{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,18]],"date-time":"2024-07-18T19:40:16Z","timestamp":1721331616882},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Federa\u00e7\u00e3o das Associa\u00e7\u00f5es de Ginecologia e Obstetr\u00edcia","issue":"06","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,29]],"date-time":"2018-05-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1527552000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Objective\u2003To determine which mode and potency of electrocoagulation, using a modern electrosurgical generator, yields the smallest unobstructed area of the Fallopian tubes.<\/jats:p><jats:p>Methods\u2003In an experimental study, tubes from 48 hysterectomies or tubal ligation were evaluated. Tubes were randomly allocated to one of the following groups: group A) 25\u2009W x 5\u2009seconds (n\u2009=\u200917); group B) 30\u2009W x 5\u2009seconds (n\u2009=\u200917); group C) 35\u2009W x 5\u2009seconds (n\u2009=\u200918), group D) 40\u2009W x 5\u2009seconds (n\u2009=\u200920); group E) 40\u2009W x 5\u2009seconds with visual inspection (blanch, swells, collapse) (n\u2009=\u200916); group F) 50\u2009W x 5\u2009seconds (n\u2009=\u20098). Bipolar electrocoagulation was performed in groups A to E, and monopolar electrocoagulation was performed in group F. Coagulation mode was used in all groups. Digital photomicrography of the transversal histological sections of the isthmic segment of the Fallopian tube were taken, and the median percentage of unobstructed luminal area (mm2) was measured with ImageJ software (ImageJ, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The Kruskal-Wallis test or analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical analysis.<\/jats:p><jats:p>Results\u2003Ninety-six Fallopian tube sections were analyzed. The smallest median occluded area (%; range) of the Fallopian tube was obtained in the group with 40\u2009W with visual inspection (8.3%; 0.9\u201340%), followed by the groups 25\u2009W (9.1%; 0\u201335.9%), 40\u2009W (14.2; 0.9\u201343.2%), 30\u2009W (14.2; 0.9\u201349.7%), 35\u2009W (15.1; 3\u201346.4%) and 50\u2009W (38.2; 3.1\u201351%). No statistically significant difference was found among groups (p\u2009=\u20090.09, Kruskal-Wallis test).<\/jats:p><jats:p>Conclusion\u2003The smallest unobstructed area was obtained with power setting at 40\u2009W with visual inspection using a modern electrosurgical generator. However, no statistically significant difference in the unobstructed area was observed among the groups using these different modes and potencies.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0038-1656718","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,29]],"date-time":"2018-05-29T23:23:15Z","timestamp":1527636195000},"page":"332-337","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Which mode and potency of electrocoagulation yields the Smallest Unobstructed Area of the Fallopian Tubes?"],"prefix":"10.61622","volume":"40","author":[{"given":"Marcelo Ivo","family":"Campagnolo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ricardo dos","family":"Reis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Marcele Oliveira dos","family":"Santos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"L\u00facia Maria","family":"Kliemann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ricardo Francalacci","family":"Savaris","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"47794","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,29]]},"reference":[{"issue":"01","key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.10.003","article-title":"Contraceptive method use in the United States: trends and characteristics between 2008, 2012 and 2014","volume":"97","author":"M L Kavanaugh","year":"2018","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1161","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70658-0","article-title":"The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization","volume":"174","author":"H B Peterson","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"392","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000426425.33845.b2","article-title":"ACOG Practice bulletin no. 133: benefits and risks of sterilization","volume":"121","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref5","first-page":"60","article-title":"Reducing bipolar sterilization failures","volume":"74","author":"R M Soderstrom","year":"1989","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref6","volume-title":"Tubal sterilization","author":"C D Canela","year":"2017"},{"key":"ref8","volume-title":"Manual de Orienta\u00e7\u00e3o Anticoncep\u00e7\u00e3o","year":"2010"},{"key":"ref9","first-page":"156","volume-title":"Electrosurgical Unit (ESU)","author":"J Pearce","year":"2006"},{"key":"ref10","first-page":"257","volume":"5","year":"1996","journal-title":"Gynaecol Endosc"},{"issue":"12","key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1921","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1783","article-title":"Sample sizes for clinical trials with normal data","volume":"23","author":"S A Julious","year":"2004","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"ref12","volume-title":"Minimally invasive surgery","author":"B L Hoffman","year":"2012"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref13","first-page":"163","article-title":"Pregnancy after tubal sterilization with bipolar electrocoagulation","volume":"94","author":"H B Peterson","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0b013e3283073ab7","article-title":"The evolutionary state of electrosurgery: where are we now?","volume":"20","author":"A P Advincula","year":"2008","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref15","first-page":"210","article-title":"Comparison of HSCORE assessment of endometrial beta3 integrin subunit expression with digital HSCORE using computerized image analysis (ImageJ)","volume":"35","author":"D G Fuhrich","year":"2013","journal-title":"Anal Quant Cytopathol Histpathol"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"554","DOI":"10.1525\/abt.2011.73.9.9","article-title":"A quick & automated method for measuring cell area using ImageJ","volume":"73","author":"S N Baviskar","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am Biol Teach"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470089941.eta03cs03","article-title":"Digital image processing and analysis with ImageJ","volume":"3","author":"S R Gallagher","year":"2010","journal-title":"Curr Protoc Essent Lab Tech"},{"key":"ref19","volume-title":"Image Processing with ImageJ. 2nd ed","author":"J Broeke","year":"2015"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"443","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(91)90114-7","article-title":"The interaction of electrosurgical bipolar forceps and generators on an animal model of fallopian tube sterilization","volume":"165","author":"R D Tucker","year":"1991","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetr\u00edcia \/ RBGO Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journalrbgo.org\/article\/which-mode-and-potency-of-electrocoagulation-yields-the-smallest-unobstructed-area-of-the-fallopian-tubes\/","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/products\/ejournals\/pdf\/10.1055\/s-0038-1656718.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,18]],"date-time":"2024-07-18T18:59:54Z","timestamp":1721329194000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/DOI\/DOI?10.1055\/s-0038-1656718"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,29]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"06","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,6]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,6]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0038-1656718","archive":["Portico","CLOCKSS"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0100-7203","1806-9339"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0100-7203","type":"print"},{"value":"1806-9339","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,29]]}}}