{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,1]],"date-time":"2026-04-01T09:10:44Z","timestamp":1775034644029,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Georg Thieme Verlag KG","issue":"14","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Knee Surg"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>The impact of cementless trabecular metal (TM) implants on implant survivorship are not well delineated. This study compares primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) revision rates of cemented knee replacements with two cementless knee replacement designs\u2014cementless TM and a non-TM cementless design. Data from a national registry queried TKA procedures performed for osteoarthritis from 1999 to 2020. The risk of revision of Zimmer NexGen TKA using cementless TM, cementless non-TM, and cemented non-TM were compared. Analyses included Kaplan\u2013Meier estimates of survivorship and Cox hazard ratios (HR), stratified by age and gender. Cementless TM components had higher risks of revision compared with cementless non-TM implants (HR\u2009=\u20091.49; p \u2264 0.001). Cementless TM implants showed higher risks of revision compared with cemented non-TM prostheses for the first 2 years (HR\u2009=\u20091.75, p\u2009&lt;\u20090.001). Non-TM prostheses posed equal risk of revision for cementless and cemented fixations (HR\u2009=\u20090.95, p\u2009=\u20090.522). Patients aged 55 to 64 years and 65 to 74 years had a higher risk of revision for cementless TM compared with cementless non-TM (HR\u2009=\u20091.40, p\u2009=\u20090.033 and HR\u2009=\u20091.79, p\u2009&lt;\u20090.001, respectively) and cemented non-TM implants (HR\u2009=\u20091.51, p\u2009&lt;\u20090.001 and HR\u2009=\u20091.54, p\u2009&lt;\u20090.001, respectively). The study shows there is an increased risk of revision with TM cementless implants for patients aged 55 to 74 years. These results do not support the use of TM tibial implants for patients of this age group for primary TKA.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1055\/a-2376-6889","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,31]],"date-time":"2024-07-31T23:22:00Z","timestamp":1722468120000},"page":"949-958","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Survivorship of Primary NexGen Knee Replacement: Comparing Cementless Trabecular Metal to Other Designs of Tibial Component"],"prefix":"10.1055","volume":"37","author":[{"given":"Ayooluwa S.","family":"Ayoola","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western Michigan School of Medicine Homer Stryker M.D., Kalamazoo, Michigan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Michael A.","family":"Charters","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0000-1189-348X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Hamza M.","family":"Raja","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6137-5813","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Luke","family":"Weseman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Peter L.","family":"Lewis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), Adelaide, South Australia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yi","family":"Peng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, South Australia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Wayne Trevor","family":"North","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"194","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2007.02.006","article-title":"Evolution of tibial fixation in total knee arthroplasty","volume":"22","author":"A V Lombardi Jr","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"08","key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2598","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2017.02.069","article-title":"Total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis in patients less than fifty-five years of age: a systematic review","volume":"32","author":"R S Aujla","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-019-1293-8","article-title":"Cementless versus cemented total knee arthroplasty in young patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"14","author":"C Chen","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"issue":"08","key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2012.02.022","article-title":"Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States","volume":"27","author":"S M Kurtz","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"388","key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-200107000-00010","article-title":"Long-term followup of the Miller-Galante total knee replacement","author":"R A Berger","year":"2001","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"issue":"404","key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-200211000-00007","article-title":"Long-term followup of nonmodular total knee replacements","author":"E M Keating","year":"2002","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"issue":"07","key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.21037\/atm.2016.01.34","article-title":"Cementless total knee arthroplasty","volume":"4","author":"A Aprato","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann Transl Med"},{"issue":"07","key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"889","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.91B7.21702","article-title":"Survival and clinical function of cemented and cementless prostheses in total knee replacement","volume":"91-B","author":"R Gandhi","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"312","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2018.04.015","article-title":"No difference in implant survivorship and clinical outcomes between full-cementless and full-cemented fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"53","author":"K Zhou","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"793","DOI":"10.1302\/2058-5241.5.200030","article-title":"Cemented vs. cementless fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"5","author":"A K Prasad","year":"2020","journal-title":"EFORT Open Rev"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1016\/0267-6605(94)90113-9","article-title":"Biological performance of tantalum","volume":"16","author":"J Black","year":"1994","journal-title":"Clin Mater"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S183","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2019.02.024","article-title":"To cement or not? Five-year results of a prospective, randomized study comparing cemented vs cementless total knee arthroplasty","volume":"34","author":"K B Fricka","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"ref14","volume-title":"Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR)","year":"2020"},{"issue":"08","key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1390","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2011.06.030","article-title":"Prospective results of uncemented tantalum monoblock tibia in total knee arthroplasty: minimum 5-year follow-up in patients younger than 55 years","volume":"26","author":"A F Kamath","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"S 02","key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200412002-00017","article-title":"Clinical validation of a structural porous tantalum biomaterial for adult reconstruction","volume":"86-A","author":"J D Bobyn","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1142\/S0218957799000269","article-title":"Interfacial frictional behavior: cancellous bone, cortical bone, and a novel porous tantalum biomaterial","volume":"03","author":"Y Zhang","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Musculoskelet Res"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"666","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.09.011","article-title":"Cementless porous tantalum monoblock tibia vs cemented modular tibia in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis","volume":"32","author":"B Hu","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref19","first-page":"216","article-title":"A porous tantalum trabecular metal: basic science","volume":"31","author":"R Cohen","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Orthop"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"380","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20130426-10","article-title":"Comparison of cemented and uncemented fixation in total knee arthroplasty","volume":"36","author":"T E Brown","year":"2013","journal-title":"Orthopedics"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-021-02299-4","article-title":"A comprehensive comparison between cementless and cemented fixation in the total knee arthroplasty: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"16","author":"Y Liu","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"issue":"13","key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1185","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.18.01162","article-title":"Cemented versus cementless total knee arthroplasty of the same modern design: a prospective, randomized trial","volume":"101","author":"D Nam","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"941","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2008.06.018","article-title":"Preliminary results of an uncemented trabecular metal tibial component in total knee arthroplasty","volume":"24","author":"A T Helm","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"398","DOI":"10.3109\/17453674.2013.799418","article-title":"Trabecular metal tibia still stable at 5 years: an RSA study of 36 patients aged less than 60 years","volume":"84","author":"A Henricson","year":"2013","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"504","DOI":"10.1080\/17453674.2016.1205169","article-title":"Trabecular metal tibial knee component still stable at 10 years","volume":"87","author":"A Henricson","year":"2016","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"issue":"08","key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1025","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.102B8.BJJ-2019-1448.R1","article-title":"Uncemented tantalum metal components versus cemented tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: 11- to 15-year outcomes of a single-blinded randomized controlled trial","volume":"102-B","author":"M Hampton","year":"2020","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"11","key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5798","DOI":"10.1021\/acsbiomaterials.9b00493","article-title":"Porous tantalum and titanium in orthopedics: a review","volume":"5","author":"Q Han","year":"2019","journal-title":"ACS Biomater Sci Eng"},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1424","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(17)30059-4","article-title":"The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study","volume":"389","author":"L E Bayliss","year":"2017","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1545","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2020.01.056","article-title":"Gender differences in contribution of smoking, low physical activity, and high BMI to increased risk of early reoperation after TKA","volume":"35","author":"J Gallo","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"08","key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2700","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-015-4220-2","article-title":"What host factors affect aseptic loosening after THA and TKA?","volume":"473","author":"J J Cherian","year":"2015","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"}],"container-title":["The Journal of Knee Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/products\/ejournals\/pdf\/10.1055\/a-2376-6889.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,5]],"date-time":"2024-11-05T14:53:14Z","timestamp":1730818394000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/DOI\/DOI?10.1055\/a-2376-6889"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,31]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"14","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,28]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/a-2376-6889","archive":["Portico","CLOCKSS"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1538-8506","1938-2480"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1538-8506","type":"print"},{"value":"1938-2480","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,31]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,31]]}}}