{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T19:43:28Z","timestamp":1740167008702,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":65,"publisher":"Georg Thieme Verlag KG","issue":"02","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,24]],"date-time":"2021-05-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1621814400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Journal of Coloproctology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Rectal cancer is an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The most effective and curative treatment is surgery, and the standard procedure is total mesorectal excision, initially performed by open surgery and posteriorly by minimally invasive techniques. Robotic surgery is an emerging technology that is expected to overcome the limitations of the laparoscopic approach. It has several advantages, including a stable camera platform with high definition three-dimensional image, flexible instruments with seven degrees of freedom, a third arm for fixed retraction, fine motion scaling, excellent dexterity, ambidextrous capability, elimination of physiological tremors and better ergonomics, that facilitate a steady and precise tissue dissection. The main technical disadvantages are the loss of tactile sensation and tensile feedback and the complex installation process. The aim of the present study is to review the importance and benefits of robotic surgery in rectal cancer, particularly in comparison with the laparoscopic approach. Intraoperative estimated blood loss, short and long-term outcomes as well as pathological outcomes were similar between robotic and laparoscopic surgery. The operative time is usually longer in robotic surgery and the high costs are still its major drawback. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer demonstrated lower conversion rate to open surgery and benefits in urinary and sexual functions and has been established as a safe and feasible technique.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0041-1724055","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,24]],"date-time":"2021-05-24T22:36:02Z","timestamp":1621895762000},"page":"198-205","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Robotic Surgery in Rectal Cancer"],"prefix":"10.1055","volume":"41","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6624-5073","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sara Margarida Leonardo de","family":"Oliveira","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Medicina, Porto, Portugal"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6974-5751","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Laura Elisabete Ribeiro","family":"Barbosa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Medicina, Porto, Portugal"},{"name":"Hospital de S\u00e3o Jo\u00e3o, Servi\u00e7o de Cirurgia Geral, Porto, Portugal"}]}],"member":"194","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,24]]},"reference":[{"issue":"10","key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.1800691019","article-title":"The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence?","volume":"69","author":"R J Heald","year":"1982","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1097\/DCR.0000000000001223","article-title":"Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery for the excision of rectal neoplasia: Clinical experience with 58 consecutive patients","volume":"62","author":"M J Tomassi","year":"2019","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1007\/s13304-019-00630-7","article-title":"Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME): current status and future perspectives","volume":"71","author":"A Vignali","year":"2019","journal-title":"Updates Surg"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1110","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002862","article-title":"A multicenter matched comparison of transanal and robotic total mesorectal excision for mid and low-rectal adenocarcinoma","volume":"270","author":"L Lee","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.4251\/wjgo.v10.i11.449","article-title":"Robotic total meso-rectal excision for rectal cancer: A systematic review following the publication of the ROLARR trial","volume":"10","author":"K Jones","year":"2018","journal-title":"World J Gastrointest Oncol"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1016\/j.soc.2018.11.005","article-title":"Minimally invasive surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer","volume":"28","author":"K O Wells","year":"2019","journal-title":"Surg Oncol Clin N Am"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"364","DOI":"10.1111\/ases.12427","article-title":"Robotic surgery for rectal cancer","volume":"10","author":"H Nozawa","year":"2017","journal-title":"Asian J Endosc Surg"},{"issue":"29","key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e7585","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000007585","article-title":"The safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic TME in patients with rectal cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review","volume":"96","author":"X Li","year":"2017","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"issue":"07","key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2798","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-016-5289-8","article-title":"Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer","volume":"31","author":"W L Law","year":"2017","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0000000000000246","article-title":"Evaluation of sexual and urinary function after implementation of robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: A single-center study","volume":"26","author":"A FT Schmiegelow","year":"2016","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"633","DOI":"10.1007\/s10147-015-0854-z","article-title":"Recent advances in robotic surgery for rectal cancer","volume":"20","author":"S Ishihara","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Clin Oncol"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amsu.2019.07.004","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of current approaches in rectal surgery","volume":"45","author":"K N Alsowaina","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ann Med Surg (Lond)"},{"issue":"07","key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"556","DOI":"10.1007\/s00595-019-1763-y","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: an overview of systematic reviews with quality assessment of current evidence","volume":"49","author":"N Hoshino","year":"2019","journal-title":"Surg Today"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"843","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-016-2544-3","article-title":"Clinical and oncologic outcomes of totally robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: initial results in a center for minimally invasive surgery","volume":"31","author":"C N Kim","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2018.11.010","article-title":"Systematic review analysis of robotic and transanal approaches in TME surgery- A systematic review of the current literature in regard to challenges in rectal cancer surgery","volume":"45","author":"J K Grass","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asjsur.2018.11.007","article-title":"Effects of laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: An update systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"42","author":"Y J Huang","year":"2019","journal-title":"Asian J Surg"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref19","first-page":"611","article-title":"Meta-analysis of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer","volume":"32","author":"H Ohtani","year":"2018","journal-title":"In Vivo"},{"issue":"12","key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1092","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.13783","article-title":"Robotic vs laparoscopic rectal surgery in high-risk patients","volume":"19","author":"J Ahmed","year":"2017","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"issue":"10","key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4085","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-017-5455-7","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients","volume":"31","author":"A Valverde","year":"2017","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1002\/jso.24867","article-title":"Comparison of outcome and cost among open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgical treatments for rectal cancer: A propensity score matched analysis of nationwide inpatient sample data","volume":"117","author":"S T Chen","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1080\/13645706.2018.1498358","article-title":"Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"28","author":"X Y Sun","year":"2019","journal-title":"Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1965","DOI":"10.1002\/rcs.1965","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision: A propensity case-matched analysis","volume":"15","author":"P Sugoor","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Med Robot"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1034","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002523","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"267","author":"F P Prete","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1177\/1553350618765868","article-title":"Single-docking full robotic surgery for rectal cancer: A single-center experience","volume":"25","author":"S Alfieri","year":"2018","journal-title":"Surg Innov"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1007\/s13304-019-00655-y","article-title":"TME for rectal cancer: consecutive 70 patients treated with laparoscopic and robotic technique-cumulative experience in a single centre","volume":"71","author":"J L M\u00e9gevand","year":"2019","journal-title":"Updates Surg"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1177\/1553350619839853","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal surgery for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 7 randomized controlled trials","volume":"26","author":"L Li","year":"2019","journal-title":"Surg Innov"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1007\/s13304-019-00642-3","article-title":"Open versus minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center cohort study on 237 consecutive patients","volume":"71","author":"G Quero","year":"2019","journal-title":"Updates Surg"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-016-3335-4","article-title":"Robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: A series of 392 cases and mid-term outcomes from a single center in china","volume":"21","author":"B Tang","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"issue":"12","key":"ref31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1135","DOI":"10.1093\/jjco\/hyx141","article-title":"Surgical outcomes of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery using the da Vinci Surgical System: a multi-center pilot Phase II study","volume":"47","author":"S Tsukamoto","year":"2017","journal-title":"Jpn J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"406","DOI":"10.1002\/ags3.12202","article-title":"Robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: Current state and future perspective","volume":"2","author":"T Matsuyama","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ann Gastroenterol Surg"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1981","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-018-6502-8","article-title":"Laparoscopic transanal minimally invasive surgery (L-TAMIS) versus robotic TAMIS (R-TAMIS): short-term outcomes and costs of a comparative study","volume":"33","author":"S G Lee","year":"2019","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"290","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asjsur.2019.04.007","article-title":"Surgical outcomes of robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery for selected rectal neoplasms: A single-hospital experience","volume":"43","author":"Y J Huang","year":"2020","journal-title":"Asian J Surg"},{"issue":"08","key":"ref35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1047","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-018-3056-0","article-title":"The short-term outcomes of robotic sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: comparison with open and laparoscopic surgery using a propensity score analysis","volume":"33","author":"S Ishihara","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"issue":"11","key":"ref36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4562","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-018-6209-x","article-title":"Does robotic rectal cancer surgery improve the results of experienced laparoscopic surgeons? An observational single institution study comparing 168 robotic assisted with 184 laparoscopic rectal resections","volume":"32","author":"R MPH Crolla","year":"2018","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"13","key":"ref37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3602","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v22.i13.3602","article-title":"Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery","volume":"22","author":"F Feroci","year":"2016","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"issue":"16","key":"ref38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1569","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2017.7219","article-title":"Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: The ROLARR randomized clinical trial","volume":"318","author":"D Jayne","year":"2017","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"10","key":"ref39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1423","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-017-2876-7","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a comparative study of clinical outcomes and costs","volume":"32","author":"B Ielpo","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"ref40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26981","DOI":"10.1038\/srep26981","article-title":"Robotic-assisted surgery versus open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer: the current evidence","volume":"6","author":"G Liao","year":"2016","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"516","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-014-2697-8","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of eight studies","volume":"19","author":"B Xiong","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"issue":"03","key":"ref42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0000000000000263","article-title":"A pooled analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer","volume":"26","author":"Y Wang","year":"2016","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"key":"ref43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1186\/s12957-016-0816-6","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis","volume":"14","author":"Y Sun","year":"2016","journal-title":"World J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"ref44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-34244-3_14","article-title":"Robotic rectal cancer surgery","volume":"168","author":"K Melstrom","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cancer Treat Res"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"427","DOI":"10.4143\/crt.2015.478","article-title":"Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: An update in 2015","volume":"48","author":"J M Kwak","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cancer Res Treat"},{"issue":"12","key":"ref46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3572","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-018-6738-5","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for sphincter-saving surgery: Results of a single-center series of 400 consecutive patients and perspectives","volume":"25","author":"P Rouanet","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e2015.00110","DOI":"10.4293\/JSLS.2015.00110","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic resection for mid and low rectal cancers","volume":"20","author":"A Bedirli","year":"2016","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"issue":"12","key":"ref48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1741","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-018-3145-0","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"33","author":"S H Lee","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.4174\/astr.2015.89.4.190","article-title":"Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"89","author":"S H Lee","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann Surg Treat Res"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2613","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-019-07032-1","article-title":"Comparing pathologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic Surgery in rectal cancer resection: a propensity adjusted analysis of 7616 patients","volume":"34","author":"M B Hopkins","year":"2020","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"456","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-013-3213-z","article-title":"Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries","volume":"28","author":"G I Lee","year":"2014","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1365","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-008-0184-6","article-title":"Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery","volume":"23","author":"R H van der Schatte Olivier","year":"2009","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"12","key":"ref53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3379","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-014-3604-9","article-title":"Ergonomic analysis of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic procedures","volume":"28","author":"A M Zihni","year":"2014","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.10.004","article-title":"Comparison of postural ergonomics between laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy: a pilot study","volume":"22","author":"M E Tarr","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1002\/rcs.1489","article-title":"Ergonomic assessment of the surgeon's physical workload during standard and robotic assisted laparoscopic procedures","volume":"9","author":"N Hubert","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int J Med Robot"},{"issue":"10","key":"ref56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1521","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-005-0855-5","article-title":"Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer","volume":"20","author":"A Pigazzi","year":"2006","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"02","key":"ref57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.14475","article-title":"Robotic vs laparoscopic rectal tumour surgery: a cohort study","volume":"21","author":"D Asklid","year":"2019","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"issue":"12","key":"ref58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2321","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-009-0927-2","article-title":"Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for patients having colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials","volume":"13","author":"C Eskicioglu","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"key":"ref59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1016\/j.suronc.2019.02.004","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection surgery: Short-term outcomes and complications: A retrospective comparative study","volume":"29","author":"T Bo","year":"2019","journal-title":"Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"414","DOI":"10.5301\/tj.5000533","article-title":"Open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery for rectal cancer: medium-term comparative outcomes from a multicenter study","volume":"102","author":"C Corbellini","year":"2016","journal-title":"Tumori"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e2027","DOI":"10.1002\/rcs.2027","article-title":"Comparison of pathological outcomes between robotic rectal cancer surgery and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis based on seven randomized controlled trials","volume":"15","author":"G Liao","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Med Robot"},{"issue":"04","key":"ref63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0000000000000552","article-title":"Totally robotic versus totally laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer","volume":"28","author":"E Esen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"808","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2016.03.002","article-title":"The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer","volume":"42","author":"J P de Jesus","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"06","key":"ref65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"983","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-019-03307-0","article-title":"Completeness of total mesorectum excision of laparoscopic versus robotic surgery: a review with a meta-analysis","volume":"34","author":"M Milone","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"O103","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.14051","article-title":"The impact of robotic surgery on quality of life, urinary and sexual function following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis with laparoscopic surgery","volume":"20","author":"H J Kim","year":"2018","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"issue":"01","key":"ref67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.1186\/s12957-018-1499-y","article-title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in male urogenital function preservation, a meta-analysis","volume":"16","author":"X Tang","year":"2018","journal-title":"World J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"05","key":"ref68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.12872","article-title":"Possible benefits of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery regarding urological and sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"17","author":"M Broholm","year":"2015","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"}],"container-title":["Journal of Coloproctology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/products\/ejournals\/pdf\/10.1055\/s-0041-1724055.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,4]],"date-time":"2023-11-04T03:33:36Z","timestamp":1699068816000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.thieme-connect.de\/DOI\/DOI?10.1055\/s-0041-1724055"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,24]]},"references-count":65,"journal-issue":{"issue":"02","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,30]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,6]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0041-1724055","archive":["Portico","CLOCKSS"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["2237-9363","2317-6423"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2237-9363"},{"type":"electronic","value":"2317-6423"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,24]]}}}