{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,8]],"date-time":"2026-10-08T14:48:26Z","timestamp":1791470906031,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Georg Thieme Verlag KG","issue":"03","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Am J Perinatol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>\n                  Objective\u2003The aim of the study is to examine whether an estimated fetal weight of the current pregnancy greater than previous birth weight is associated with increased odds of intrapartum cesarean delivery.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n                  Study Design\u2003We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all women who had more than one singleton pregnancy at 23 weeks' gestation or greater at a single labor and delivery unit. We only analyzed the second pregnancy in the dataset. We excluded women who had preterm birth in the second pregnancy. Women were categorized according to the difference between estimated fetal weight and previous birth weight\u2014estimated fetal weight close to previous birth weight within 500\u2009g (similar weight group); estimated fetal weight significantly (more than 500\u2009g) greater than previous birth weight (larger weight group); and estimated fetal weight significantly (more than 500\u2009g) lower than previous birth weight (smaller weight group). The primary outcome was intrapartum cesarean delivery. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence interval (95% confidence interval [CI]) after adjusting for predefined covariates.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n                  Results\u2003Of 1,887 women, there were 1,415 (75%) in the similar weight group, 384 (20%) in the greater weight group, and 88 (5%) in the smaller weight group. Individuals in the larger weight group compared with those in the similar weight group had higher odds of undergoing intrapartum cesarean delivery (11.2 vs. 4.5%; aOR 2.91; 95% CI 1.91\u20134.45). The odds of intrapartum cesarean delivery in the smaller weight group compared with those in the similar weight group were not increased (3.4 vs. 4.5%; crude OR 0.75; 95%CI 0.23\u20132.42).<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n                  Conclusion\u2003The difference between current estimated fetal weight and previous birth weight plays an important role in assessing the risk of intrapartum cesarean delivery.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n                  Key Points\n               <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1055\/a-1673-5455","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,20]],"date-time":"2021-10-20T00:48:47Z","timestamp":1634690927000},"page":"276-281","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["The Rate of Intrapartum Cesarean Delivery Based on Estimated Fetal Weight in Comparison to Previous Child's Birth Weight"],"prefix":"10.1055","volume":"41","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2438-1699","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tetsuya","family":"Kawakita","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shobha","family":"Sridhar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4434-9066","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Neggin","family":"Mokhtari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Helain J.","family":"Landy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"194","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","volume-title":"Births: Final Data for 2019","author":"J A Martin","year":"2021"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"541","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000233154.62729.24","article-title":"Postpartum maternal mortality and cesarean delivery","volume":"108","author":"C Deneux-Tharaux","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2007.00205.x","article-title":"Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an \u201cintention-to-treat\u201d model","volume":"35","author":"M F MacDorman","year":"2008","journal-title":"Birth"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref4","first-page":"1","article-title":"Maternal morbidity for vaginal and cesarean deliveries, according to previous cesarean history: new data from the birth certificate, 2013","volume":"64","author":"S C Curtin","year":"2015","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1226","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000219750.79480.84","article-title":"Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries","volume":"107","author":"R M Silver","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-018-1895-x","article-title":"Association between first caesarean delivery and adverse outcomes in subsequent pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"18","author":"H T Hu","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1779","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(03)14896-9","article-title":"Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy","volume":"362","author":"G C Smith","year":"2003","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d","article-title":"Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstetric Care Consensus No. 1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","volume":"123","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001571","article-title":"Association of recorded estimated fetal weight and cesarean delivery in attempted vaginal delivery at term","volume":"128","author":"R J Froehlich","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"13","key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1297","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0038-1649482","article-title":"Association between sonographic estimated fetal weight and the risk of cesarean delivery among nulliparous women with diabetes in pregnancy","volume":"35","author":"A M Dude","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e18","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003606","article-title":"Macrosomia. ACOG practice bulletin no. 216. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","volume":"135","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"124","key":"ref12","first-page":"1","article-title":"Changes in cesarean delivery rates by gestational age: United States, 1996-2011","author":"M J Osterman","year":"2013","journal-title":"NCHS Data Brief"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.806474","article-title":"Clinical accuracy of estimated fetal weight in term pregnancies in a teaching hospital","volume":"27","author":"K R Goetzinger","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"08","key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"759","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0040-1721698","article-title":"Interpregnancy body mass index change and risk of intrapartum cesarean delivery","volume":"38","author":"T Kawakita","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"ref16","first-page":"CD000161","article-title":"Pelvimetry for fetal cephalic presentations at or near term for deciding on mode of delivery","volume":"3","author":"R C Pattinson","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"806","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000259312.36053.02","article-title":"Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"109","author":"W A Grobman","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00590-5","article-title":"Limitations of clinical and sonographic estimates of birth weight: experience with 1034 parturients","volume":"91","author":"S P Chauhan","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"566","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6378","article-title":"Comparison of fundal height measurement and sonographically measured fetal abdominal circumference in the prediction of high and low birth weight at term","volume":"34","author":"G Kayem","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Perinatology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/products\/ejournals\/pdf\/10.1055\/a-1673-5455.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,5]],"date-time":"2024-11-05T13:10:03Z","timestamp":1730812203000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/DOI\/DOI?10.1055\/a-1673-5455"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,19]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"03","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,6]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/a-1673-5455","archive":["Portico","CLOCKSS"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0735-1631","1098-8785"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0735-1631","type":"print"},{"value":"1098-8785","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,19]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,19]]}}}