{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T22:49:18Z","timestamp":1787870958440,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2001,3,1]],"date-time":"2001-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":983404800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2001,3]]},"DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2002,7,25]],"date-time":"2002-07-25T04:19:27Z","timestamp":1027570767000},"page":"611-619","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":42,"title":["Temporal changes in rates and reasons for medical induction of term labor, 1980-1996"],"prefix":"10.1067","volume":"184","author":[{"given":"Barbara P.","family":"Yawn","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Peter","family":"Wollan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kimberly","family":"McKeon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Charles S.","family":"Field","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"Suppl 11","key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Report of final natality statistics, 1995","volume":"45","author":"Ventura","year":"1997","journal-title":"Mon Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"628","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70265-6","article-title":"Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: a review of 7001 consecutive inductions","volume":"180","author":"Yeast","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"792","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12022.x","article-title":"Gestational age and induction of labor for prolonged pregnancy","volume":"104","author":"Gardosi","year":"1997","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1998.tb03065.x","article-title":"Induction of labor for post term pregnancy: an observational study","volume":"38","author":"Parry","year":"1998","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1005","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199604183341601","article-title":"Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term","volume":"334","author":"Hannah","year":"1996","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"3 Pt 1","key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"635","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70056-0","article-title":"International multicenter term PROM study: evaluation of predictors of neonatal infection in infants born to patients with premature rupture of membranes at term. Premature Rupture of the Membranes","volume":"179","author":"Seaward","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.1996.tb00455.x","article-title":"Postterm pregnancy: putting the merits of a policy of induction of labor into perspective","volume":"23","author":"Hannah","year":"1996","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-994404","article-title":"Influence of spontaneous or induced labor on delivering the macrosomic fetus","volume":"12","author":"Friesen","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(98)00115-X","article-title":"Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a case-control analysis of safety and efficacy","volume":"92","author":"Prysak","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"579","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(84)90752-X","article-title":"Hazards and benefits of elective induction of labor","volume":"148","author":"Smith","year":"1984","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1690","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(92)91558-R","article-title":"Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a retrospective study of complications and outcome","volume":"166","author":"Macer","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"633","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(96)00374-2","article-title":"Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: a meta-analysis","volume":"8","author":"Sanchez-Ramos","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00259-7","article-title":"Induction of labor in the nineties: conquering the unfavorable cervix","volume":"90","author":"Xenakis","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1520-6661(199703\/04)6:2<99::AID-MFM7>3.0.CO;2-K","article-title":"Labor induction with a prenatal diagnosis of fetal macrosomia","volume":"6","author":"Leaphart","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Med"},{"key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.4065\/71.3.266","article-title":"History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project","volume":"71","author":"Melton","year":"1996","journal-title":"Mayo Clin Proc"},{"key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib16","first-page":"1","article-title":"Induced births rise as moms take control","author":"Balu","year":"1999","journal-title":"The Wall Street Journal"},{"key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib17","series-title":"Diagnosis and management of postterm pregnancy","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"1989"},{"key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"716","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(94)70269-1","volume":"170","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Suppl 9","key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib19","first-page":"1174","article-title":"Induction of labor at term\u2014misoprostol, efficacy, economics and ethics [editorial]","volume":"86","author":"Howarth","year":"1996","journal-title":"S Afr Med J"},{"key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1080\/07399339409516105","article-title":"Induction of labor: an integrated review","volume":"15","author":"Bramadat","year":"1994","journal-title":"Health Care Women Int"},{"key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib21","first-page":"828","article-title":"Disruption of prior uterine incision following misoprostol for labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery","volume":"91","author":"Wing","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib22","series-title":"Induction of labor","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"1999"},{"key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib23","first-page":"S20","article-title":"The effect of a change in remuneration on obstetric intervention","volume":"182","author":"Bland","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1515\/jpme.1997.25.5.433","article-title":"Maternal satisfaction with management in labor and preference for mode of delivery","volume":"25","author":"Geary","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.1997.tb00593.x","article-title":"Women\u2019s evaluations of induction of labor versus expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. TermPROM Study Group","volume":"24","author":"Hodnett","year":"1997","journal-title":"Birth"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110292_bib26","first-page":"19","article-title":"Women\u2019s evaluation of the labor and delivery experience","volume":"11","author":"Mackey","year":"1998","journal-title":"Nurs Connect"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937801888657?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937801888657?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,9]],"date-time":"2019-05-09T12:51:36Z","timestamp":1557406296000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937801888657"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2001,3]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2001,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937801888657"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1067\/mob.2001.110292","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2001,3]]}}}