{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]],"date-time":"2026-10-20T03:44:36Z","timestamp":1792467876204,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"Georg Thieme Verlag KG","issue":"05","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Facial Plast Surg"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Recently, dorsal preservation rhinoplasty has been gained acceptance among facial plastic surgeons. Despite this, there is limited literature on patient satisfaction following preservation rhinoplasty. This systematic review aims to evaluate all studies quantifying patient satisfaction and to compare results between structural and dorsal preservation rhinoplasty. OVID Medline, EMBASE, and PubMed databases were searched. All studies from the years 2010 to 2020 evaluating satisfaction in patients receiving either structural or dorsal preservation rhinoplasty were included. Data regarding study demographics as well as patient satisfaction results were extracted from included studies. Descriptive results and analysis were calculated. A total of 2,172 articles were initially identified, of which 29 articles were included in the final analysis. Of the 29 articles, 25 were focused on structural rhinoplasty and 4 were focused on preservation rhinoplasty. Of the 25 structural rhinoplasty articles, 17 used the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire to evaluate patient satisfaction and 5 used the FACE-Q scale. Among the 25 structural rhinoplasty studies, 14 (56%) reported statistically significant improvements in patient satisfaction evaluation scores after rhinoplasty. Among the four preservation rhinoplasty studies, one (25%) study reported significant improvements in satisfaction scores after rhinoplasty. Despite this, most studies included a statement that satisfaction improved in patients following rhinoplasty. Literature in this review supports both structural and preservation rhinoplasty, resulting in high satisfactory results for patients following surgery. More research must be conducted to further quantify satisfaction following preservation rhinoplasty and prospectively compare satisfaction between the two rhinoplasty techniques.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0040-1714268","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,4]],"date-time":"2020-08-04T22:52:45Z","timestamp":1596581565000},"page":"670-678","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["Patient Satisfaction following Structural versus Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review"],"prefix":"10.1055","volume":"36","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2345-5222","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marc","family":"Levin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hedyeh","family":"Ziai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael","family":"Roskies","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"194","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,4]]},"reference":[{"issue":"06","key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"990","DOI":"10.1097\/MLG.0b013e31805366ed","article-title":"Upper lateral cartilage-sparing component dorsal hump reduction in primary rhinoplasty","volume":"117","author":"E Arslan","year":"2007","journal-title":"Laryngoscope"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1298","DOI":"10.1097\/01.PRS.0000135861.45986.CF","article-title":"Component dorsal hump reduction: the importance of maintaining dorsal aesthetic lines in rhinoplasty","volume":"114","author":"R J Rohrich","year":"2004","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1093\/asj\/sjz063","article-title":"Dorsal roof technique for dorsum preservation in rhinoplasty","volume":"40","author":"S Ta\u015f","year":"2020","journal-title":"Aesthet Surg J"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1093\/asj\/sjx180","article-title":"Dorsal preservation: the push down technique reassessed","volume":"38","author":"Y Saban","year":"2018","journal-title":"Aesthet Surg J"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0039-1695751","article-title":"Nasal profile hump reduction using the let-down technique","volume":"35","author":"J J Montes-Bracchini","year":"2019","journal-title":"Facial Plast Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1057","DOI":"10.1093\/asj\/sjz029","article-title":"Functional\/aesthetic measures of patient satisfaction after rhinoplasty: a review","volume":"39","author":"H Xiao","year":"2019","journal-title":"Aesthet Surg J"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"603","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000004102","article-title":"Evaluation of preoperative and postoperative patient satisfaction and quality of life in patients undergoing rhinoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"141","author":"F Yang","year":"2018","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1093\/asj\/sjx258","article-title":"The preservation rhinoplasty: a new rhinoplasty revolution","volume":"38","author":"R K Daniel","year":"2018","journal-title":"Aesthet Surg J"},{"issue":"21","key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"b2700","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.b2700","article-title":"The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration","volume":"339","author":"A Liberati","year":"2009","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"09","key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e2448","DOI":"10.1097\/GOX.0000000000002448","article-title":"Assessment of rhinoplasty outcomes with FACE-Q rhinoplasty module: Norwegian linguistic validation and clinical application in 243 patients","volume":"7","author":"A Kalaaji","year":"2019","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref13","first-page":"76","article-title":"Normal values for the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire","volume":"78","author":"S C Izu","year":"2012","journal-title":"Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed)"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1001\/jamafacial.2015.1445","article-title":"Development and psychometric evaluation of the FACE-Q scales for patients undergoing rhinoplasty","volume":"18","author":"A F Klassen","year":"2016","journal-title":"JAMA Facial Plast Surg"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1007\/s12070-019-01712-z","article-title":"Outcome and pitfalls of open rhinoplasty","volume":"72","author":"P Manhas","year":"2020","journal-title":"Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"973e","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000002760","article-title":"Postoperative edema resolution following rhinoplasty: a three-dimensional morphometric assessment","volume":"138","author":"S Pavri","year":"2016","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref18","first-page":"345","article-title":"Comparison of the effects of external and internal lateral nasal osteotomies on ecchymosis, periorbital edema, and step off deformity after rhinoplasty","volume":"8","author":"M Gholami","year":"2019","journal-title":"World J Plast Surg"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"891","DOI":"10.1007\/s00266-020-01660-y","article-title":"Push-down technique without osteotomy: a new approach","volume":"44","author":"G \u00d6zt\u00fcrk","year":"2020","journal-title":"Aesthetic Plast Surg"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1111\/coa.12099","article-title":"Deviated nose attenuates the degree of patient satisfaction and quality of life in rhinoplasty: a prospective controlled study","volume":"38","author":"C Cingi","year":"2013","journal-title":"Clin Otolaryngol"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjps.2017.08.008","article-title":"Does self-consciousness of appearance influence postoperative satisfaction in rhinoplasty?","volume":"71","author":"J M Herruer","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"729","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-017-4860-9","article-title":"Satisfaction in rhinoplasty: the possible impact of anxiety and functional outcome","volume":"275","author":"S Koybasi","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1007\/s00266-011-9805-x","article-title":"Influence of age on rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation: a preliminary study","volume":"36","author":"L M Arima","year":"2012","journal-title":"Aesthetic Plast Surg"},{"issue":"07","key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2809","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-017-4566-z","article-title":"Assessment of satisfaction based on age and gender in functional and aesthetic rhinoplasty","volume":"274","author":"S AlHarethy","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol"},{"issue":"12","key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1238","DOI":"10.15537\/smj.2018.12.23269","article-title":"Does skin thickness affect satisfaction post rhinoplasty? Middle Eastern population as an example","volume":"39","author":"S Alharethy","year":"2018","journal-title":"Saudi Med J"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.4193\/Rhin16.243","article-title":"Quality of life after primary septorhinoplasty in deviated- and non-deviated nose measured with ROE, FROI-17 and SF-36","volume":"55","author":"O C Bulut","year":"2017","journal-title":"Rhinology"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"322","DOI":"10.1177\/000348941212100507","article-title":"Comparative analysis of primary and secondary rhinoplasties according to surgeon's perspective, patient satisfaction, and quality of life","volume":"121","author":"C Cingi","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1635","DOI":"10.1007\/s00266-018-1199-6","article-title":"Systematic review of quality-of-life measurement after aesthetic rhinoplasty","volume":"42","author":"M S W\u00e4hmann","year":"2018","journal-title":"Aesthetic Plast Surg"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1097\/SCS.0000000000000638","article-title":"Satisfaction outcomes in open functional septorhinoplasty: prospective analysis","volume":"25","author":"H H Balikci","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Craniofac Surg"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1007\/s00238-017-1387-7","article-title":"Rhinoplasty in elderly patients: analysis of outcomes and patient's satisfaction following 20 years experiences","volume":"41","author":"M Barone","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Plast Surg"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"420","DOI":"10.1097\/SCS.0000000000002321","article-title":"Assessment of patient satisfaction with evaluation methods in open technique septorhinoplasty","volume":"27","author":"E Ba\u015fer","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Craniofac Surg"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1308\/003588414X14055925059075","article-title":"Patient reported outcome measures in septorhinoplasty surgery","volume":"97","author":"T C Biggs","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann R Coll Surg Engl"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref33","first-page":"71","article-title":"Evaluation of postoperative patient satisfaction after covering the nasal dorsum with upper lateral cartilage: \u201cupper lateral closing\u201d","volume":"85","author":"C A \u00c7a\u011f\u0131c\u0131","year":"2019","journal-title":"Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed)"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"461","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0037-1606637","article-title":"Measuring patient-reported outcomes in rhinoplasty using the FACE-Q: a single site study","volume":"33","author":"C East","year":"2017","journal-title":"Facial Plast Surg"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref35","first-page":"552","article-title":"Evaluation of aesthetic and functional outcomes in rhinoplasty surgery: a prospective study","volume":"83","author":"S Sena Esteves","year":"2017","journal-title":"Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed)"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref36","first-page":"437","article-title":"Avalia\u00e7\u00e3o tardia em rinoplastia est\u00e9tica em um centro acad\u00eamico de refer\u00eancia","volume":"76","author":"G B Faidiga","year":"2010","journal-title":"Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed)"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1001\/jamafacial.2018.2118","article-title":"Analysis of patient-perceived nasal appearance evaluations following functional septorhinoplasty with spreader graft placement","volume":"21","author":"J C Fuller","year":"2019","journal-title":"JAMA Facial Plast Surg"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1097\/SAP.0000000000001472","article-title":"Availability and safety of osteotomy in esthetic rhinoplasty of East Asian patients","volume":"81","author":"J Y Jeong","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ann Plast Surg"},{"key":"ref39","first-page":"5","article-title":"Cosmetic satisfaction in patients undergone septorhinoplasty","volume":"\u2022\u2022\u2022","author":"T Z Khan","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Med Sci"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1579","DOI":"10.1097\/SCS.0000000000005642","article-title":"Comparison of patient satisfaction between composite and dorsum augmentation-only nasal reconstructions with diced cartilage graft wrapped in fascia","volume":"30","author":"A \u00c7er\u00e7i \u00d6zkan","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Craniofac Surg"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"745","DOI":"10.1007\/s00405-018-05269-5","article-title":"Functional and aesthetic results after septorhinoplasty and concomitant radiofrequency of the inferior turbinate: is there a role for patient reported outcome measures (PROMs)?","volume":"276","author":"C Parrilla","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1089\/fpsam.2020.0017","article-title":"A review and modification of dorsal preservation rhinoplasty techniques","volume":"22","author":"P N Patel","year":"2020","journal-title":"Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.2500\/ajra.2014.28.3991","article-title":"Spreader flaps do not change early functional outcomes in reduction rhinoplasty: a randomized control trial","volume":"28","author":"B Saedi","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Rhinol Allergy"},{"issue":"07","key":"ref44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"784","DOI":"10.1093\/asj\/sjv066","article-title":"Assessing demographic differences in patient-perceived improvement in facial appearance and quality of life following rhinoplasty","volume":"35","author":"J A Schwitzer","year":"2015","journal-title":"Aesthet Surg J"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1017\/S0022215120000638","article-title":"Post-rhinoplasty outcomes in an Indian population assessed using the FACE-Q appraisal scales: a prospective observational study","volume":"134","author":"K Soni","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Laryngol Otol"},{"issue":"08","key":"ref46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1659.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2016.04.013","article-title":"Piezotome rhinoplasty reduces postsurgical morbidity and enhances patient satisfaction: a multidisciplinary clinical study","volume":"74","author":"A Troedhan","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"378e","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000005909","article-title":"The probable reasons of dorsal hump problems following let-down \/ push-down rhinoplasty and solution proposals","volume":"144","author":"U Tuncel","year":"2019","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"}],"container-title":["Facial Plastic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/products\/ejournals\/pdf\/10.1055\/s-0040-1714268.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,5]],"date-time":"2023-10-05T08:23:15Z","timestamp":1696494195000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/DOI\/DOI?10.1055\/s-0040-1714268"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,4]]},"references-count":44,"journal-issue":{"issue":"05","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,24]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0040-1714268","relation":{},"ISSN":["0736-6825","1098-8793"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0736-6825","type":"print"},{"value":"1098-8793","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,4]]}}}