{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T20:42:02Z","timestamp":1792096922274,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Georg Thieme Verlag KG","issue":"02","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,11]],"date-time":"2018-06-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1528675200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":71,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["AJP Rep"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>\n            Objective\u2003The objective of this study is to identify characteristics of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) practice that influence successful retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n            Study Design\u2003In this qualitative study, top, improved, and bottom performing NICUs in the California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative were identified based on ROP screening rates and invited to participate. NICU personnel were interviewed using a semistructured questionnaire. Using thematic analysis, key factors that influence ROP screening were identified.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n            Results\u2003Themes found in top performing hospitals include a commitment to quality improvement, a committed ophthalmologist, and a system of double checks. Improved NICUs had a common theme of utilizing telemedicine for exams and identification of eligible neonates on admission. The bottom performing hospital struggled with education and identification of eligible neonates and a lack of a dedicated ophthalmologist.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n            Conclusion\u2003Structure, culture, education, and commitment all contribute to the success of ROP screening in the NICU.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0038-1660519","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,11]],"date-time":"2018-06-11T23:43:55Z","timestamp":1528760635000},"page":"e128-e133","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["A Qualitative Analysis of Challenges and Successes in Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening"],"prefix":"10.1055","volume":"08","author":[{"given":"Lisa","family":"Bain","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pediatrics, Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alexandria","family":"Kristensen-Cabrera","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pediatrics, Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Henry","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pediatrics, Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"194","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,11]]},"container-title":["American Journal of Perinatology Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/products\/ejournals\/pdf\/10.1055\/s-0038-1660519.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,6]],"date-time":"2019-05-06T20:19:48Z","timestamp":1557173988000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/DOI\/DOI?10.1055\/s-0038-1660519"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,4]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"02","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,4,9]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,4]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0038-1660519","relation":{},"ISSN":["2157-6998","2157-7005"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2157-6998","type":"print"},{"value":"2157-7005","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,4]]}}}