{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,12]],"date-time":"2026-05-12T00:07:35Z","timestamp":1778544455199,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":43,"publisher":"Georg Thieme Verlag KG","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Am J Perinatol"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)\/Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Safe Prevention of Primary Cesarean Delivery guidelines provide minimum time criteria at which cesarean delivery (CD) should be performed for a labor arrest disorder. We evaluated factors associated with nonadherence to these guidelines.<\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>This is a retrospective case\u2013control study of CDs with an indication of labor arrest disorders at a single center from June 2018 to September 2021. Charts were reviewed for adherence to minimum criteria for failed induction of labor (IOL), arrest of dilation, and arrest of descent. Cases and controls were patients who underwent CD prior to (i.e., nonadherent) or after (i.e., adherent) meeting minimum criteria, respectively. Maternal, fetal, and system-level factors were compared.<\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>Of 308 primary CDs with an indication of a labor arrest disorder, 54% met minimum ACOG criteria and 46% did not. Nonadherence was less likely for provider groups with 24-hour in-house coverage (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19\u20130.76) and in the setting of maternal obesity (aOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.27\u20130.89). Nonadherence was more likely when Category II tracing was present (aOR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.04\u20133.46). Nonadherence differed by type of labor arrest. Nonadherence was less likely in cases of failed IOL (aOR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.25\u20130.66) and was more likely in cases of arrest of descent (aOR: 4.08, 95% CI: 2.35\u20137.07).<\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>Multiple factors influence adherence to the ACOG guidelines for labor arrest disorders. Addressing modifiable factors may improve adherence and decrease CD rates.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1055\/a-2864-0651","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,30]],"date-time":"2026-04-30T05:23:38Z","timestamp":1777526618000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Factors Associated with Nonadherence to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Guidelines for Labor Arrest Disorders"],"prefix":"10.1055","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0002-7846-2953","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Katherine V.","family":"Carbonell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, United States","department":["Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lucy","family":"Simpson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Mercy Hospital St Louis Area, United States","department":["Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Shannon","family":"Beermann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, United States","department":["Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0790-5606","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rachel","family":"Paul","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, United States","department":["Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6491-6910","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Antonina","family":"Frolova","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, United States","department":["Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jeannie C.","family":"Kelly","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, United States","department":["Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nandini","family":"Raghuraman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, United States","department":["Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Bree","family":"Goodman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, United States","department":["Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"194","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,11]]},"reference":[{"issue":"03","key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026","article-title":"Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery","volume":"210","author":"A B Caughey","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.007","article-title":"Maternal death in the 21st century: causes, prevention, and relationship to cesarean delivery","volume":"199","author":"S L Clark","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"ref3","first-page":"623","article-title":"Using electronic health record and administrative data to analyze maternal and neonatal delivery complications","volume":"46","author":"K Huennekens","year":"2020","journal-title":"Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"370","DOI":"10.3109\/01443611003628411","article-title":"Changing trends in operative delivery performed at full dilatation over a 10-year period","volume":"30","author":"J A Loudon","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1395","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12669","article-title":"Indications for caesarean sections at \u226534 weeks among nulliparous women and differential composite maternal and neonatal morbidity","volume":"121","author":"S P Chauhan","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182952242","article-title":"Primary cesarean delivery in the United States","volume":"122","author":"A Boyle","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1226","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000219750.79480.84","article-title":"Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries","volume":"107","author":"R M Silver","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.09.028","article-title":"Long-term maternal morbidity associated with repeat cesarean delivery","volume":"205","author":"E A Clark","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-004-0692-0","article-title":"Association between method of delivery, puerperal complication rate and postpartum hysterectomy","volume":"272","author":"E Simoes","year":"2005","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"11","key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1341","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2011.553695","article-title":"The effect of cesarean delivery rates on the future incidence of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and maternal mortality","volume":"24","author":"K N Solheim","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1891\/1058-1243.23.1.17","article-title":"Major survey findings of listening to mothers (SM) III: new mothers speak out: report of national surveys of women's childbearing experiences. Conducted October-December 2012 and January-April 2013","volume":"23","author":"E R Declercq","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Perinat Educ"},{"issue":"09","key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0222998","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0222998","article-title":"Correlates of prenatal and postnatal mother-to-infant bonding quality: a systematic review","volume":"14","author":"E Tichelman","year":"2019","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1113","DOI":"10.3945\/ajcn.111.030254","article-title":"Breastfeeding after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of world literature","volume":"95","author":"E Prior","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Clin Nutr"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1002494","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002494","article-title":"Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"15","author":"O E Keag","year":"2018","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1136\/gutjnl-2012-303249","article-title":"Decreased gut microbiota diversity, delayed Bacteroidetes colonisation and reduced Th1 responses in infants delivered by caesarean section","volume":"63","author":"H E Jakobsson","year":"2014","journal-title":"Gut"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1349","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)31930-5","article-title":"Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children","volume":"392","author":"J Sandall","year":"2018","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e005671","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjgh-2021-005671","article-title":"Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates","volume":"6","author":"A P Betran","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ Glob Health"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref18","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2021","volume":"72","author":"M JK Osterman","year":"2023","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65","article-title":"Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate","volume":"118","author":"E L Barber","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1281","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181fdef6e","article-title":"Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes","volume":"116","author":"J Zhang","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1568","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(54)90311-7","article-title":"The graphic analysis of labor","volume":"68","author":"E Friedman","year":"1954","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"09","key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0239724","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0239724","article-title":"First stage progression in women with spontaneous onset of labor: a large population-based cohort study","volume":"15","author":"L Lundborg","year":"2020","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref23","first-page":"323","article-title":"Active-phase labor arrest: oxytocin augmentation for at least 4","volume":"93","author":"D J Rouse","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref24","first-page":"550","article-title":"Active phase labor arrest: revisiting the 2-hour minimum","volume":"98","author":"D J Rouse","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.15620\/cdc:104993","volume-title":"Births: provisional data for 2020. Vital statistics rapid release; no. 012","author":"B E Hamilton","year":"2021"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2020-0343","article-title":"Non-adherence to labor guidelines in cesarean sections done for failed induction and arrest of dilation","volume":"49","author":"C M Escobar","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbi.2008.08.010","article-title":"Research electronic data capture (REDCap)\u2013a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support","volume":"42","author":"P A Harris","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Biomed Inform"},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103208","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbi.2019.103208","article-title":"The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners","volume":"95","author":"P A Harris","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Biomed Inform"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e88","DOI":"10.1542\/neo.22-2-e88","article-title":"Fetal heart rate tracing category II: a broad category in need of stratification","volume":"22","year":"2021","journal-title":"Neoreviews"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000005447","article-title":"First and second stage labor management: ACOG clinical practice guideline no. 8","volume":"143","author":"First and Second Stage Labor Management","year":"2024","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"499","DOI":"10.5468\/ogs.2017.60.6.499","article-title":"Vacuum extraction vaginal delivery: current trend and safety","volume":"60","author":"J Jeon","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Sci"},{"issue":"18","key":"ref33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1886","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.904282","article-title":"Temporal trends and morbidities of vacuum, forceps, and combined use of both","volume":"27","author":"A Fong","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1271213","article-title":"Effect of fear of litigation on obstetric care: a nationwide analysis on obstetric practice","volume":"28","author":"P Zwecker","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7211734","article-title":"Vacuum and forceps training in residency: experience and self-reported competency","volume":"27","author":"J Powell","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"ref36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"489267","DOI":"10.1155\/2015\/489267","article-title":"Forceps, actual use, and potential cesarean section prevention: study in a selected Mexican population","volume":"2015","author":"R Ayala-Y\u00e1\u00f1ez","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Pregnancy"},{"issue":"07","key":"ref37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"986","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00615.x","article-title":"Maternal and perinatal morbidity of caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour","volume":"112","author":"V M Allen","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000223871.69852.31","article-title":"Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery","volume":"108","author":"J U Hibbard","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"08","key":"ref39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1111\/obr.12288","article-title":"Risks associated with obesity in pregnancy, for the mother and baby: a systematic review of reviews","volume":"16","author":"J Marchi","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obes Rev"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"244.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.06.014","article-title":"Contemporary labor patterns: the impact of maternal body mass index","volume":"205","author":"M A Kominiarek","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"637","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)90585-5","article-title":"The impact of mandated in-hospital coverage on primary cesarean delivery rates in a large nonuniversity teaching hospital","volume":"172","author":"S K Klasko","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref42","first-page":"1013","article-title":"Effect of departmental policies on cesarean delivery rates: a community hospital experience","volume":"91","author":"P A Poma","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"716","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001032","article-title":"The Association of expanded access to a collaborative Midwifery and Laborist Model with cesarean delivery rates","volume":"126","author":"M G Rosenstein","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.08.032","article-title":"Obstetrician call schedule and obstetric outcomes among women eligible for a trial of labor after cesarean","volume":"216","author":"L M Yee","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Perinatology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/products\/ejournals\/pdf\/10.1055\/a-2864-0651.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,11]],"date-time":"2026-05-11T23:07:31Z","timestamp":1778540851000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/DOI\/DOI?10.1055\/a-2864-0651"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]]},"references-count":43,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/a-2864-0651","archive":["Portico","CLOCKSS"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0735-1631","1098-8785"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0735-1631","type":"print"},{"value":"1098-8785","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]]}}}