","volume":"207","author":"Cheng","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"761","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182a6a4d0","article-title":"Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes","volume":"122","author":"Darney","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e2838","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.e2838","article-title":"Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study","volume":"344","author":"Stock","year":"2012","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000254169.49346.e9","article-title":"Outcomes of induction of labor after one prior cesarean","volume":"109","author":"Grobman","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-014-3444-9","article-title":"Pregnancy outcomes of induced labor in women with previous cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"291","author":"Rossi","year":"2015","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"358.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.01.026","article-title":"Induction of labor versus expectant management for women with a prior cesarean delivery","volume":"212","author":"Palatnik","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000109148.23082.C1","article-title":"Cervical ripening with transcervical foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture","volume":"103","author":"Bujold","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"296","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12320","article-title":"Cervical ripening with foley catheter for induction of labor after cesarean section: a cohort study","volume":"93","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"882","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70319-4","article-title":"Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid women with one prior cesarean delivery","volume":"181","author":"Zelop","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1069","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000546","article-title":"Trends in spontaneous and indicated preterm delivery among singleton gestations in the united states, 2005\u20132012","volume":"124","author":"Gyamfi-Bannerman","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.07.035","article-title":"Preterm induction of labor: predictors of vaginal delivery and labor curves","volume":"212","author":"Feghali","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1159\/000166307","article-title":"Risk factors for cesarean delivery in preterm, term and post-term patients undergoing induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix","volume":"67","author":"Ennen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1210","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70133-4","article-title":"Severe preeclampsia remote from term: labor induction or elective cesarean delivery?","volume":"179","author":"Nassar","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1828","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(94)70360-4","article-title":"Factors relevant to mode of preterm delivery with syndrome of HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets)","volume":"170","author":"Magann","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Seminars in Perinatology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0146000515000853?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0146000515000853?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,7]],"date-time":"2020-09-07T21:54:11Z","timestamp":1599515651000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0146000515000853"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]},"references-count":49,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]}},"alternative-id":["S0146000515000853"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013","relation":{},"ISSN":["0146-0005"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0146-0005","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Failed induction of labor","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Seminars in Perinatology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}