{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,9]],"date-time":"2025-05-09T23:10:05Z","timestamp":1746832205184,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Georg Thieme Verlag KG","issue":"03","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Neurol Surg B Skull Base"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>\n          Objectives\u2003While the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has become a well-established surgery for resection of craniopharyngiomas (CP), the utility of this procedure following subtotal resection from open transcranial approach (TCA) surgery has yet to be explored. Here we present a multi-institutional case series of patients who underwent EEA for treatment of recurrent CP originally treated by TCA, demonstrating the viability of this approach as salvage surgery.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n          Design\u2003Retrospective cohort.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n          Setting\u2003Loyola University Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n          Participants\u2003Patients who underwent EEA for recurrent CP following an initial TCA between 2003 and 2018.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n          Main Outcome Measures\u2003Gross total resection (GTR) rate, surgical complications, visual outcomes, and endocrine outcomes<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n          Results\u2003Patients who underwent EEA for recurrent CP following a prior TCA had a GTR rate of 77%. EEA reoperation was not associated with worsening of visual outcomes as compared with the primary TCA (0% visual worsening after EEA reoperation vs. 40% after primary TCA, p\u2009=\u20090.055). While primary TCA resulted in worsening endocrinopathies in 100% of patients (including seven patients with permanent diabetes insipidus), subsequent EEA for re-resection of CP resulted in stable (30.8%) or improved (69.2%) endocrine function in all patients (p\u2009&lt;\u20090.001).<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n          Conclusion\u2003EEA achieves reasonable GTR rates and is an effective, safe surgical option for recurrent CP postinitial TCA. This approach demonstrated stable or improved visual and endocrinologic outcomes in all patients within our two-institution series. Thus, EEA should be considered as an efficacious form of retreatment in cases of progressive and recurrent CP.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1055\/a-2301-3867","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,8]],"date-time":"2024-04-08T23:09:32Z","timestamp":1712617772000},"page":"295-302","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Residual and Recurrent Craniopharyngioma after Transcranial Approach: A Multi-institutional Experience"],"prefix":"10.1055","volume":"86","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5687-6488","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ronak H.","family":"Jani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurological Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sudesh","family":"Raju","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Miri","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurological Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Paul","family":"Gardner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Georgios A.","family":"Zenonos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8920-4522","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Carl","family":"Snyderman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Eric W.","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Chirag","family":"Patel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Otolaryngology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anand V.","family":"Germanwala","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurological Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"194","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,3]]},"reference":[{"issue":"02","key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"329","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2011.07.011","article-title":"Endoscopic endonasal compared with microscopic transsphenoidal and open transcranial resection of craniopharyngiomas","volume":"77","author":"R J Komotar","year":"2012","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e841","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2019.07.225","article-title":"Preservation of hypothalamic function with endoscopic endonasal resection of hypothalamus-invaded craniopharyngiomas","volume":"132","author":"L Yang","year":"2019","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"715","DOI":"10.3171\/JNS\/2008\/108\/4\/0715","article-title":"Expanded endonasal approach, a fully endoscopic transnasal approach for the resection of midline suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a new classification based on the infundibulum","volume":"108","author":"A B Kassam","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1194","DOI":"10.3171\/2013.6.JNS122259","article-title":"Endoscopic endonasal surgery for craniopharyngiomas: surgical outcome in 64 patients","volume":"119","author":"M Koutourousiou","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.3171\/2009.2.JNS081026","article-title":"Extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for residual or recurrent craniopharyngiomas","volume":"111","author":"L M Cavallo","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"issue":"S 03","key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S241","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0038-1623522","article-title":"Endoscopic endonasal approach for a suprasellar craniopharyngioma","volume":"79","author":"G A Zenonos","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Neurol Surg B Skull Base"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"418","DOI":"10.3171\/2016.1.JNS152238","article-title":"Endonasal endoscopic reoperation for residual or recurrent craniopharyngiomas","volume":"126","author":"S Dhandapani","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clineuro.2018.02.002","article-title":"Extended endoscopic endonasal approach for recurrent or residual symptomatic craniopharyngiomas","volume":"168","author":"B Tang","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Neurol Neurosurg"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref9","first-page":"13","article-title":"Endoscopic endonasal anterior extended transsphenoidal approach in craniopharyngioma surgery","volume":"77","author":"P L Kalinin","year":"2013","journal-title":"Vopr Neirokhir"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3171\/2019.4.PEDS18612","article-title":"Endoscopic endonasal resection versus open surgery for pediatric craniopharyngioma: comparison of outcomes and complications","volume":"24","author":"P J Madsen","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Pediatr"},{"issue":"10","key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1917","DOI":"10.1007\/s00701-014-2150-5","article-title":"Extended endoscopic endonasal approach for recurrent or residual adult craniopharyngiomas","volume":"156","author":"S K Kim","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Neurochir (Wien)"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"290","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surneu.2007.11.014","article-title":"Extended transsphenoidal surgery for suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: infrachiasmatic radical resection combined with or without a suprachiasmatic trans-lamina terminalis approach","volume":"71","author":"M Kitano","year":"2009","journal-title":"Surg Neurol"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.3.JNS131521","article-title":"The endoscopic endonasal approach for the management of craniopharyngiomas: a series of 103 patients","volume":"121","author":"L M Cavallo","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E6","DOI":"10.3171\/2016.9.FOCUS16314","article-title":"Outcomes in transcranial microsurgery versus extended endoscopic endonasal approach for primary resection of adult craniopharyngiomas","volume":"41","author":"T J Wannemuehler","year":"2016","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e447","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2020.08.184","article-title":"Endoscopic endonasal approach for craniopharyngiomas with intraventricular extension: case series, long-term outcomes, and review","volume":"144","author":"H Algattas","year":"2020","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e98","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2023.11.053","article-title":"Evaluation of retrospective patient preference on extent of resection of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas","volume":"182","author":"F Behzadi","year":"2024","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1058329","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2022.1058329","article-title":"Craniopharyngioma resection by endoscopic endonasal approach versus transcranial approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies","volume":"12","author":"M K Na","year":"2022","journal-title":"Front Oncol"},{"issue":"17","key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2910","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.32197","article-title":"Targeted treatment of papillary craniopharyngiomas harboring BRAF V600E mutations","volume":"125","author":"T A Juratli","year":"2019","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"djv310","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djv310","article-title":"Dramatic response of BRAF V600E mutant papillary craniopharyngioma to targeted therapy","volume":"108","author":"P K Brastianos","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.2217\/cns-2016-0034","article-title":"BRAF-V600E mutant papillary craniopharyngioma dramatically responds to combination BRAF and MEK inhibitors","volume":"6","author":"A Roque","year":"2017","journal-title":"CNS Oncol"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1038\/s41572-019-0125-9","article-title":"Craniopharyngioma","volume":"5","author":"H L M\u00fcller","year":"2019","journal-title":"Nat Rev Dis Primers"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa2213329","article-title":"BRAF-MEK inhibition in newly diagnosed papillary craniopharyngiomas","volume":"389","author":"P K Brastianos","year":"2023","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1016\/S0360-3016(99)00030-9","article-title":"The role of radiation therapy in the management of craniopharyngioma: a 25-year experience and review of the literature","volume":"44","author":"J L Habrand","year":"1999","journal-title":"Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1007\/s11060-012-0806-7","article-title":"The superiority of conservative resection and adjuvant radiation for craniopharyngiomas","volume":"108","author":"A Schoenfeld","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Neurooncol"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1093\/neuonc\/3.3.159","article-title":"Stereotactic radiosurgery of residual or recurrent craniopharyngioma, after surgery, with or without radiation therapy","volume":"3","author":"S M Chiou","year":"2001","journal-title":"Neuro-oncol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/products\/ejournals\/pdf\/10.1055\/a-2301-3867.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,9]],"date-time":"2025-05-09T22:38:42Z","timestamp":1746830322000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/DOI\/DOI?10.1055\/a-2301-3867"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,8]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"03","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,9]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,6]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/a-2301-3867","archive":["Portico","CLOCKSS"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["2193-6331","2193-634X"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2193-6331"},{"type":"electronic","value":"2193-634X"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,8]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,8]]}}}