{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,8]],"date-time":"2026-10-08T12:38:23Z","timestamp":1791463103927,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":71,"publisher":"Georg Thieme Verlag KG","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,25]],"date-time":"2020-09-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1600992000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Fetal or intrauterine growth restriction (FGR\/IUGR) affects approximately 5\u200a\u2013\u200a8% of all pregnancies and refers to a fetus not exploiting its genetically determined growth potential. Not only a major cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality, it also predisposes these fetuses to the development of chronic disorders in later life. Apart from the timely diagnosis and identification of the causes of FGR, the obstetric challenge primarily entails continued antenatal management with optimum timing of delivery. In order to minimise premature birth morbidity, intensive fetal monitoring aims to prolong the pregnancy and at the same time intervene, i.e. deliver, before the fetus is threatened or harmed. It is important to note that early-onset FGR (&lt;\u200932\u2009+\u20090 weeks of gestation [wks]) should be assessed differently than late-onset FGR (\u2265\u200932\u2009+\u20090 wks). In early-onset FGR progressive deterioration is reflected in abnormal venous Doppler parameters, while in late-onset FGR this manifests primarily in abnormal cerebral Doppler ultrasound. According to our current understanding, the \u201coptimum\u201d approach for monitoring and timing of delivery in early-onset FGR combines computerized CTG with the ductus venosus Doppler, while in late-onset FGR assessment of the cerebral Doppler parameters becomes more important.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1055\/a-1232-1418","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,25]],"date-time":"2020-09-25T23:15:55Z","timestamp":1601075755000},"page":"1016-1025","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":18,"title":["Fetal Growth Restriction \u2013 Diagnostic Work-up, Management and Delivery"],"prefix":"10.1055","volume":"80","author":[{"given":"Dietmar","family":"Schlembach","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Vivantes \u2013 Netzwerk f\u00fcr Gesundheit GmbH, Klinikum Neuk\u00f6lln, Klinik f\u00fcr Geburtsmedizin, Berlin, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"194","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1157","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0043-118908","article-title":"Intrauterine Growth Restriction. Guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No.\u2009015\/080, October 2016)","volume":"77","author":"S Kehl","year":"2017","journal-title":"Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1806","article-title":"Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome?","volume":"25","author":"P G Lindqvist","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1042\/cs0950115","article-title":"In utero programming of chronic disease","volume":"95","author":"D J Barker","year":"1998","journal-title":"Clin Sci (Lond)"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"270","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200606000-00009","article-title":"Adult consequences of fetal growth restriction","volume":"49","author":"D J Barker","year":"2006","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200606000-00008","article-title":"Perinatal outcome and later implications of intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"49","author":"E K Pallotto","year":"2006","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"807","DOI":"10.1113\/JP271402","article-title":"The consequences of fetal growth restriction on brain structure and neurodevelopmental outcome","volume":"594","author":"S L Miller","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Physiol"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.11204","article-title":"Fetal growth: a review of terms, concepts and issues relevant to obstetrics","volume":"41","author":"C Mayer","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.11.022","article-title":"Definition and management of fetal growth restriction: a survey of contemporary attitudes","volume":"174","author":"J Unterscheider","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"290.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.02.007","article-title":"Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: the multicenter prospective PORTO Study","volume":"208","author":"J Unterscheider","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.1016\/j.siny.2017.02.009","article-title":"Classification of causes and associated conditions for stillbirths and neonatal deaths","volume":"22","author":"V Flenady","year":"2017","journal-title":"Semin Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15884","article-title":"Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure","volume":"48","author":"S J Gordijn","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref12","volume-title":"Die Plazenta \u2013 Grundlagen und klinische Bedeutung","author":"B Huppertz","year":"2018"},{"issue":"07","key":"ref13","first-page":"CD007058","article-title":"Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy","author":"M Whitworth","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2008.00830.x","article-title":"Prediction of small for gestational age newborns using ultrasound estimated and actual amniotic fluid volume: published data revisited","volume":"48","author":"S P Chauhan","year":"2008","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1573","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2011.30.11.1573","article-title":"Amniotic fluid and the clinical relevance of the sonographically estimated amniotic fluid volume: oligohydramnios","volume":"30","author":"E F Magann","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"674","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14924","article-title":"Single deepest vertical pocket or amniotic fluid index as evaluation test for predicting adverse pregnancy outcome (SAFE trial): a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial","volume":"47","author":"S Kehl","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90491-Z","article-title":"Fetal growth retardation: associated malformations and chromosomal abnormalities","volume":"168","author":"R J Snijders","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2018.02.008","article-title":"Universal screening for foetal growth restriction","volume":"49","author":"G CS Smith","year":"2018","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19077","article-title":"Prediction and prevention of small-for-gestational-age neonates: evidence from SPREE and ASPRE","volume":"52","author":"M Y Tan","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.070430","article-title":"Use of uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography to predict pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review and bivariable meta-analysis","volume":"178","author":"J S Cnossen","year":"2008","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"issue":"09","key":"ref21","first-page":"CD008363","article-title":"Utero-placental Doppler ultrasound for improving pregnancy outcome","author":"T Stampalija","year":"2010","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1012063","article-title":"Predictive value of angiogenic factors, clinical risk factors and uterine artery Doppler for pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction in second and third trimester pregnancies in an Ecuadorian population","volume":"29","author":"C Kienast","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1016\/S2352-4642(18)30129-9","article-title":"Screening for fetal growth restriction using ultrasound and the sFLT1\/PlGF ratio in nulliparous women: a prospective cohort study","volume":"2","author":"F Gaccioli","year":"2018","journal-title":"Lancet Child Adolesc Health"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e16069","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000016069","article-title":"Better prediction for FGR (fetal growth restriction) with the sFlt-1\/PIGF ratio: A case-control study","volume":"98","author":"V Visan","year":"2019","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20414","article-title":"Antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction and risk of stillbirth: population-based case-control study","volume":"55","author":"A Ego","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"715","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20272","article-title":"ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth","volume":"53","author":"L J Salomon","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S790","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.003","article-title":"Diagnosis and surveillance of late-onset fetal growth restriction","volume":"218","author":"F Figueras","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2089","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00131-2","article-title":"Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study","volume":"386","author":"U Sovio","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.09.043","article-title":"Diagnostic performance of third-trimester ultrasound for the prediction of late-onset fetal growth restriction: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"220","author":"J Caradeux","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"866","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2017.1300646","article-title":"Fetal growth pathology score: a novel ultrasound parameter for individualized assessment of third trimester growth abnormalities","volume":"31","author":"R L Deter","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2016.09.003","article-title":"Role of uteroplacental and fetal Doppler in identifying fetal growth restriction at term","volume":"38","author":"A Khalil","year":"2017","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"ref32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1159\/000485124","article-title":"Fetal Biometry and Doppler Study for the Assessment of Perinatal Outcome in Stage I Late-Onset Fetal Growth Restriction","volume":"44","author":"C Villalain","year":"2018","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"ref33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000490","article-title":"Clinical significance of cerebroplacental ratio","volume":"30","author":"E Kalafat","year":"2018","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1703","DOI":"10.21873\/invivo.11659","article-title":"Correlation of Cerebroplacental Ratio (CPR) With Adverse Perinatal Outcome in Singleton Pregnancies","volume":"33","author":"B Gruttner","year":"2019","journal-title":"In Vivo"},{"key":"ref35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.18809","article-title":"Prognostic accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery Doppler for adverse perinatal outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"51","author":"C A Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2554","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1441281","article-title":"Added value of cerebro-placental ratio and uterine artery Doppler at routine third trimester screening as a predictor of SGA and FGR in non-selected pregnancies","volume":"32","author":"M Rial-Crestelo","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"ref37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1016\/j.preghy.2018.04.010","article-title":"Predictive value of sFlt-1, PlGF, sFlt-1\/PlGF ratio and PAPP-A for late-onset preeclampsia and IUGR between 32 and 37weeks of pregnancy","volume":"12","author":"C Birdir","year":"2018","journal-title":"Pregnancy Hypertens"},{"key":"ref38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1016\/j.preghy.2018.06.017","article-title":"Clinical implementation of the sFlt-1\/PlGF ratio to identify preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction: A prospective cohort study","volume":"13","author":"I Herraiz","year":"2018","journal-title":"Pregnancy Hypertens"},{"key":"ref39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1704559","article-title":"Aspirin versus Placebo in Pregnancies at High Risk for Preterm Preeclampsia","volume":"377","author":"D L Rolnik","year":"2017","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"ref40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"336","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-019-2456-7","article-title":"Does Pentaerytrithyltetranitrate reduce fetal growth restriction in pregnancies complicated by uterine mal-perfusion? Study protocol of the PETN-study: a randomized controlled multicenter-trial","volume":"19","author":"T Groten","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"ref41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2018.02.009","article-title":"Planning management and delivery of the growth-restricted fetus","volume":"49","author":"A A Baschat","year":"2018","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"ref42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1159\/000357592","article-title":"Update on the diagnosis and classification of fetal growth restriction and proposal of a stage-based management protocol","volume":"36","author":"F Figueras","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"ref43","first-page":"908","article-title":"Screening for fetal growth restriction: a mathematical model of the effect of time interval and ultrasound error","volume":"92","author":"M Mongelli","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(00)00423-1","article-title":"Development of the placental villous tree and its consequences for fetal growth","volume":"92","author":"J Kingdom","year":"2000","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"ref45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5386","article-title":"Progression of Doppler abnormalities in intrauterine growth restriction","volume":"32","author":"O M Turan","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(00)70494-7","article-title":"A pilot randomized controlled trial of two regimens of fetal surveillance for small-for-gestational-age fetuses with normal results of umbilical artery doppler velocimetry","volume":"182 (1 Pt 1)","author":"L M McCowan","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.9011","article-title":"Duration of persistent abnormal ductus venosus flow and its impact on perinatal outcome in fetal growth restriction","volume":"38","author":"O M Turan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7618","article-title":"The fetal venous system, part I: normal embryology, anatomy, hemodynamics, ultrasound evaluation and Doppler investigation","volume":"35","author":"S Yagel","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.11.028","article-title":"Venous Doppler in the prediction of acid-base status of growth-restricted fetuses with elevated placental blood flow resistance","volume":"191","author":"A A Baschat","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1992.02040266.x","article-title":"Potential for diagnosing imminent risk to appropriate- and small-for-gestational-age fetuses by Doppler sonographic examination of umbilical and cerebral arterial blood flow","volume":"2","author":"K Hecher","year":"1992","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)90161-2","article-title":"Fetal venous, intracardiac, and arterial blood flow measurements in intrauterine growth retardation: relationship with fetal blood gases","volume":"173","author":"K Hecher","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"521.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.01.001","article-title":"Is middle cerebral artery Doppler related to neonatal and 2-year infant outcome in early fetal growth restriction?","volume":"216","author":"T Stampalija","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15729","article-title":"Value of third-trimester cerebroplacental ratio and uterine artery Doppler indices as predictors of stillbirth and perinatal loss","volume":"47","author":"A Khalil","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14647","article-title":"Poor neonatal acid-base status in term fetuses with low cerebroplacental ratio","volume":"45","author":"J Morales-Rosello","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.06.026","article-title":"An abnormal cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) is predictive of early childhood delayed neurodevelopment in the setting of fetal growth restriction","volume":"221","author":"C Monteith","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"288.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.05.008","article-title":"The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: results of the multicenter PORTO Study","volume":"211","author":"K Flood","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1515\/jpme.1996.24.1.25","article-title":"Improvements in computerized fetal heart rate analysis antepartum","volume":"24","author":"G S Dawes","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"ref58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(99)00162-1","article-title":"Fetal heart rate in relation to its variation in normal and growth retarded fetuses","volume":"89","author":"I JM Nijhuis","year":"2000","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"ref59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2004.05.012","article-title":"Computerized cardiotocography in the management of intrauterine growth restriction associated with Doppler velocimetry alterations","volume":"86","author":"M M Anceschi","year":"2004","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"ref60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1101","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01774.x","article-title":"The value of the short-term fetal heart rate variation for timing the delivery of growth-retarded fetuses","volume":"115","author":"V Serra","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2162","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)62049-3","article-title":"2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial","volume":"385","author":"C C Lees","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"ref62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/a-0972-1098","article-title":"Effects of Antenatal Betamethasone on Fetal Doppler Indices and Short Term Fetal Heart Rate Variation in Early Growth Restricted Fetuses","author":"N Fratelli","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultraschall Med"},{"key":"ref63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.07.010","article-title":"Reduced short-term variation following antenatal administration of betamethasone: Is reduced fetal size a predisposing factor?","volume":"216","author":"T Ghi","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"ref64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"813","DOI":"10.1055\/a-0903-2735","article-title":"Prevention and Therapy of Preterm Birth. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k Level, AWMF Registry Number 015\/025, February 2019) \u2013 Part 2 with Recommendations on the Tertiary Prevention of Preterm Birth and the Management of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes","volume":"79","author":"R Berger","year":"2019","journal-title":"Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd"},{"key":"ref65","first-page":"812","article-title":"Lungenreifeinduktion \u2013 exaktes Timing essentiell","volume":"58","author":"R Berger","year":"2017","journal-title":"Frauenarzt"},{"key":"ref66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.18815","article-title":"Severe fetal growth restriction at 26\u201332 weeks: key messages from the TRUFFLE study","volume":"50","author":"C M Bilardo","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20354","article-title":"Comparative analysis of 2-year outcomes in GRIT and TRUFFLE trials","volume":"55","author":"W Ganzevoort","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1159\/000319800","article-title":"Differences in neonatal outcome in fetuses with absent versus reverse end-diastolic flow in umbilical artery Doppler","volume":"28","author":"R P Vasconcelos","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"ref70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"400","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13190","article-title":"Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction: cohort outcomes of the trial of randomized umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE)","volume":"42","author":"C Lees","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000253215.79121.75","article-title":"Predictors of neonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction","volume":"109 (2 Pt 1)","author":"A A Baschat","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(04)16809-8","article-title":"Infant wellbeing at 2 years of age in the Growth Restriction Intervention Trial (GRIT): multicentred randomised controlled trial","volume":"364","author":"J G Thornton","year":"2004","journal-title":"Lancet"}],"container-title":["Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde"],"original-title":[],"language":"de","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/products\/ejournals\/pdf\/10.1055\/a-1232-1418.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,8]],"date-time":"2023-10-08T10:56:51Z","timestamp":1696762611000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/DOI\/DOI?10.1055\/a-1232-1418"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,25]]},"references-count":71,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,25]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/a-1232-1418","relation":{},"ISSN":["0016-5751","1438-8804"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0016-5751","type":"print"},{"value":"1438-8804","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,25]]}}}