{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,6]],"date-time":"2026-05-06T06:14:12Z","timestamp":1778048052035,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Georg Thieme Verlag KG","issue":"06","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Rehabilitation (Stuttg)"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Zusammenfassung<\/jats:title><jats:p>\n                    Ziel Der Studie Durchgef\u00fchrt wurde eine retrospektive Analyse der\n                    klinischen Ergebnisse und Komplikationsraten aller oberschenkelamputierten\n                    Patienten eines Zentrums, die mit dem neuesten Implantatdesign der sogenannten\n                    Endo-Exo-Femur-Prothese (EEFP, dritte Generation) versorgt wurden. Ziel ist es,\n                    spezifische Informationen zu Langzeitkomplikationen dieser\n                    Amputationsversorgungsform zu gewinnen.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n                    Methodik Im Januar 2019 wurden Daten aller Oberschenkelamputierten, die\n                    von 2010 bis 2016 an einer Akutklinik aus Schleswig-Holstein mit TOPS versorgt\n                    wurden, retrospektiv analysiert. Dies geschah unter besonderer\n                    Ber\u00fccksichtigung der postoperativen Komplikationen. Hierf\u00fcr\n                    wurden alle Untersuchungsbefunde der klinischen Routine-Nachsorge-Untersuchungen\n                    herangezogen. Die Komplikationen wurden unterteilt in Stomaprobleme,\n                    orthop\u00e4die-technische Probleme, Frakturen und Explantationen. Alle EEFPs\n                    besa\u00dfen das gleiche Implantatdesign (dritte Generation). Dieses\n                    Implantat findet derzeit als einziges TOPS in Deutschland klinische Anwendung.\n                    Eine deskriptive Statistik des Patientenkollektivs, sowie\n                    Verh\u00e4ltnisangaben \u00fcber aufgetretene Komplikationen wurden\n                    berechnet.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n                    Ergebnisse Insgesamt wurden in diesem Zeitraum 68 Implantationen\n                    durchgef\u00fchrt. Durchschnittliche Beobachtungszeit war 6,32 Jahre\n                    (\u00b12,16 Jahre). Das mittlere Alter der Patienten betrug 51,84\n                    Jahre\u00b112,12 Jahre. Ursache der Amputation waren \u00fcberwiegend\n                    Traumata (82,35%). Stoma-assoziierte Probleme zeigten mit 7% die\n                    h\u00f6chste Inzidenz innerhalb aller beobachteten, patientenassoziierten\n                    Komplikationen und stellten die gr\u00f6\u00dften Herausforderungen\n                    w\u00e4hrend des Rehabilitationsprozesses dar. Betrachtet man nur die\n                    chirurgischen Komplikationen, so hatten 81% \u00fcberhaupt keine\n                    Komplikationen. Insgesamt wiesen 15% orthop\u00e4die-technische\n                    Probleme auf, 6% eine peri-prothetische Fraktur, 7% Probleme am\n                    Stoma und 3% mussten aufgrund einer Infektion explantiert werden.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n                    Schlussfolgerung Die erhobene Datenanalyse zeigt, dass TOPS (hier die\n                    EEFP der dritten Generation) eine erfolgreiche alternative Behandlungsmethode\n                    zur Schaftprothesenversorgung f\u00fcr Patienten mit\n                    Oberschenkelknochenverlust darstellen k\u00f6nnen. Die Indikation sollte erst\n                    nach dem Versagen einer Schaftversorgung erfolgen und Kontraindikationen\n                    m\u00fcssen umfassend ausgeschlossen werden. Die gr\u00f6\u00dften\n                    Herausforderungen im Rehabilitationsprozess stellen die Vermeidung von\n                    Stomakomplikationen, Infektionen und orthop\u00e4die-technischen Problemen\n                    dar. Die Rehabilitation von Amputierten, die mit TOPS behandelt werden,\n                    erfordert daher ein interdisziplin\u00e4res, spezialisiertes\n                    Rehabilitations-Team und eine lebenslange rehabilitative Versorgung.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1055\/a-1223-3205","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,1]],"date-time":"2020-09-01T00:18:48Z","timestamp":1598919528000},"page":"357-365","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Transkutane osseointegrierte Prothesensysteme (TOPS) zur Versorgung\n                    Oberschenkelamputierter"],"prefix":"10.1055","volume":"59","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1699-0577","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alexander","family":"Ranker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Klinik f\u00fcr Rehabilitationsmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule\n                    Hannover"},{"name":"Klinik f\u00fcr Unfallchirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule\n                    Hannover"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Marcus","family":"\u00d6rgel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Klinik f\u00fcr Unfallchirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule\n                    Hannover"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"James Peter","family":"Beck","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Klinik f\u00fcr Veteranenangelegenheiten, Salt Lake City,\n                    USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Christian","family":"Krettek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Klinik f\u00fcr Unfallchirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule\n                    Hannover"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Horst Heinrich","family":"Aschoff","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Klinik f\u00fcr Unfallchirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule\n                    Hannover"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"194","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1007\/s10039-010-1678-8","article-title":"Endo-Exo-Prothese","volume":"13","author":"H H Aschoff","year":"2011","journal-title":"Trauma Berufskrankh"},{"key":"ref2","first-page":"462","volume":"23","author":"H H Aschoff","year":"2011","journal-title":"Implantation der Endo-Exo-Femurprothese zur Verbesserung der\n                    Mobilit\u00e4t amputierter Patienten.Oper Orthop Traumatol"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1682\/JRRD.2014.11.0280","article-title":"Fifteen years of experience with Integral-Leg-Prosthesis: Cohort study of\n                artificial limb attachment system","volume":"52","author":"D L Juhnke","year":"2015","journal-title":"JRRD"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"306","DOI":"10.1007\/s00113-016-0296-8","article-title":"Osseointegrated Prosthetic Limb for the treatment of lower limb amputations","volume":"120","author":"M Al Muderis","year":"2017","journal-title":"Unfallchirurg"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1007\/s00113-017-0331-4","article-title":"Osseointegrated prostheses for rehabilitation following amputation","volume":"120","author":"Y Li","year":"2017","journal-title":"Unfallchirurg"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1237","DOI":"10.1002\/jor.23376","article-title":"Periprosthetic cortical bone remodeling in patients with an osseointegrated leg\n                    prosthesis","volume":"35","author":"L M Haket","year":"2017","journal-title":"JOR"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1045","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2016.1186752","article-title":"Comparison of bone-anchored prostheses and socket prostheses for patients with a\n                    lower extremity amputation: a systematic review","volume":"39","author":"R A Leijendekkers","year":"2017","journal-title":"Disabil Rehabil"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e743","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-D-17-00621","article-title":"Osseointegrated percutaneous prosthetic system for the treatment of patients\n                    with transfemoral amputation: a prospective five-year follow-up of\n                    patient-reported outcomes and complications","volume":"27","author":"R P Br\u00e5nemark","year":"2019","journal-title":"JAAOS"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e10","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.RVW.17.00037","article-title":"Osseointegration for lower-limb amputation: a systematic review of clinical\n                    outcomes","volume":"5","author":"J S Hebert","year":"2017","journal-title":"JBJS reviews"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1007\/s12283-016-0196-8","article-title":"Direct skeletal attachment prosthesis for the amputee athlete: the unknown\n                    potential","volume":"19","author":"M Al Muderis","year":"2016","journal-title":"Sports Engineering"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"900","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.15.00808","article-title":"Safety of osseointegrated implants for transfemoral amputees: a two-center\n                    prospective cohort study","volume":"98","author":"M Al Muderis","year":"2016","journal-title":"JBJS"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2120","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2014.07.009","article-title":"Outcome of percutaneous osseointegrated prostheses for patients with unilateral\n                    transfemoral amputation at two-year follow-up","volume":"95","author":"K Hagberg","year":"2014","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"ref13","first-page":"278","article-title":"Transcutaneous osseointegration after limb amputation: A review over 27\n                    years","volume":"120","author":"H-H Aschoff","year":"2017","journal-title":"Unfallchirurg"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1007\/s00113-016-0302-1","article-title":"Osseointegrated prosthesis for patients with an amputation","volume":"120","author":"JP M Fr\u00f6lke","year":"2017","journal-title":"Unfallchirurg"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2781","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-010-1370-0","article-title":"Osseointegrated titanium implants for limb prostheses attachments: infectious\n                    complications","volume":"468","author":"J Tillander","year":"2010","journal-title":"CORR"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1243","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinbiomech.2008.06.012","article-title":"FE stress analysis of the interface between the bone and an osseointegrated\n                    implant for amputees\u2013implications to refine the rehabilitation\n                    program","volume":"23","author":"WC C Lee","year":"2008","journal-title":"Clin biomech"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinbiomech.2007.02.005","article-title":"Kinetics of transfemoral amputees with osseointegrated fixation performing\n                    common activities of daily living","volume":"22","author":"WC C Lee","year":"2007","journal-title":"Clin biomech"},{"key":"ref18","first-page":"175","article-title":"Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation: a review","volume":"38","author":"R Branemark","year":"2001","journal-title":"JRRD"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0201821","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0201821","article-title":"Complications of bone-anchored prostheses for individuals with an extremity\n                    amputation: A systematic review","volume":"13","author":"R Atallah","year":"2018","journal-title":"PloS one"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3100","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-017-5507-2","article-title":"Osteomyelitis risk in patients with transfemoral amputations treated with\n                    osseointegration prostheses","volume":"475","author":"J Tillander","year":"2017","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2418","DOI":"10.1007\/s10439-010-9966-9","article-title":"A comparative finite-element analysis of bone failure and load transfer of\n                    osseointegrated prostheses fixations","volume":"38","author":"P K Tomaszewski","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ann Biomed Eng"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"484","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-016-1341-z","article-title":"Long-term outcomes following lower extremity press-fit bone-anchored prosthesis\n                    surgery: a 5-year longitudinal study protocol","volume":"17","author":"R A Leijendekkers","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1177\/0269215518815215","article-title":"Functional performance and safety of bone-anchored prostheses in persons with a\n                    transfemoral or transtibial amputation: a prospective one-year follow-up cohort\n                    study","volume":"33","author":"R A Leijendekkers","year":"2019","journal-title":"Clin rehabil"},{"key":"ref24","first-page":"607","article-title":"10 Jahre Endo-Exo-Femurprothetik zur Rehabilitation nach\n                    Oberschenkelamputation\u2013Daten, Fakten und Ergebnisse","volume":"150","author":"H H Aschoff","year":"2012","journal-title":"Z Orthop Unfall"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2174","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2013.05.020","article-title":"Walking ability and quality of life in subjects with transfemoral amputation: a\n                    comparison of osseointegration with socket prostheses","volume":"94","author":"H van de Meent","year":"2013","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.J.00806","article-title":"Transcutaneous, distal femoral, intramedullary attachment for above-the-knee\n                    prostheses: an endo-exo device","volume":"92","author":"H H Aschoff","year":"2010","journal-title":"JBJS"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2645","DOI":"10.1002\/jor.24421","article-title":"Analysis of the Stomal Microbiota of a Percutaneous Osseointegrated Prosthesis:\n                A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study","volume":"37","author":"J P Beck","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Orthop Res"},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1007\/s10856-017-5980-x","article-title":"A 24-month evaluation of a percutaneous osseointegrated limb-skin interface in\n                    an ovine amputation model","volume":"28","author":"S Jeyapalina","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Mater Sci Mater Med"},{"key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1682\/JRRD.2008.06.0080","article-title":"One hundred patients treated with osseointegrated transfemoral amputation\n                prostheses \u2013 rehabilitation perspective","volume":"46","author":"K Hagberg","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Rehabil Res Dev"}],"container-title":["Die Rehabilitation"],"original-title":[],"language":"de","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/products\/ejournals\/pdf\/10.1055\/a-1223-3205.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,7]],"date-time":"2020-12-07T23:46:42Z","timestamp":1607384802000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/DOI\/DOI?10.1055\/a-1223-3205"}},"subtitle":["Eine sechsj\u00e4hrige retrospektive Analyse des aktuellen\n                    Prothesendesigns in Deutschland"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,31]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"06","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,7]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,12]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/a-1223-3205","relation":{},"ISSN":["0034-3536","1439-1309"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0034-3536","type":"print"},{"value":"1439-1309","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,31]]}}}