{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,23]],"date-time":"2026-01-23T08:43:00Z","timestamp":1769157780987,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"Georg Thieme Verlag KG","issue":"S 01","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Am J Perinatol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>\n            Objective\u2003This study aimed to evaluate if a secondary repeat cesarean after a trial of labor (TOLAC) without uterine rupture is associated with increased morbidity as compared with a scheduled elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD).<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n            Study Design\u2003This was a retrospective cohort study of repeat cesarean delivery (CD) in a single obstetrical practice between 2005 and 2022. Patients were included if they had a singleton pregnancy at term with one prior CD and had a repeat CD this pregnancy resulting in live birth. Patients were excluded if they had a prior myomectomy, more than one prior CD, uterine rupture in a prior or current pregnancy, or placenta previa in this pregnancy. We compared baseline characteristics and outcomes between patients who had a repeat cesarean after TOLAC and ERCD. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal morbidity that included hysterectomy, blood transfusion, cystotomy, bowel injury, intensive care unit admission, thrombosis, reoperation, or maternal mortality.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n            Results\u2003A total of 930 women met inclusion criteria. A total of 176 (18.9%) patients intended to labor and 754 (81.1%) planned an ERCD. There was no difference in the primary outcome between patients with a repeat cesarean after TOLAC compared with patients with ERCD (2.8 vs. 1.2%, p\u2009=\u20090.158). Patients with repeat cesarean after labor had significantly more 1-minute Apgar scores less than 7, but no difference in 5-minute Apgar scores. We were powered to detect a difference in the primary outcome from 1.2% in the ERCD group to 3.3% in the repeat cesarean after labor group. Results did not differ when we analyzed patients who intended to TOLAC versus patients who actually labored prior CD.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n            Conclusion\u2003For women with one prior CD the morbidity of repeat cesarean after labor is not more than the morbidity of planned repeat CD. Our study can be helpful in delivery planning counseling for patients with one prior CD.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n            Key Points\n          <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1055\/a-2126-7613","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,11]],"date-time":"2023-07-11T22:40:37Z","timestamp":1689115237000},"page":"e2582-e2586","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"special_numbering":"S","title":["Morbidity of Repeat Cesarean Delivery after a Trial of Labor as Compared with Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery"],"prefix":"10.1055","volume":"41","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0215-6610","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Emily S.","family":"Markovic","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nathan S.","family":"Fox","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York"},{"name":"Maternal Fetal Medicine Associates, PLLC, New York, New York"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"194","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,17]]},"reference":[{"issue":"359","key":"ref1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Recent trends in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: United States, 2016-2018","author":"M JK Osterman","year":"2020","journal-title":"NCHS Data Brief"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref2","first-page":"537","article-title":"NIH consensus development statement on cesarean childbirth. The Cesarean Birth Task Force","volume":"54","year":"1981","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"07","key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1309","DOI":"10.1007\/s10995-012-1132-6","article-title":"Rates and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990-2009","volume":"17","author":"S F Uddin","year":"2013","journal-title":"Matern Child Health J"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"664.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2021.05.021","article-title":"Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in term gestations: a calculator without race and ethnicity","volume":"225","author":"W A Grobman","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"25","key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery","volume":"351","author":"M B Landon","year":"2004","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e110","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003078","article-title":"ACOG practice bulletin no. 205: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"133","author":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"945","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90032-E","article-title":"Uterine rupture after previous cesarean delivery: maternal and fetal consequences","volume":"169","author":"A S Leung","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref8","first-page":"477","article-title":"Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with spontaneous onset of labor at term","volume":"102","author":"V M Allen","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000215988.23224.e4","article-title":"Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with induction of labor at term","volume":"108","author":"V M Allen","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2003.00095.x","article-title":"Intraoperative surgical complication during cesarean section: an observational study of the incidence and risk factors","volume":"82","author":"T Bergholt","year":"2003","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-017-4445-2","article-title":"Comparison of maternal and fetal complications in elective and emergency cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"296","author":"X J Yang","year":"2017","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2013.818970","article-title":"Peripartum complications with cesarean delivery: a review of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network publications","volume":"27","author":"I A Hammad","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e248","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2020.05.001","article-title":"Women's experiences of intrapartum care and recovery in relation to planned caesarean sections: an interview study","volume":"34","author":"P Thirukumar","year":"2021","journal-title":"Women Birth"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1542-2011.2011.00106.x","article-title":"The importance of mode of birth after previous cesarean: success, satisfaction, and postnatal health","volume":"57","author":"A Shorten","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Midwifery Womens Health"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0031-1274508","article-title":"Mothers' satisfaction with planned vaginal and planned cesarean birth","volume":"28","author":"J L Blomquist","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Perinatology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/products\/ejournals\/pdf\/10.1055\/a-2126-7613.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,5]],"date-time":"2024-11-05T13:40:49Z","timestamp":1730814049000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/DOI\/DOI?10.1055\/a-2126-7613"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,11]]},"references-count":15,"journal-issue":{"issue":"S 01","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,13]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,5]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/a-2126-7613","archive":["Portico","CLOCKSS"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0735-1631","1098-8785"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0735-1631","type":"print"},{"value":"1098-8785","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,11]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,11]]}}}