{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]],"date-time":"2026-09-10T03:18:28Z","timestamp":1789010308623,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,3,1]],"date-time":"2017-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1488326400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["cpdrjournal.com","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]},"DOI":"10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2016.05.001","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,13]],"date-time":"2016-05-13T03:46:42Z","timestamp":1463111202000},"page":"105-109","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":37,"title":["Breast Density Reporting Laws and Supplemental Screening\u2014A Survey of Referring Providers\u2019 Experiences and Understanding"],"prefix":"10.1067","volume":"46","author":[{"given":"Santo","family":"Maimone","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michelle D.","family":"McDonough","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stephanie L.","family":"Hines","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2016.05.001_bib1","series-title":"ACR BI-RADS\u00ae Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System","author":"D\u2019Orsi","year":"2013"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2016.05.001_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.13.11969","article-title":"Dense breasts: A review of reporting legislation and available supplemental screening options","volume":"203","author":"Ho","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2016.05.001_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa062790","article-title":"Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer","volume":"356","author":"Boyd","year":"2007","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2016.05.001_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"168","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008","article-title":"Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography","volume":"138","author":"Carney","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2016.05.001_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"302","DOI":"10.1148\/rg.352140106","article-title":"Mammographic breast density: Impact on breast cancer risk and implications for screening","volume":"35","author":"Freer","year":"2015","journal-title":"Radiographics"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2016.05.001_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1159","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034","article-title":"Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis","volume":"15","author":"McCormack","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2016.05.001_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1186\/bcr1829","article-title":"Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction","volume":"9","author":"Vachon","year":"2007","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2016.05.001_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"859","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rcl.2010.06.012","article-title":"The use of breast imaging to screen women at high risk for cancer","volume":"48","author":"Sickles","year":"2010","journal-title":"Radiol Clin North Am"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2016.05.001_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00005","article-title":"Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: A cohort study","volume":"155","author":"Kerlikowske","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2016.05.001_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2461070200","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: Exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST","volume":"246","author":"Pisano","year":"2008","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2016.05.001_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"632","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.12120184","article-title":"Breast density legislation and opportunities for patient-centered outcomes research","volume":"264","author":"Lee","year":"2012","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"23","key":"10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2016.05.001_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1801","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/90.23.1801","article-title":"Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System","volume":"90","author":"Kerlikowske","year":"1998","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"issue":"1019","key":"10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2016.05.001_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1465","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr\/21256379","article-title":"Inter- and intraradiologist variability in the BI-RADS assessment and breast density categories for screening mammograms","volume":"85","author":"Redondo","year":"2012","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2016.05.001_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1148\/rg.352140276","article-title":"Invited commentary: The breast density dilemma\u2014Challenges, lessons, and future directions","volume":"35","author":"Butler","year":"2015","journal-title":"Radiographics"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2016.05.001_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2012.06.002","article-title":"Should women be informed of breast density?","volume":"10","author":"Fajardo","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Am Coll Radiol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2016.05.001_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"673","DOI":"10.7326\/M14-1465","article-title":"Identifying women with dense breasts at high risk for interval cancer: A cohort study","volume":"162","author":"Kerlikowske","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2016.05.001_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"887","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.13131217","article-title":"The California breast density information group: A collaborative response to the issues of breast density, breast cancer risk, and breast density notification legislation","volume":"269","author":"Price","year":"2013","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2016.05.001_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.12120621","article-title":"Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: Initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41","volume":"265","author":"Hooley","year":"2012","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2016.05.001_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"517","DOI":"10.1111\/tbj.12003","article-title":"The connecticut experiment: The role of ultrasound in the screening of women with dense breasts","volume":"18","author":"Weigert","year":"2012","journal-title":"Breast J"}],"container-title":["Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0363018816300184?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0363018816300184?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,12]],"date-time":"2018-09-12T02:28:23Z","timestamp":1536719303000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0363018816300184"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S0363018816300184"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2016.05.001","relation":{},"ISSN":["0363-0188"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0363-0188","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Breast Density Reporting Laws and Supplemental Screening\u2014A Survey of Referring Providers\u2019 Experiences and Understanding","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2016.05.001","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}