{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,2]],"date-time":"2025-06-02T07:50:50Z","timestamp":1748850650559,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Georg Thieme Verlag KG","issue":"15","funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000016","name":"U.S. Department of Health and Human Services","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","award":["HHSN275200800003IC; HHSN275200800014C; HHSN2752008"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["HHSN275200800003IC; HHSN275200800014C; HHSN2752008"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000016","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000002","name":"National Institutes of Health","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","award":["HHSN275200800013C; HHSN275200800002I; HHSN27500006"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["HHSN275200800013C; HHSN275200800002I; HHSN27500006"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000002","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]},{"name":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","award":["HHSN275200800028C; HHSN275201000009C"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["HHSN275200800028C; HHSN275201000009C"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Am J Perinatol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>\n            Objective\u2003Error in birthweight prediction by sonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) has clinical implications, such as avoidable cesarean or misclassification of fetal risk in labor. We aimed to evaluate optimal timing of ultrasound and which fetal measurements contribute to error in fetal ultrasound estimations of birth size at the extremes of birthweight.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n            Study Design\u2003We compared differences in head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), femur length, and EFW between ultrasound and corresponding birth measurements within 14 (n\u2009=\u20091,290) and 7 (n\u2009=\u2009617) days of birth for small- (SGA, &lt;10th percentile), appropriate- (AGA, 10th\u201390th), and large-for-gestational age (LGA, &gt;90th) newborns.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n            Results\u2003Average differences between EFW and birthweight for SGA neonates were: \u221240.2\u2009g (confidence interval [CI]: \u221282.1, 1.6) at 14 days versus 13.6\u2009g (CI: \u221252.4, 79.7) at 7 days; for AGA, \u2212122.4\u2009g (\u2212139.6, \u2212105.1) at 14 days versus \u221227.2\u2009g (\u221250.4, \u22124.0) at 7 days; and for LGA, \u2212242.8\u2009g (\u2212306.5, \u2212179.1) at 14 days versus \u221272.1\u2009g (\u2212152.0, 7.9) at 7 days. Differences between fetal and neonatal HC were larger at 14 versus 7 days, and similar to patterns for EFW and birthweight, differences were the largest for LGA at both intervals. In contrast, differences between fetal and neonatal AC were larger at 7 versus 14 days, suggesting larger error in AC estimation closer to birth.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n            Conclusion\u2003Using a standardized ultrasound protocol, SGA neonates had ultrasound measurements closer to actual birth measurements compared with AGA or LGA neonates. LGA neonates had the largest differences between fetal and neonatal size, with measurements 14 days from delivery showing 3- to 4-fold greater differences from birthweight. Differences in EFW and birthweight may not be explained by a single fetal measurement; whether estimation may be improved by incorporation of other knowable factors should be evaluated in future research.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n            Key Points\n          <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1055\/a-2298-5245","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,3]],"date-time":"2024-04-03T22:34:27Z","timestamp":1712183667000},"page":"2125-2134","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Comparing Fetal Ultrasound Biometric Measurements to Neonatal Anthropometry at the Extremes of Birth Weight"],"prefix":"10.1055","volume":"41","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9877-7931","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jessica L.","family":"Gleason","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Population Health Research, Division of Intramural Research, Epidemiology Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mary L.","family":"Hediger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Population Health Research, Division of Intramural Research, Epidemiology Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Zhen","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Population Health Research, Division of Intramural Research, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jagteshwar","family":"Grewal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Population Health Research, Division of Intramural Research, Office of the Director, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Roger","family":"Newman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"William A.","family":"Grobman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"John","family":"Owen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Katherine L.","family":"Grantz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Population Health Research, Division of Intramural Research, Epidemiology Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"194","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,10]]},"reference":[{"issue":"01","key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000296656.81143.e6","article-title":"Estimation of birth weight by two-dimensional ultrasonography: a critical appraisal of its accuracy","volume":"111","author":"M Scioscia","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref2","first-page":"815","article-title":"Assessment of the accuracy of multiple sonographic fetal weight estimation formulas: a 10-year experience from a single center","volume":"32","author":"O Barel","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"issue":"11","key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1461","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00702.x","article-title":"Accuracy of ultrasound biometry in the prediction of macrosomia: a systematic quantitative review","volume":"112","author":"A Coomarasamy","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-3016.2012.01261.x","article-title":"Predicting large fetuses at birth: do multiple ultrasound examinations and longitudinal statistical modelling improve prediction?","volume":"26","author":"J Zhang","year":"2012","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"issue":"11","key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1906","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1533945","article-title":"Comparing INTERGROWTH-21st century and Hadlock growth standards to predict small for gestational age and short-term neonatal outcomes","volume":"33","author":"C Nwabuobi","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"10","key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"915","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4161","article-title":"Performance of the ultrasound examination in the early and late third trimester for the prediction of birth weight deviations","volume":"33","author":"A P Souka","year":"2013","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"761","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20258","article-title":"Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates","volume":"53","author":"A Ciobanu","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"08","key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1337","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2017.1405385","article-title":"Third trimester ultrasound for fetal macrosomia: optimal timing and institutional specific accuracy","volume":"32","author":"L I Parikh","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7760","article-title":"Sonographic estimation of fetal head circumference: how accurate are we?","volume":"37","author":"N Melamed","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.08.032","article-title":"Racial\/ethnic standards for fetal growth: the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies","volume":"213","author":"G M Buck Louis","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/dyx161","article-title":"Cohort profile: NICHD fetal growth studies-singletons and twins","volume":"47","author":"J Grewal","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Epidemiol"},{"issue":"08","key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1725","DOI":"10.7863\/ultra.15.09087","article-title":"Ultrasound quality assurance for singletons in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development fetal growth studies","volume":"35","author":"M L Hediger","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4","article-title":"Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements\u2013a prospective study","volume":"151","author":"F P Hadlock","year":"1985","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1176","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)91348-3","article-title":"Anthropometric estimation of neonatal body composition","volume":"173","author":"P M Catalano","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"volume-title":"National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007\u20132008: Anthropometry Procedures Manual","year":"2008","author":"National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS)","key":"ref15"},{"issue":"07","key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1045","DOI":"10.1053\/jpsu.2001.24737","article-title":"The normal position of the umbilicus in the newborn: an aid to improving the cosmetic result in exomphalos major","volume":"36","author":"A M Williams","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Pediatr Surg"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7210754","article-title":"Neonatal anthropometric measurements to predict birth weight by ultrasound","volume":"22","author":"B P Stetzer","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"issue":"09","key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"781","DOI":"10.1016\/j.earlhumdev.2005.06.002","article-title":"Trunk anthropometry of Hong Kong Chinese infants","volume":"81","author":"T F Fok","year":"2005","journal-title":"Early Hum Dev"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2008.077","article-title":"Sex-specific charts for abdominal circumference in term and near-term Caucasian newborns","volume":"36","author":"G Rodr\u00edguez","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1017\/S0007114599001348","article-title":"Anthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status","volume":"82","author":"S J Ulijaszek","year":"1999","journal-title":"Br J Nutr"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref21","first-page":"497","article-title":"Intra- and interexaminer reliability of anthropometric measurements of term infants","volume":"24","author":"T S Johnson","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S27","DOI":"10.1177\/15648265040251S105","article-title":"Measurement and standardization protocols for anthropometry used in the construction of a new international growth reference","volume":"25","author":"M de Onis","year":"2004","journal-title":"Food Nutr Bull"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000345","article-title":"A revised birth weight reference for the United States","volume":"124","author":"E L Duryea","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref24","first-page":"523","article-title":"Macrosomia prediction using ultrasound fetal abdominal circumference of 35 centimeters or more","volume":"93","author":"A Jazayeri","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"170","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2012.01918.x","article-title":"Predicting neonatal weight of more than 4000\u2009g using fetal abdominal circumference measurement by ultrasound at 38-40 weeks of pregnancy: a study in Iran","volume":"39","author":"F Dadkhah","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"805","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-015-3720-3","article-title":"Intrapartum sonographic weight estimation","volume":"292","author":"F Faschingbauer","year":"2015","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmu.2015.02.004","article-title":"Accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation in Bangladesh","volume":"23","author":"S Q Rashid","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Med Ultrasound"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-963165","article-title":"Fetal weight estimation by ultrasound: comparison of 11 different formulae and examiners with differing skill levels","volume":"29","author":"J Siemer","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultraschall Med"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4037","article-title":"Sonographic estimation of fetal weight: comparison of bias, precision and consistency using 12 different formulae","volume":"30","author":"N G Anderson","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"617","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2009.28.5.617","article-title":"Sonographic fetal weight estimation: which model should be used?","volume":"28","author":"N Melamed","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2005.00311.x","article-title":"Ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight at term: an evaluation of eight formulae","volume":"31","author":"H M Mirghani","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"11","key":"ref32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1435","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13645","article-title":"Comparing the relation between ultrasound-estimated fetal weight and birthweight in cohort of small-for-gestational-age fetuses","volume":"98","author":"K Stephens","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"10","key":"ref33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1003190","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1003190","article-title":"Universal third-trimester ultrasonic screening using fetal macrosomia in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy","volume":"17","author":"A A Moraitis","year":"2020","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"340.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.12.043","article-title":"Overestimation of fetal weight by ultrasound: does it influence the likelihood of cesarean delivery for labor arrest?","volume":"200","author":"S C Blackwell","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.06.065","article-title":"Estimated fetal weight by ultrasound: a modifiable risk factor for cesarean delivery?","volume":"207","author":"S E Little","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2008.057","article-title":"Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population","volume":"36","author":"P A De Reu","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref37","first-page":"339","article-title":"Detecting fetal macrosomia with abdominal circumference alone","volume":"48","author":"C Henrichs","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.05.016","article-title":"Fetal growth velocity: the NICHD fetal growth studies","volume":"219","author":"K L Grantz","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2089","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00131-2","article-title":"Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the pregnancy outcome prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study","volume":"386","author":"U Sovio","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Perinatology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/products\/ejournals\/pdf\/10.1055\/a-2298-5245.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,5]],"date-time":"2024-11-05T13:35:01Z","timestamp":1730813701000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/DOI\/DOI?10.1055\/a-2298-5245"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,3]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"15","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,22]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,11]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/a-2298-5245","archive":["Portico","CLOCKSS"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0735-1631","1098-8785"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0735-1631"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1098-8785"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,3]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,3]]}}}