{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,19]],"date-time":"2025-03-19T10:42:40Z","timestamp":1742380960855,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Georg Thieme Verlag KG","issue":"06","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Wrist Surg"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>\n          Background\u2003Current elbow clinical scores are scarce with limited comparability between them. None of them are computerized yet. There is no forearm clinical score assessing all anatomical components of forearm disorders such as the Essex-Lopresti injuries. The aims of this paper were to present new computerized elbow and forearm clinical scores.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n          Methods\u2003These new computerized elbow and forearm clinical scores include four clinical criteria: pain, function, active range of motion and muscle strength. To each criterion is given a numerical value among 5 grades. The weight of each criterion is equivalent so that patient's and physician's related scores are equally balanced.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n          Results\u2003Clinical scores components are automatically included into diamond-shape graphs and tables that can be directly exported into PowerPoint presentations for demonstration and comparison purposes.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n          Discussion\u2003These user-friendly updatable clinical elbow and forearm scores are based on four classic clinical criteria, pain, function, motion, and strength that are expressed into grades. They were designed to evaluate any osteoarticular elbow or forearm disorder regardless of the etiology. These scores are open since they may be modified in future versions.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0042-1753507","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,26]],"date-time":"2022-09-26T23:02:07Z","timestamp":1664233327000},"page":"474-478","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["New Computerized Elbow and Forearm Clinical Scores"],"prefix":"10.1055","volume":"11","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3230-8267","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Guillaume","family":"Herzberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedics, I-Trues Surgery Unit, Clinique Parc Lyon, Lyon, France"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Marion","family":"Burnier","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedics, I-TRues Surgery Unit, Institut Main Membre Sup\u00e9rieur, Villeurbanne, France"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lyliane","family":"Ly","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Hospices Civils Lyon, Orthopedic Department, Lyon, France"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Toshiyatsu","family":"Nakamura","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, Japan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"194","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,26]]},"reference":[{"issue":"07","key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e2","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.RVW.18.00154","article-title":"Electronic patient-reported outcome collection systems in orthopaedic clinical practice","volume":"7","author":"V A Lizzio","year":"2019","journal-title":"JBJS Rev"},{"issue":"08","key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1253","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2018.08.017","article-title":"Outcomes of distal humerus fractures: What are we measuring?","volume":"104","author":"A Zarezadeh","year":"2018","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatol Surg Res"},{"issue":"14","key":"ref3","first-page":"E97 1","article-title":"Update on the state of outcome measurement in TEA research. identifying a need for consensus","volume":"95A","author":"K Riedel","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0037-1607328","article-title":"A new wrist clinical evaluation score","volume":"7","author":"G Herzberg","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Wrist Surg"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199802000-00002","article-title":"Validity of observer-based aggregate scoring systems as descriptors of elbow pain, function, and disability","volume":"80","author":"D C Turchin","year":"1998","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref6","first-page":"40","article-title":"Testing of pronation and supination strength in the outpatient setting: a preliminary study","volume":"26","author":"G Herzberg","year":"2007","journal-title":"Chir Main"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"200","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00313939","article-title":"Measuring muscle strength","volume":"231","author":"R JO van der Ploeg","year":"1984","journal-title":"J Neurol"},{"key":"ref8","volume-title":"Functional evaluation of the elbow","author":"B F Morrey","year":"1993","edition":"2nd ed."},{"issue":"06","key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1146","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jhsa.2014.01.041","article-title":"Accuracy and reliability of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score","volume":"39","author":"M C Cusick","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Hand Surg Am"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"351","DOI":"10.1016\/S1058-2746(99)90159-3","article-title":"A standardized method for assessment of elbow function. Research Committee, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons","volume":"8","author":"G JW King","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1380","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2013.04.013","article-title":"Elbow-specific clinical rating systems: extent of established validity, reliability, and responsiveness","volume":"22","author":"B The","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"466","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.90B4.20290","article-title":"The development and validation of a patient-reported questionnaire to assess outcomes of elbow surgery","volume":"90","author":"J Dawson","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"717","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2007.02.123","article-title":"Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the Constant score","volume":"16","author":"M K Gilbart","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2013.11.018","article-title":"Comparison of the subjective elbow value and the Mayo elbow performance score","volume":"23","author":"A G Schneeberger","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"}],"container-title":["Journal of Wrist Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/products\/ejournals\/pdf\/10.1055\/s-0042-1753507.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,9]],"date-time":"2022-12-09T00:33:37Z","timestamp":1670546017000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/DOI\/DOI?10.1055\/s-0042-1753507"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,26]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"06","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,8]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0042-1753507","archive":["Portico","CLOCKSS"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["2163-3916","2163-3924"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2163-3916"},{"type":"electronic","value":"2163-3924"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,26]]}}}