{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,16]],"date-time":"2026-10-16T23:40:28Z","timestamp":1792194028136,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Georg Thieme Verlag KG","issue":"13","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Knee Surg"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Structural cartilage restoration strategies provide mechanical solutions for focal knee chondral defects in which biologic repair alone is unlikely to withstand load-bearing demands. These approaches are most applicable to discrete lesions in otherwise preserved joints where restoration of articular congruity and immediate mechanical stability are required. This review evaluates focal resurfacing implants and osteochondral autograft transfer system procedures as structural joint-preserving interventions. Contemporary metal and polymer-based focal implants demonstrate meaningful short- to mid-term improvements in pain and function. However, registry data and meta-analyses reveal variable survivorship and revision risk, frequently related to progressive osteoarthritis or implant-related complications. Outcomes are highly dependent on appropriate patient selection and precise implant positioning. Osteochondral autograft transfer system procedures and mosaicplasty restore mature hyaline cartilage and subchondral bone using autologous osteochondral plugs. Long-term series extending beyond a decade support durable outcomes in small, contained lesions. Donor-site morbidity, graft contouring limitations, and size constraints, however, restrict broader applicability. Comparative data highlight trade-offs between mechanical resurfacing and cartilage transfer. Implants avoid donor harvest, but introduce device survivorship concerns and complex revision pathways. Autograft transfer offers established durability with native tissue, but carries technical constraints and harvest-related morbidity. Structural restoration strategies occupy a defined position within the cartilage preservation continuum. Their success depends on alignment between defect characteristics, patient activity demands, and the surrounding joint environment. When applied within appropriate indications, these techniques can provide durable symptom relief, though none of them eliminates the risk of progression to arthroplasty.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1055\/a-2865-1789","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,18]],"date-time":"2026-05-18T22:46:28Z","timestamp":1779144388000},"page":"678-687","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Contemporary Management of Knee Chondral Defects, Part II: Structural Cartilage Restoration with Focal Resurfacing Implants and Osteochondral Autograft Transfer"],"prefix":"10.1055","volume":"39","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8509-8120","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Chase W.","family":"Smitterberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, LifeBridge Health Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland, United States"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Giles R.","family":"Scuderi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, United States"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael A.","family":"Mont","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, LifeBridge Health Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland, United States"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"194","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1016\/j.knee.2024.02.013","article-title":"Focal resurfacing of the knee\u2014a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"48","author":"E Mikova","year":"2024","journal-title":"Knee"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1243","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-021-04251-x","article-title":"Femoral condyle resurfacing using an inlay metal implant: low revision rate of 266 patients in a 5-10 years follow-up","volume":"143","author":"P D Megaloikonomos","year":"2023","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"issue":"09","key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1753","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-011-1757-9","article-title":"Prosthetic inlay resurfacing for the treatment of focal, full thickness cartilage defects of the femoral condyle: a bridge between biologics and conventional arthroplasty","volume":"20","author":"P Bollars","year":"2012","journal-title":"Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc"},{"issue":"08","key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1135","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-011-1323-4","article-title":"Minimum 5-year results of focal articular prosthetic resurfacing for the treatment of full-thickness articular cartilage defects in the knee","volume":"131","author":"C Becher","year":"2011","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"key":"ref5","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Interventional Procedure Overview of Focal Resurfacing Implants to Treat Articular Cartilage Damage in the Knee","author":"NICE","year":"2022"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-019-03305-5","article-title":"Focal metallic inlay resurfacing prosthesis in articular cartilage defects: short-term results of 118 patients and 2 different implants","volume":"140","author":"\u015e \u00c7epni","year":"2020","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1016\/j.knee.2021.11.001","article-title":"Focal articular surface replacement as primary treatment for focal chondral defects of the femoral condyles: a series of 157 cases","volume":"34","author":"J van der Stok","year":"2022","journal-title":"Knee"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"900S","DOI":"10.1177\/19476035211030983","article-title":"Eighty percent survival of resurfacing implants in the knee after 10 years: a nationwide cohort study on 379 procedures from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry","volume":"13","author":"B B Christensen","year":"2021","journal-title":"Cartilage"},{"key":"ref9","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty: 2020 Annual Report","year":"2020"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.52628\/87.1.12","article-title":"The partial femoral condyle focal resurfacing (HemiCAP-UniCAP) for treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects, systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"87","author":"H Elbardesy","year":"2021","journal-title":"Acta Orthop Belg"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"484","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joca.2015.09.009","article-title":"Treatment of full thickness focal cartilage lesions with a metallic resurfacing implant in a sheep animal model, 1 year evaluation","volume":"24","author":"N Martinez-Carranza","year":"2016","journal-title":"Osteoarthritis Cartilage"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.1177\/1947603517720260","article-title":"Cartilage health in knees treated with metal resurfacing implants or untreated focal cartilage lesions: a preclinical study in sheep","volume":"10","author":"N Martinez-Carranza","year":"2019","journal-title":"Cartilage"},{"issue":"07","key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2196","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-017-4805-2","article-title":"No implant migration and good subjective outcome of a novel customized femoral resurfacing metal implant for focal chondral lesions","volume":"26","author":"A St\u00e5lman","year":"2018","journal-title":"Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc"},{"issue":"09","key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2899","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-020-06289-7","article-title":"Patient-specific metal implants for focal chondral and osteochondral lesions in the knee; excellent clinical results at 2 years","volume":"29","author":"J Holz","year":"2021","journal-title":"Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc"},{"key":"ref16","first-page":"379","article-title":"Patient-specific implants for focal cartilage lesions in the knee: implant survivorship analysis up to seven years post-implantation","volume":"38","author":"L Ryd","year":"2020","journal-title":"Surg Technol Int"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1247","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-021-06749-8","article-title":"Patient-specific resurfacing implant knee surgery in subjects with early osteoarthritis results in medial pivot and lateral femoral rollback during flexion: a retrospective pilot study","volume":"31","author":"P Moewis","year":"2023","journal-title":"Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"150964","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsm.2022.150964","article-title":"Next-generation cartilage repair and the prearthroplasty patient prearthroplasty artificial implants Part A: BioPoly","volume":"30","author":"J Cruickshank","year":"2022","journal-title":"Oper Tech Sports Med"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0011","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.OA.16.00011","article-title":"Partial resurfacing of the knee with the BioPoly implant: interim report at 2 years","volume":"2","author":"D Nathwani","year":"2017","journal-title":"JBJS Open Access"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e23.00008","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.OA.23.00008","article-title":"The BioPoly partial resurfacing knee implant provides beneficial clinical outcomes: a concise follow-up, at 5 years, of a previous report","volume":"8","author":"D Nathwani","year":"2023","journal-title":"JBJS Open Access"},{"issue":"41","key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2205662","DOI":"10.1002\/adfm.202205662","article-title":"A synthetic hydrogel composite with a strength and wear resistance greater than cartilage","volume":"32","author":"J Zhao","year":"2022","journal-title":"Adv Funct Mater"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100631","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jisako.2025.100631","article-title":"First-in-human study of biomimetic synthetic cartilage implant to treat painful knee cartilage leasions","volume":"12","author":"M E Domzalski","year":"2025","journal-title":"J ISAKOS"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"900","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.H.00668","article-title":"Articular cartilage degeneration following the treatment of focal cartilage defects with ceramic metal implants and compared with microfracture","volume":"91","author":"R J Custers","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joca.2009.10.009","article-title":"Cartilage degeneration in the goat knee caused by treating localized cartilage defects with metal implants","volume":"18","author":"R JH Custers","year":"2010","journal-title":"Osteoarthritis Cartilage"},{"issue":"08","key":"ref32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1421","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2012.11.020","article-title":"Preclinical evaluation of a novel implant for treatment of a full-thickness distal femoral focal cartilage defect","volume":"28","author":"E I Waldorff","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1016\/j.csm.2017.02.006","article-title":"Osteochondral autologous transplantation","volume":"36","author":"S L Sherman","year":"2017","journal-title":"Clin Sports Med"},{"key":"ref34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S32","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2008.01.041","article-title":"Autologous osteochondral grafting\u2014technique and long-term results","volume":"39","author":"L Hangody","year":"2008","journal-title":"Injury"},{"issue":"S 02","key":"ref35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200300002-00004","article-title":"Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of full-thickness defects of weight-bearing joints: ten years of experimental and clinical experience","volume":"85-A","author":"L Hangody","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"826","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546517745281","article-title":"Randomized study of long-term (15-17 years) outcome after microfracture versus mosaicplasty in knee articular cartilage defects","volume":"46","author":"E Solheim","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Sports Med"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1207","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-014-2843-6","article-title":"Microfracture technique versus osteochondral autologous transplantation mosaicplasty in patients with articular chondral lesions of the knee: a prospective randomized trial with long-term follow-up","volume":"22","author":"S Ulstein","year":"2014","journal-title":"Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.85B2.13543","article-title":"A prospective, randomised comparison of autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for osteochondral defects in the knee","volume":"85","author":"G Bentley","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"}],"container-title":["The Journal of Knee Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/products\/ejournals\/pdf\/10.1055\/a-2865-1789.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,16]],"date-time":"2026-10-16T22:44:10Z","timestamp":1792190650000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/DOI\/DOI?10.1055\/a-2865-1789"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,18]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"13","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,16]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,11]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/a-2865-1789","archive":["Portico","CLOCKSS"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1538-8506","1938-2480"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1538-8506","type":"print"},{"value":"1938-2480","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,18]]}}}