{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,24]],"date-time":"2026-10-24T22:35:15Z","timestamp":1792881315117,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":13,"publisher":"Federa\u00e7\u00e3o das Associa\u00e7\u00f5es de Ginecologia e Obstetr\u00edcia","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,30]],"date-time":"2020-11-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1606694400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":29,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>\n          Objective\u2003To determine whether there was any difference in neonatal and maternal outcomes between breech vaginal delivery and cephalic vaginal delivery.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n          Methods\u2003A retrospective, case-control study was conducted between January 2015 and December 2017 in a Portuguese hospital. A total of 26 cases of breech vaginal delivery were considered eligible and 52 pregnant women formed the control group.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n          Results\u2003Induced labor was more frequent in the breech vaginal delivery group (46% versus 21%, p\u2009=\u20090.022). Episiotomy was more common in the breech vaginal delivery group (80% versus 52%, p\u2009=\u20090.014), and one woman had a 3rd degree perineal laceration. Newborns in the study group had a lower birthweight (2,805\u2009g versus 3,177\u2009g, p\u2009&lt;\u20090.001). There was no significant difference in the neonatal outcomes.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n          Conclusion\u2003The present study showed that breech vaginal delivery at term compared with cephalic presentation was not associated with significant differences in neonatal and maternal morbidity. It also suggests that breech vaginal delivery remains a safe option under strict selection criteria and in the presence of an experienced obstetrician.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0040-1713804","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,1]],"date-time":"2020-12-01T00:22:57Z","timestamp":1606782177000},"page":"712-716","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Is Vaginal Breech Delivery Still a Safe Option?"],"prefix":"10.61622","volume":"42","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1173-6171","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maria","family":"Pulido Valente","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universit\u00e1rio Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7503-3195","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maria","family":"Carvalho Afonso","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universit\u00e1rio Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4370-369X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nuno","family":"Clode","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universit\u00e1rio Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"47794","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1016\/s0140-6736(00)02840-3","article-title":"Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial","volume":"356","author":"M E Hannah","year":"2000","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"864","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.056","article-title":"Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial","volume":"191","author":"H Whyte","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.08.039","article-title":"Five years to the term breech trial: the rise and fall of a randomized controlled trial","volume":"194","author":"M Glezerman","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.817","article-title":"Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium","volume":"194","author":"F Goffinet","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d","article-title":"Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery","volume":"123","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"833","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-016-4283-7","article-title":"Breech presentation at term and associated obstetric risks factors-a nationwide population based cohort study","volume":"295","author":"G Macharey","year":"2017","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000113625.29073.4c","article-title":"Singleton vaginal breech delivery at term: still a safe option","volume":"103","author":"M Alarab","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13524","article-title":"The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for term breech birth: a meta-analysis including observational studies","volume":"123","author":"Y Berhan","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e151","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14465","article-title":"Penna LK on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of breech presentation","volume":"124","author":"L WM Impey","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e60","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002755","article-title":"ACOG Committee Opinion No. 745: mode of term singleton breech delivery","volume":"132","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref11","first-page":"191","article-title":"[The debate on breach presentation: Delivery of breach presentations: the position of the National College of French gynecologists]","volume":"30","author":"B Carbonne","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"issue":"09","key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"632","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gofs.2018.07.003","article-title":"[Comparison of obstetric prognosis of attempts of breech delivery: Spontaneous labor versus induced labor]","volume":"46","author":"A Breton","year":"2018","journal-title":"Gyn\u00e9col Obst\u00e9t Fertil S\u00e9nol"},{"issue":"07","key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"885","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13557","article-title":"Is induction of labor a reasonable option for breech presentation?","volume":"98","author":"T Gaillard","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"}],"container-title":["Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetr\u00edcia \/ RBGO Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journalrbgo.org\/article\/is-vaginal-breech-delivery-still-a-safe-option\/","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/products\/ejournals\/pdf\/10.1055\/s-0040-1713804.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,18]],"date-time":"2024-07-18T20:55:51Z","timestamp":1721336151000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journalrbgo.org\/article\/is-vaginal-breech-delivery-still-a-safe-option\/"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,11]]},"references-count":13,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,30]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,11]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0040-1713804","archive":["Portico","CLOCKSS"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0100-7203","1806-9339"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0100-7203","type":"print"},{"value":"1806-9339","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,11]]}}}