{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,29]],"date-time":"2022-03-29T21:55:52Z","timestamp":1648590952076},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Georg Thieme Verlag KG","issue":"02","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Zentralbl Chir"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,4]]},"DOI":"10.1055\/s-0029-1222508","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,4,21]],"date-time":"2009-04-21T20:43:55Z","timestamp":1240346635000},"page":"104-105","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["1 Fall - 2 Feststellungen des BGH zur hypothetischen Aufkl\u00e4rung - Anforderung des BGH \u00fcberzogen?"],"prefix":"10.1055","volume":"134","member":"194","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2009,4,21]]},"container-title":["Zentralblatt f\u00fcr Chirurgie"],"original-title":[],"language":"de","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/products\/ejournals\/html\/10.1055\/s-0029-1222508","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,22]],"date-time":"2017-05-22T14:40:39Z","timestamp":1495464039000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/DOI\/DOI?10.1055\/s-0029-1222508"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2009,4]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"02","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,4]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0029-1222508","relation":{},"ISSN":["0044-409X","1438-9592"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0044-409X","type":"print"},{"value":"1438-9592","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2009,4]]}}}