{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,28]],"date-time":"2025-05-28T21:39:38Z","timestamp":1748468378713,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Federa\u00e7\u00e3o das Associa\u00e7\u00f5es de Ginecologia e Obstetr\u00edcia","issue":"09","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,16]],"date-time":"2023-10-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1697414400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":45,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>\n          Objective\u2003To assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of Brazilian physicians about immediate postpartum and postabortion intrauterine device insertion.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n          Methods\u2003Cross-sectional online survey involving physicians on duty in public Brazilian hospitals. Participants answered an anonymous questionnaire with close-ended questions to assess their knowledge, attitude, and experience on the immediate postpartum and postabortion insertion of copper intrauterine devices.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n          Results\u2003One hundred twenty-seven physicians working in 23 hospitals in the 5 geographic regions of Brazil completed the questionnaire. Most were female (68.5%) and worked in teaching hospitals (95.3%). The mean (standard deviation) knowledge score (0\u201310 scale) was 5.3 (1.3); only 27.6% of the participants had overall scores \u2265 7.0. Most physicians (73.2%) would insert a postpartum intrauterine device in themselves\/family members. About 42% of respondents stated that they had not received any training on postpartum or postabortion intrauterine device insertion. In the past 12 months, 19.7%, 22.8%, and 53.5% of respondents stated they had not inserted any intrauterine device during a cesarean section, immediately after a vaginal delivery, or after an abortion, respectively.<\/jats:p><jats:p>\n          Conclusion\u2003Most study participants have a positive attitude toward the insertion of intrauterine devices in the immediate postpartum period, but they have limited knowledge about the use of this contraceptive method. A large percentage of respondents did not have previous training on postpartum and postabortion intrauterine device insertion and had not performed any such insertions in the last 12 months. Strategies are needed to improve the knowledge, training, and experience of Brazilian physicians on immediate postpartum and postabortion intrauterine device insertion.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0043-1772187","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,16]],"date-time":"2023-10-16T23:07:11Z","timestamp":1697497631000},"page":"e524-e534","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Brazilian Physicians about Immediate Postpartum and Postabortion Intrauterine Device Insertion"],"prefix":"10.61622","volume":"45","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4642-918X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Adalberto Kiochi","family":"Aguemi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Women's Health Technical Area, Secretaria Municipal da Sa\u00fade de S\u00e3o Paulo, SP, Brazil"},{"name":"Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de S\u00e3o Paulo, SP, Brazil"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4944-0720","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maria Regina","family":"Torloni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de S\u00e3o Paulo, SP, Brazil"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4547-7836","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mirna Namie","family":"Okamura","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Coordination of Epidemiology and Information, Secretaria Municipal da Sa\u00fade de S\u00e3o Paulo, SP, Brazil"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6985-0818","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Cristina Aparecida Falbo","family":"Guazzelli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de S\u00e3o Paulo, SP, Brazil"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"47794","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,16]]},"reference":[{"issue":"02","key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1363\/3509403","article-title":"The measurement and meaning of unintended pregnancy","volume":"35","author":"J Santelli","year":"2003","journal-title":"Perspect Sex Reprod Health"},{"issue":"09","key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1152","DOI":"10.1016\/S2214-109X(20)30315-6","article-title":"Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990-2019","volume":"8","author":"J Bearak","year":"2020","journal-title":"Lancet Glob Health"},{"issue":"08","key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1215","DOI":"10.1089\/jwh.2010.2379","article-title":"Pregnancy intention, demographic differences, and psychosocial health","volume":"20","author":"P Maxson","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Womens Health (Larchmt)"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.2147\/IJWH.S61543","article-title":"The burden of unintended pregnancies in Brazil: a social and public health system cost analysis","volume":"6","author":"H H Le","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Womens Health"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1111\/sifp.12085","article-title":"Global Contraceptive Failure Rates: Who Is Most at Risk?","volume":"50","author":"S EK Bradley","year":"2019","journal-title":"Stud Fam Plann"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.01.021","article-title":"Contraceptive failure in the United States","volume":"83","author":"J Trussell","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e227","DOI":"10.1016\/S2214-109X(18)30481-9","article-title":"Contraceptive use in Latin America and the Caribbean with a focus on long-acting reversible contraceptives: prevalence and inequalities in 23 countries","volume":"7","author":"R G Ponce de Leon","year":"2019","journal-title":"Lancet Glob Health"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.09.014","article-title":"Society of Family Planning Guidelines: Postplacental insertion of intrauterine devices","volume":"97","author":"A K Whitaker","year":"2018","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1111\/jmwh.12409","article-title":"Sexual Behavior, Satisfaction, and Contraceptive Use Among Postpartum Women","volume":"61","author":"C Sok","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Midwifery Womens Health"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820ce18c","article-title":"Return of ovulation and menses in postpartum nonlactating women: a systematic review","volume":"117","author":"E Jackson","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1186\/s40834-018-0078-5","article-title":"Ongoing barriers to immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception: a physician survey","volume":"3","author":"E C Holden","year":"2018","journal-title":"Contracept Reprod Med"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.08.016","article-title":"Society of Family Planning clinical recommendations: contraception after surgical abortion","volume":"99","author":"A H Roe","year":"2019","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"11","key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e48948","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0048948","article-title":"Early versus delayed insertion of intrauterine contraception after medical abortion - a randomized controlled trial","volume":"7","author":"I S\u00e4\u00e4v","year":"2012","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"07","key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD001777","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD001777.pub4","article-title":"Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices","volume":"2014","author":"B O Okusanya","year":"2014","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1186\/s12978-018-0543-2","article-title":"Long-acting reversible contraceptive use in the post-abortion period among women seeking abortion in mainland China: intentions and barriers","volume":"15","author":"Z Luo","year":"2018","journal-title":"Reprod Health"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1080\/03630242.2019.1616042","article-title":"Patients and providers' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception: a systematic review","volume":"60","author":"E L Thompson","year":"2020","journal-title":"Women Health"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1186\/s12978-021-01099-7","article-title":"Assessing knowledge, attitudes, and practice of health providers towards the provision of postpartum intrauterine devices in Nepal: a two-year follow-up","volume":"18","author":"L Stone","year":"2021","journal-title":"Reprod Health"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2014.09.010","article-title":"Maternity care provider knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding provision of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices at a tertiary center in Ghana","volume":"128","author":"D M Rupley","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1016\/j.whi.2015.03.013 1","article-title":"Barriers to Immediate Post-placental Intrauterine Devices among Attending Level Educators","volume":"25","author":"E Holland","year":"2015","journal-title":"Womens Health Issues"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"895","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002822","article-title":"Intrauterine Device Expulsion After Postpartum Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","volume":"132","author":"T C Jatlaoui","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"S 01","key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12600","article-title":"FIGO postpartum intrauterine device initiative: Complication rates across six countries","volume":"143","author":"A Makins","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"09","key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1706","DOI":"10.1007\/s10995-017-2320-1","article-title":"The Use of ACOG Guidelines: Perceived Contraindications to IUD and Implant Use Among Family Planning Providers","volume":"21","author":"A E Philliber","year":"2017","journal-title":"Matern Child Health J"},{"issue":"9837","key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(12)60609-6","article-title":"Contraception and health","volume":"380","author":"J Cleland","year":"2012","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0041-1725053","article-title":"Postplacental placement of intrauterine devices: acceptability, reasons for refusal and proposals to increase its use","volume":"43","author":"M BPL Kraft","year":"2021","journal-title":"Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1186\/s12978-019-0824-4","article-title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of postpartum contraceptive use among women in low- and middle-income countries","volume":"16","author":"R Dev","year":"2019","journal-title":"Reprod Health"},{"key":"ref32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1186\/1742-4755-10-7","article-title":"Current methods and attitudes of women towards contraception in Europe and America","volume":"10","author":"S Johnson","year":"2013","journal-title":"Reprod Health"}],"container-title":["Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetr\u00edcia \/ RBGO Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journalrbgo.org\/article\/knowledge-attitude-and-practice-of-brazilian-physicians-about-immediate-postpartum-and-postabortion-intrauterine-device-insertion\/","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/products\/ejournals\/pdf\/10.1055\/s-0043-1772187.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,18]],"date-time":"2024-07-18T20:55:49Z","timestamp":1721336149000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journalrbgo.org\/article\/knowledge-attitude-and-practice-of-brazilian-physicians-about-immediate-postpartum-and-postabortion-intrauterine-device-insertion\/"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,9]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"09","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,16]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,9]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0043-1772187","archive":["Portico","CLOCKSS"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0100-7203","1806-9339"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0100-7203"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1806-9339"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,9]]}}}