{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,12]],"date-time":"2025-09-12T19:27:11Z","timestamp":1757705231128},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Georg Thieme Verlag KG","issue":"07","funder":[{"name":"NIH Grant","award":["R01 NR014245"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["R01 NR014245"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Am J Perinatol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>\n            Objective\u2003While twin gestations are at increased risk of severe maternal morbidity (SMM), there is limited information about timing and causes of SMM in twins. Furthermore, existing data rely on screening definitions of SMM because a gold standard approach requires chart review. We sought to determine the timing and cause of SMM in twins using a gold standard definition outlined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG).<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n            Study Design\u2003We used a perinatal database to identify all twin deliveries from 1998 to 2013 at a single academic medical center (n\u2009=\u20092,367). Deliveries were classified as screen positive for SMM if they met any of the following criteria: (1) one of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision diagnosis and procedure codes for SMM; (2) a prolonged postpartum length of stay (&gt;3 standard deviations beyond mean length of stay by mode of delivery); or (3) maternal intensive care unit admission. We identified true cases of SMM through medical record review of all screen-positive deliveries using the definition of SMM outlined in the ACOG Obstetric Care Consensus. We also determined cause and timing of SMM.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n            Results\u2003A total of 165 (7%) of twin deliveries screened positive for SMM. After chart review of all screen-positive cases, 2.4% (n\u2009=\u200956) were classified as a true case of SMM using the ACOG definition for a positive predictive value of 34%. The majority of SMM occurred postpartum (65%). Hemorrhage was the most common cause of SMM, followed by hypertensive and pulmonary etiologies.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n            Conclusion\u2003Commonly used approaches to screen for SMM perform poorly in twins. This has important implications for quality initiatives and epidemiologic studies that rely on screening definitions of maternal morbidity. Our study demonstrates that the immediate postpartum period is a critical time for maternal health among women with twin pregnancies.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n            Key Points\n          <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1055\/a-1974-4449","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,9]],"date-time":"2022-11-09T00:22:41Z","timestamp":1667953361000},"page":"704-710","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Severe Maternal Morbidity in Twins"],"prefix":"10.1055","volume":"40","author":[{"given":"Anna","family":"Binstock","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lisa M.","family":"Bodnar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Katherine P.","family":"Himes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania"},{"name":"Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"194","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,21]]},"reference":[{"issue":"02","key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2018.01.004","article-title":"Maternal mortality in the twenty-first century","volume":"45","author":"J A Ozimek","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"366","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002114","article-title":"Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 2011-2013","volume":"130","author":"A A Creanga","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2009.01.007","article-title":"Maternal near miss\u2013towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care","volume":"23","author":"L Say","year":"2009","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"13","key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1287","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0038-1649481","article-title":"Severe maternal morbidity and hospital cost among hospitalized deliveries in the United States","volume":"35","author":"H Y Chen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"627","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182a06f4e","article-title":"Maternal morbidity and risk of death at delivery hospitalization","volume":"122","author":"K H Campbell","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1029","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31826d60c5","article-title":"Severe maternal morbidity among delivery and postpartum hospitalizations in the United States","volume":"120","author":"W M Callaghan","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"670","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001635","article-title":"Obstetric Care Consensus No 5 Summary: severe maternal morbidity: screening and review","volume":"128","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000397","article-title":"Standardized severe maternal morbidity review: rationale and process","volume":"124","author":"S J Kilpatrick","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"B17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.07.050","article-title":"Severe maternal morbidity: screening and review","volume":"215","author":"S K Kilpatrick","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"978","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000218","article-title":"Facility-based identification of women with severe maternal morbidity: it is time to start","volume":"123","author":"W M Callaghan","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"422.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.03.036","article-title":"Impact of the ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM transition on the incidence of severe maternal morbidity among delivery hospitalizations in the United States","volume":"225","author":"A Metcalfe","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.12.020","article-title":"Identification of severe maternal morbidity during delivery hospitalizations, United States, 1991-2003","volume":"199","author":"W M Callaghan","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"643.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.11.004","article-title":"Measuring severe maternal morbidity: validation of potential measures","volume":"214","author":"E K Main","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"509.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.05.022","article-title":"Opportunities for improvement in care among women with severe maternal morbidity","volume":"215","author":"J A Ozimek","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.03.039","article-title":"Impact of fertility treatment on severe maternal morbidity","volume":"106","author":"E T Wang","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-018-2082-9","article-title":"Perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies complicated by maternal morbidity: evidence from the WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health","volume":"18","author":"D S Santana","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"641.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.11.003","article-title":"Severe acute maternal morbidity in multiple pregnancies: a nationwide cohort study","volume":"214","author":"T Witteveen","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1141","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003261","article-title":"Severe acute maternal morbidity in twin compared with singleton pregnancies","volume":"133","author":"H Madar","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"195.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.10.012","article-title":"Risk of severe maternal morbidity by maternal fertility status: a US study in 8 states","volume":"220","author":"B Luke","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001292","article-title":"Severe maternal morbidity and the use of assisted reproductive technology in Massachusetts","volume":"127","author":"C Belanoff","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"408","DOI":"10.1111\/ppe.12610","article-title":"Validation of criteria to identify severe maternal morbidity","volume":"34","author":"K P Himes","year":"2020","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Perinatology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/products\/ejournals\/pdf\/10.1055\/a-1974-4449.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,25]],"date-time":"2023-04-25T00:37:44Z","timestamp":1682383064000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/DOI\/DOI?10.1055\/a-1974-4449"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,8]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"07","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,24]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,5]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/a-1974-4449","archive":["Portico","CLOCKSS"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0735-1631","1098-8785"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0735-1631","type":"print"},{"value":"1098-8785","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,8]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,8]]}}}