{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T22:07:49Z","timestamp":1740175669799,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Georg Thieme Verlag KG","issue":"CP","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,22]],"date-time":"2024-04-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1713744000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100006069","name":"Krebsliga Beider Basel","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","award":["KLBB Nr. 22\/2010"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["KLBB Nr. 22\/2010"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100006069","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Ultrasound Int Open"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>\n          Background\u2002Radial breast ultrasound scanning (r-US) and commonly used\n                    meander-like ultrasound scanning (m-US) have recently been shown to be equally\n                    sensitive and specific with regard to the detection of breast malignancies. As\n                    patient satisfaction has a strong influence on patient compliance and thus on\n                    the quality of health care, we compare here the two US scanning techniques with\n                    regard to patient comfort during breast ultrasound (BUS) and analyze whether the\n                    patient has a preference for either scanning technique. <\/jats:p><jats:p>\n          Materials and Methods\u2002Symptomatic and asymptomatic women underwent both\n                    m-US and r-US scanning by two different examiners. Patient comfort and\n                    preference were assessed using a visual analog scale-based (VAS) questionnaire\n                    and were compared using a Mann-Whitney U test.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n          Results\u2002Analysis of 422 VAS-based questionnaires showed that perceived\n                    comfort with r-US (r-VAS 8 cm, IQR [5.3, 9.1]) was significantly higher compared\n                    to m-US (m-VAS 5.6 cm, IQR [5.2, 7.4]) (p &lt; 0.001). 53.8% of patients had no\n                    preference, 44.3% of patients clearly preferred r-US, whereas only 1.9% of\n                    patients preferred m-US. Conclusion: Patients experience a higher level of\n                    comfort with r-US and favor r-US over m-US. As the diagnostic accuracy of r-US\n                    has been shown to be comparable to that of m-US and the time required for\n                    examination is shorter, a switch from m-US to r-US in routine clinical practice\n                    might be beneficial. R-US offers considerable potential to positively affect\n                    patient compliance but also to save examination time and thus costs.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1055\/a-2282-9193","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,22]],"date-time":"2024-04-22T22:57:27Z","timestamp":1713826647000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"special_numbering":"S","title":["Patient perception of meander-like versus radial breast\n                    ultrasound"],"prefix":"10.1055","volume":"10","author":[{"given":"Pascale","family":"Brasier-Lutz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel,\n                    Basel, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Claudia","family":"J\u00e4ggi-Wickes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel,\n                    Basel, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sabine","family":"Sch\u00e4delin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Clinical Research, Statistics and Data Management,\n                    University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rosemarie","family":"Burian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel,\n                    Basel, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Cora-Ann","family":"Schoenenberger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Chemistry, University of Basel, 4056 Basel,\n                    Switzerland"},{"name":"Gynecology\/Gynecologic Oncology, Sankt Claraspital AG,\n                    Basel, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rosanna","family":"Zanetti-D\u00e4llenbach","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Gynecology\/Gynecologic Oncology, Sankt Claraspital AG,\n                    Basel, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"194","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"413","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.213.2.r99nv05413","article-title":"Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography","volume":"213","author":"H M Zonderland","year":"1999","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.166.2.3275983","article-title":"Palpable solid breast masses: retrospective single- and multimodality evaluation\n                    of 201 lesions","volume":"166","author":"P A van Dam","year":"1988","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2213010364","article-title":"Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with\n                    dense breast tissue","volume":"221","author":"S S Kaplan","year":"2001","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1169","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.12.8842","article-title":"Accuracy and value of breast ultrasound for primary imaging evaluation of\n                    symptomatic women 30-39 years of age","volume":"199","author":"C D Lehman","year":"2012","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.181.1.1810177","article-title":"Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts","volume":"181","author":"P Crystal","year":"2003","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1007\/bf01318980","article-title":"Strategies for enhancing patient compliance","volume":"6","author":"M H Becker","year":"1980","journal-title":"J Community Health"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"642","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.13121606","article-title":"Breast ultrasonography: state of the art","volume":"268","author":"R J Hooley","year":"2013","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1533","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05554-x","article-title":"Comparison of radial and meander-like breast ultrasound with respect to\n                    diagnostic accuracy and examination time","volume":"301","author":"C J\u00e4ggi-Wickes","year":"2020","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1055\/a-0838-9937","article-title":"The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of\n                    Elastography in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2018","volume":"40","author":"A S\u0103ftoiu","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultraschall Med"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.1055\/a-2020-9904","article-title":"Best Practice Guideline - DEGUM Recommendations on Breast\n                    Ultrasound","volume":"44","author":"C M Vogel-Minea","year":"2023","journal-title":"Ultraschall Med"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2023.05.007","article-title":"Emerging uses of artificial intelligence in breast and axillary ultrasound","volume":"100","author":"C Trepanier","year":"2023","journal-title":"Clin Imaging"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics13010058","article-title":"Artificial Intelligence in Breast Ultrasound: From Diagnosis to Prognosis\u2014A\n                    Rapid Review","volume":"13","author":"N Brunetti","year":"2023","journal-title":"Diagnostics"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10587","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph120910587","article-title":"Affects of Anxiety and Depression on Health-Related Quality of Life among\n                    Patients with Benign Breast Lumps Diagnosed via Ultrasonography in China","volume":"12","author":"Z Lou","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Environ Res Public Health"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/84.1.24","article-title":"Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family history\n                    of breast cancer","volume":"84","author":"K M Kash","year":"1992","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.38343.670868.D3","article-title":"Depression and anxiety in women with early breast cancer: five year\n                    observational cohort study","volume":"330","author":"C Burgess","year":"2005","journal-title":"Bmj"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2101","DOI":"10.1001\/archinte.160.14.2101","article-title":"Depression is a risk factor for noncompliance with medical treatment:\n                    meta-analysis of the effects of anxiety and depression on patient adherence","volume":"160","author":"M R DiMatteo","year":"2000","journal-title":"Arch Intern Med"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1440-1673.1997.tb00668.x","article-title":"Compression in mammography and the perception of discomfort","volume":"41","author":"A Poulos","year":"1997","journal-title":"Australas Radiol"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1023\/a:1006457520996","article-title":"Pain experienced by women attending breast cancer screening","volume":"60","author":"M E Keemers-Gels","year":"2000","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.2147\/ijwh.S129817","article-title":"Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in\n                    mammographic imaging","volume":"9","author":"C C Mendat","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int J Womens Health"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2013.03.003","article-title":"The effect of mammography pain on repeat participation in breast cancer\n                    screening: a systematic review","volume":"22","author":"P Whelehan","year":"2013","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"504","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0031-1273414","article-title":"[Automated breast ultrasound vs. handheld ultrasound: BI-RADS classification,\n                    duration of the examination and patient comfort]","volume":"32","author":"H Prosch","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultraschall Med"},{"key":"ref23","first-page":"128","volume-title":"Ultrasound. In: American College of Radiology R, VA, ed. ACR BI-RADS\u00ae Atlas,\n                    Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. 5th Edition edn.","author":"E B Mendelson","year":"2013"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"374","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2006-926943","article-title":"[BI-RADS-analogue DEGUM criteria for findings in breast ultrasound--consensus of\n                    the DEGUM Committee on Breast Ultrasound]","volume":"27","author":"H Madjar","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultraschall Med"},{"key":"ref25","first-page":"133","article-title":"Patient-centered Care","volume":"81","author":"A Reynolds","year":"2009","journal-title":"Radiol Technol"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.02.010","article-title":"Compliance with screening mammography and breast sonography of young Asian\n                    women","volume":"157","author":"H W Tsai","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.178.1.1984295","article-title":"Mammographic follow-up of low-suspicion lesions: compliance rate and diagnostic\n                    yield","volume":"178","author":"M A Helvie","year":"1991","journal-title":"Radiology"}],"container-title":["Ultrasound International Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/products\/ejournals\/pdf\/10.1055\/a-2282-9193.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,5]],"date-time":"2024-11-05T11:11:14Z","timestamp":1730805074000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/DOI\/DOI?10.1055\/a-2282-9193"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,22]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"CP","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,5]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024]]}},"alternative-id":["a22829193"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/a-2282-9193","archive":["Portico","CLOCKSS"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["2509-596X","2199-7152"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2509-596X"},{"type":"electronic","value":"2199-7152"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,22]]}}}