{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,4]],"date-time":"2026-08-04T17:57:15Z","timestamp":1785866235337,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Georg Thieme Verlag KG","issue":"03","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,9]],"date-time":"2025-10-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1759968000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur J Dent"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>To assess and compare the trueness (dimensional discrepancy and degree of deviation) of various methods of impressions for All-on-4 implants.<\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>This investigation employed a single-piece artificial mandibular jaw with four implants arranged in an All-on-4 configuration. Three impression methods were compared: one open-tray conventional impression digitized after pouring, and two intraoral scanners, TRIOS 5 and Runyes 3DS 3.0. A reference scan (control) was conducted with a laboratory-based scanner. All scans were performed using scan bodies and exported as Standard Tessellation Language (STL) files. A total of 30 STL scans were produced (n\u2009=\u200910). The dimensional discrepancy (along the X, Y, and Z axes) and the overall degree of deviation in the position were assessed. Data analysis was conducted using Brown\u2013Forsythe one-way analysis of variance and Tamhane's post hoc tests (p\u2009&lt;\u20090.05).<\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>The mean degree of deviation for scan bodies was as follows: TRIOS 5 (1.11\u2009\u00b1\u20090.06\u2009mm), Runyes 3DS (1.02\u2009\u00b1\u20090.05\u2009mm), and conventional (0.82\u2009\u00b1\u20090.16\u2009mm). Statistically significant differences were found among all impression methods (p\u2009&lt;\u20090.05). While the conventional method showed the highest trueness, it had the greatest standard deviation (SD, 0.16), which was the least consistent among them. The Runyes 3DS scans displayed the highest precision with the degree of deviation of 0.05 (\u00b1\u2009SD). Dimensional discrepancies mainly occur on the Z-axis across all three impression methods. Conventional impressions showed statistically significant discrepancies in the Y- and Z-axes, while TRIOS 5 images had statistically significant discrepancies in the X- and Z-axes. Runyes 3DS readings were statistically significantly discrepant in the Z-axis.<\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>While both conventional methods and digital scans have their merits, traditional impression methods may offer improved trueness in full-arch implant cases. Utilizing the open-tray system with suitable materials and methods can enhance precision and lead to more reliable outcomes.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0045-1811961","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,9]],"date-time":"2025-10-09T22:48:02Z","timestamp":1760050082000},"page":"979-987","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["The Trueness between Conventional Impression and Different Intraoral Scanners for All-on-4 Implants: An In vitro Comparative Study"],"prefix":"10.1055","volume":"20","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0922-2868","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Osamah A.","family":"Alsulimani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Abdulrahman J.","family":"Alhaddad","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Samar H.","family":"Abuzinadah","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0276-0532","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Saeed J.","family":"Alzahrani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hamed S.","family":"Alghamdi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Science, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Farah A.","family":"Ghander","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Internship Program, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Refad M.","family":"Magadmi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Internship Program, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"194","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,9]]},"reference":[{"issue":"01","key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.4103\/ejd.ejd_340_16","article-title":"Complications in implant dentistry","volume":"11","author":"A Hanif","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Dent"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.4103\/jips.jips_379_19","article-title":"Assessment of intraoral scanning technology for multiple implant impressions - a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"20","author":"S Kachhara","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Indian Prosthodont Soc"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref3","first-page":"8427595","article-title":"Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression","volume":"2017","author":"R Richert","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Healthc Eng"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1179\/1465313315Y.0000000001","article-title":"Orthodontic scanners: what's available?","volume":"42","author":"C B Martin","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Orthod"},{"issue":"12","key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6517","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-021-04157-3","article-title":"Intraoral scanning reduces procedure time and improves patient comfort in fixed prosthodontics and implant dentistry: a systematic review","volume":"25","author":"R Siqueira","year":"2021","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.12218","article-title":"Intraoral digital impression technique: a review","volume":"24","author":"S Ting-Shu","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Prosthodont"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref7","first-page":"2","article-title":"Implant digital impression with intraoral scanners: a literature review","volume":"21","author":"K-s Seo","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Implantol Appl Sci"},{"issue":"09","key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"747","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13395","article-title":"Clinical applications of intraoral scanning in removable prosthodontics: a literature review","volume":"30","author":"H S AlRumaih","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Prosthodont"},{"issue":"08","key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"787","DOI":"10.1177\/00220345241253794","article-title":"Recent advances in digital technology in implant dentistry","volume":"103","author":"J Wang","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Dent Res"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-017-0442-x","article-title":"Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature","volume":"17","author":"F Mangano","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Oral Health"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-019-0792-7","article-title":"Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: a comparative in vitro study","volume":"19","author":"F G Mangano","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMC Oral Health"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"853","DOI":"10.11607\/jomi.3343","article-title":"Accuracy of a digital impression system based on parallel confocal laser technology for implants with consideration of operator experience and implant angulation and depth","volume":"29","author":"B Gim\u00e9nez","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.11607\/jomi.3689","article-title":"Accuracy of two digital implant impression systems based on confocal microscopy with variations in customized software and clinical parameters","volume":"30","author":"B Gim\u00e9nez","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2006.01.003","article-title":"A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touch-probe scanner","volume":"95","author":"A Persson","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"issue":"13","key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1349","DOI":"10.1177\/00220345241271937","article-title":"Recent advances in intraoral scanners","volume":"103","author":"F Eggmann","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Dent Res"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref16","first-page":"e51537","article-title":"Digital impressions versus conventional impressions in prosthodontics: a systematic review","volume":"16","author":"S Ahmed","year":"2024","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.4067\/s2452-55882025000100010","article-title":"Analysis of the scanning performance of dental implants using different intraoral scanners: accuracy study","volume":"18","author":"B L Almeida-Silva","year":"2025","journal-title":"Int J Interdiscip Dent"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1186\/s40729-024-00543-0","article-title":"A systematic review of factors impacting intraoral scanning accuracy in implant dentistry with emphasis on scan bodies","volume":"10","author":"P Gehrke","year":"2024","journal-title":"Int J Implant Dent"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6831-14-10","article-title":"Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients' perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes","volume":"14","author":"E Yuzbasioglu","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC Oral Health"},{"issue":"S 01","key":"ref20","first-page":"121","article-title":"Misfit of implant prostheses and its impact on clinical outcomes. Definition, assessment and a systematic review of the literature","volume":"10","author":"J Katsoulis","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Oral Implantology"},{"issue":"08","key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4719","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph19084719","article-title":"Investigation of the accuracy of four intraoral scanners in mandibular full-arch digital implant impression: a comparative in vitro study","volume":"19","author":"A Di Fiore","year":"2022","journal-title":"Int J Environ Res Public Health"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.13951","article-title":"Accuracy of digital implant impressions in clinical studies: a systematic review","volume":"33","author":"A Schmidt","year":"2022","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-017-0383-4","article-title":"Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study","volume":"17","author":"M Imburgia","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Oral Health"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"844","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2021.08.018","article-title":"Techniques to improve the accuracy of complete arch implant intraoral digital scans: a systematic review","volume":"129","author":"A Paratelli","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"749","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2020.09.008","article-title":"Influence of implant position on the accuracy of intraoral scanning in fully edentulous arches: a systematic review","volume":"126","author":"A L Carneiro Pereira","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"issue":"10","key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1318","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12982","article-title":"Time efficiency, difficulty, and operator's preference comparing digital and conventional implant impressions: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"28","author":"T Joda","year":"2017","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1186\/s40729-021-00352-9","article-title":"Trueness and precision of digital implant impressions by intraoral scanners: a literature review","volume":"7","author":"M Sanda","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int J Implant Dent"},{"issue":"07","key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3895","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-023-05011-4","article-title":"Predictability of intraoral scanner error for full-arch implant-supported rehabilitation","volume":"27","author":"F Zingari","year":"2023","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1009","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2021.01.032","article-title":"Comparative study of the accuracy of an implant intraoral scanner and that of a conventional intraoral scanner for complete-arch fixed dental prostheses","volume":"128","author":"A Sallorenzo","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.4047\/jap.2022.14.6.388","article-title":"Accuracy of 14 intraoral scanners for the All-on-4 treatment concept: a comparative in vitro study","volume":"14","author":"G Kaya","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Adv Prosthodont"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1017","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2021.01.016","article-title":"Accuracy of impressions for multiple implants: a comparative study of digital and conventional techniques","volume":"128","author":"M Lyu","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"issue":"11","key":"ref32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4176","DOI":"10.3390\/ma16114176","article-title":"Conventional and digital impressions for fabrication of complete implant-supported bars: a comparative in vitro study","volume":"16","author":"S NV Vieira","year":"2023","journal-title":"Materials (Basel)"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Dentistry"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/products\/ejournals\/pdf\/10.1055\/s-0045-1811961.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,6]],"date-time":"2026-07-06T22:43:27Z","timestamp":1783377807000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/DOI\/DOI?10.1055\/s-0045-1811961"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,9]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"03","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,6]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,7]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0045-1811961","archive":["Portico","CLOCKSS"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1305-7456","1305-7464"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1305-7456","type":"print"},{"value":"1305-7464","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,9]]}}}