{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,9]],"date-time":"2026-01-09T03:45:19Z","timestamp":1767930319261,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":47,"publisher":"Georg Thieme Verlag KG","issue":"01","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Knee Surg"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Novel implant systems have design modifications that seek to improve total knee arthroplasty (TKA) survivorship. We evaluated overall and cause-specific revision risk for a newer generation implant system compared with its predecessor from the same manufacturer. We conducted a cohort study using data from the United States-based Kaiser Permanente Total Joint Replacement Registry. Adult patients who underwent primary, fully cemented, fixed-bearing TKA for osteoarthritis between 2009 and 2022 were identified. Only two implant systems from the manufacturer were included: the newer generation (n\u2009=\u200922,287) and the older generation (n\u2009=\u200937,105). Multivariable Cox regression was used to evaluate overall and cause-specific aseptic revision risk. In the adjusted analyses, no difference in risk was observed for the newer compared with older generation system in the first 4-year follow-up (hazard ratio [HR]\u2009=\u20090.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]\u2009=\u20090.74\u20131.19); however, a higher risk was observed after 4-year follow-up (HR\u2009=\u20092.09, 95% CI\u2009=\u20091.41\u20133.08). This higher risk was due to loosening (within 4 years: HR\u2009=\u20090.90, 95% CI\u2009=\u20090.59\u20131.37; after 4 years: HR\u2009=\u20092.88, 95% CI\u2009=\u20091.84\u20134.51); no differences were observed for other revision reasons. When considering constructs utilizing different trays of the newer generation system, the higher risk of revision for loosening was observed only when the first iteration of the tray was used (HR\u2009=\u20091.94, 95% CI\u2009=\u20091.37\u20132.77); no difference was observed for constructs utilizing the subsequent iterations of the tray, which underwent design changes, when compared with the older generation TKA system (HR\u2009=\u20090.45, 95% CI\u2009=\u20090.20\u20131.01). We found no survivorship advantage with a newer TKA design compared with a preceding design from the same manufacturer. The higher risk of revision for loosening in the newer generation constructs was limited to those utilizing the first tray iteration, which is now discontinued by the manufacturer. The higher revision risk was not observed with subsequent iterations of the newer generation construct relative to the older generation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>Level of Evidence\u2003Level III.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1055\/a-2664-7627","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]],"date-time":"2025-07-24T23:40:14Z","timestamp":1753400414000},"page":"026-035","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Newer versus Older Implant Systems from a Single Manufacturer and Cause-Specific Revision Risk following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty"],"prefix":"10.1055","volume":"39","author":[{"given":"Matthew P.","family":"Kelly","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Harbor City, California"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2200-6564","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Heather A.","family":"Prentice","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Medical Device Surveillance and Assessment, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, California"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Brian H.","family":"Fasig","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Medical Device Surveillance and Assessment, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, California"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dhiren S.","family":"Sheth","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Irvine, California"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nithin C.","family":"Reddy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, San Diego, California"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Monti","family":"Khatod","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, California"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Elizabeth W.","family":"Paxton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Medical Device Surveillance and Assessment, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, California"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"194","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,7]]},"reference":[{"issue":"01","key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-009-1119-9","article-title":"Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?","volume":"468","author":"R B Bourne","year":"2010","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1156","DOI":"10.1097\/CORR.0000000000001229","article-title":"Does knee prosthesis survivorship improve when implant designs change? Findings from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry","volume":"478","author":"P L Lewis","year":"2020","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.1016\/j.knee.2006.06.003","article-title":"Five-year results of the Sigma total knee arthroplasty","volume":"13","author":"R A Clayton","year":"2006","journal-title":"Knee"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.07.021","article-title":"Clinical and radiographic results of Attune and PFC Sigma knee designs at 2-year follow-up: a prospective matched-pair analysis","volume":"32","author":"C S Ranawat","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"09","key":"ref5","first-page":"S68","article-title":"Patellar crepitation in the PFC sigma total knee system","volume":"29","author":"A S Ranawat","year":"2006","journal-title":"Orthopedics"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.91B4.21494","article-title":"The incidence of the patellar clunk syndrome in a recently designed mobile-bearing posteriorly stabilised total knee replacement","volume":"91","author":"K Fukunaga","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1166","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2011.12.009","article-title":"Effect of femoral component design on patellofemoral crepitance and patella clunk syndrome after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty","volume":"27","author":"B M Frye","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1512","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-012-2652-5","article-title":"Painful patellar clunk or crepitation of contemporary knee prostheses","volume":"471","author":"W C Choi","year":"2013","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amsu.2017.03.032","article-title":"Case series report of navigation-based in vivo knee kinematics in total knee arthroplasty with a gradually reducing femoral radius design","volume":"17","author":"H Takagi","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ann Med Surg (Lond)"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.7812\/TPP\/22.172","article-title":"Comparing Kaiser Permanente members to the general population: implications for generalizability of research","volume":"27","author":"A C Davis","year":"2023","journal-title":"Perm J"},{"issue":"10","key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2646","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-010-1463-9","article-title":"Kaiser Permanente National Total Joint Replacement Registry: aligning operations with information technology","volume":"468","author":"E W Paxton","year":"2010","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"issue":"S 02","key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.J.00807","article-title":"A prospective study of 80,000 total joint and 5000 anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in a community-based registry in the United States","volume":"92","author":"E W Paxton","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref14","first-page":"246","article-title":"Kaiser Permanente implant registries benefit patient safety, quality improvement, cost-effectiveness","volume":"39","author":"E W Paxton","year":"2013","journal-title":"Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.1080\/17453674.2020.1853340","article-title":"Variation and trends in reasons for knee replacement revision: a multi-registry study of revision burden","volume":"92","author":"P L Lewis","year":"2021","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"610","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.105B6.BJJ-2022-0675.R1","article-title":"High rate of radiolucent lines following the cemented original design of the Attune total knee arthroplasty","volume":"105-B","author":"A D Prodromidis","year":"2023","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"08","key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1329","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2013.01.012","article-title":"Revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty: a complication-based analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers","volume":"28","author":"P Sadoghi","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"09","key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1774","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2013.07.024","article-title":"Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today\u2013has anything changed after 10 years?","volume":"29","author":"P F Sharkey","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"09","key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"715","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.M.01534","article-title":"Current failure mechanisms after knee arthroplasty have changed: polyethylene wear is less common in revision surgery","volume":"97","author":"K Thiele","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"12","key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2181","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2015.06.057","article-title":"Increased aseptic tibial failures in patients with a BMI \u226535 and well-aligned total knee arthroplasties","volume":"30","author":"M P Abdel","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0037-1603756","article-title":"Unusually high rate of early failure of tibial component in Attune total knee arthroplasty system at implant-cement interface","volume":"30","author":"P M Bonutti","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Knee Surg"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.103B6.BJJ-2020-1956.R1","article-title":"Unexpected high rate of revision of a modern cemented fixed bearing modular posterior-stabilized knee arthroplasty","volume":"103-B","author":"P F Lachiewicz","year":"2021","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"12","key":"ref23","first-page":"e20582","article-title":"Early aseptic failure of the tibial component-cement interface in ATTUNE total knee arthroplasty: a report of three cases","volume":"13","author":"J D Murphy","year":"2021","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"ref24","first-page":"98","article-title":"Early experience with the ATTUNE total knee replacement system","volume":"90","author":"S Giaretta","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Biomed"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artd.2022.06.012","article-title":"Tibial baseplate-cement interface debonding in the ATTUNE total knee arthroplasty system","volume":"17","author":"D Torino","year":"2022","journal-title":"Arthroplast Today"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.52628\/88.1.13","article-title":"Early aseptic loosening of the tibial component at the cement-implant interface in total knee arthroplasty: a narrative overview of potentially associated factors","volume":"88","author":"T JM van Otten","year":"2022","journal-title":"Acta Orthop Belg"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artd.2017.10.005","article-title":"Proximal tibial resorption in a modern total knee prosthesis","volume":"4","author":"J T Deen","year":"2017","journal-title":"Arthroplast Today"},{"issue":"12","key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1791","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.103B.BJJ-2020-2555.R2","article-title":"Tibial tray debonding from the cement mantle is associated with deformation of the backside of polyethylene tibial inserts","volume":"103-B","author":"R M Bhalekar","year":"2021","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jajs.2021.03.007","article-title":"Attune total knee arthroplasty: is there evidence of early tibial component de-bonding? A prospective cohort study with a minimum two year follow-up","volume":"8","author":"T Robinson","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Arthrosc Jt Surg"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artd.2016.05.002","article-title":"Posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair analysis of a classic and its evolutional design","volume":"2","author":"P F Indelli","year":"2016","journal-title":"Arthroplast Today"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"509","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-022-03397-7","article-title":"Early and mid-term results with the ATTUNE total knee replacement system compared to PFC Sigma: a prospective comparative study","volume":"17","author":"R E Willburger","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1148","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-018-5130-0","article-title":"Modern cemented total knee arthroplasty design shows a higher incidence of radiolucent lines compared to its predecessor","volume":"27","author":"K Staats","year":"2019","journal-title":"Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"614","DOI":"10.3109\/17453674.2012.747052","article-title":"Early migration of tibial components is associated with late revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21,000 knee arthroplasties","volume":"83","author":"B G Pijls","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"issue":"12","key":"ref34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1579","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.100B12.BJJ-2018-0566.R1","article-title":"The assessment of the stability of the tibial component of a novel knee arthroplasty system using radiostereometric analysis","volume":"100-B","author":"T R Turgeon","year":"2018","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"11","key":"ref35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1168","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.105B11.BJJ-2022-0839.R4","article-title":"No difference in component migration at five years between the cemented cruciate-retaining ATTUNE and PFC-Sigma knee prosthesis: an update of a randomized clinical radiostereometry trial","volume":"105-B","author":"Y Y\u00fcksel","year":"2023","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"09","key":"ref36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1158","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.102B9.BJJ-2020-0096.R1","article-title":"A randomized controlled trial comparing tibial migration of the ATTUNE cemented cruciate-retaining knee prosthesis with the PFC-sigma design","volume":"102-B","author":"B L Kaptein","year":"2020","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1302\/2046-3758.83.BJJ-2018-0102.R2","article-title":"Analysis of the Attune tibial tray backside: a comparative retrieval study","volume":"8","author":"A Cerquiglini","year":"2019","journal-title":"Bone Joint Res"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"356","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2020.07.049","article-title":"A biomechanical comparison of the effect of baseplate design and bone marrow fat infiltration on tibial baseplate pullout strength","volume":"36","author":"B C Kelly","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"ref40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1016\/j.knee.2021.09.010","article-title":"Cement debonding behaviors of the various tibial components of the ATTUNE knee system and its predecessors: is a cement-in-cement revision an alternative?","volume":"33","author":"S Jaeger","year":"2021","journal-title":"Knee"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2017.09.056","article-title":"Comparison of clinical results and injury risk of posterior tibial cortex between Attune and press fit condylar sigma knee systems","volume":"33","author":"S J Song","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-018-0757-6","article-title":"A comparison of clinical- and patient-reported outcomes of the cemented ATTUNE and PFC sigma fixed bearing cruciate sacrificing knee systems in patients who underwent total knee replacement with both prostheses in opposite knees","volume":"13","author":"B W Carey","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1310","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.11.025","article-title":"Femoral implant design modification decreases the incidence of patellar crepitus in total knee arthroplasty","volume":"32","author":"J R Martin","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"ref44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S187","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2017.04.014","article-title":"Comparative incidence of patellofemoral complications between 2 total knee arthroplasty systems in a multicenter, prospective clinical study","volume":"32","author":"S D Toomey","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"474","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-022-05446-y","article-title":"Comparative retrieval analysis of a novel anatomic tibial tray backside: alterations in tibial component design and surface coating can increase cement adhesions and surface roughness","volume":"23","author":"D T Mathis","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"424","DOI":"10.1016\/j.knee.2015.02.016","article-title":"Case series report: early cement-implant interface fixation failure in total knee replacement","volume":"22","author":"K J Hazelwood","year":"2015","journal-title":"Knee"},{"issue":"10","key":"ref47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2025","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2022.04.043","article-title":"No difference in revision rate between low viscosity and high viscosity cement used in primary total knee arthroplasty","volume":"37","author":"A Klasan","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"11","key":"ref48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2579","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.03.063","article-title":"Failure at the tibial cement-implant interface with the use of high-viscosity cement in total knee arthroplasty","volume":"31","author":"J E Kopinski","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1987","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2021.01.052","article-title":"The association between cement viscosity and revision risk after primary total knee arthroplasty","volume":"36","author":"R WB Wyatt","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"}],"container-title":["The Journal of Knee Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/products\/ejournals\/pdf\/10.1055\/a-2664-7627.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,8]],"date-time":"2026-01-08T23:47:48Z","timestamp":1767916068000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/DOI\/DOI?10.1055\/a-2664-7627"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]]},"references-count":47,"journal-issue":{"issue":"01","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,8]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/a-2664-7627","archive":["Portico","CLOCKSS"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1538-8506","1938-2480"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1538-8506","type":"print"},{"value":"1938-2480","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,24]]}}}