{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,2]],"date-time":"2026-05-02T17:09:21Z","timestamp":1777741761498,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":3,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,1,1]],"date-time":"2014-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1388534400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["i-Perception"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Sharing code is becoming increasingly important in the wake of Open Science. In this review I describe and compare two popular code-sharing utilities, GitHub and Open Science Framework (OSF). GitHub is a mature, industry-standard tool but lacks focus towards researchers. In comparison, OSF offers a one-stop solution for researchers but a lot of functionality is still under development. I conclude by listing alternative lesser-known tools for code and materials sharing.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1068\/i004ir","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,6]],"date-time":"2014-02-06T05:01:31Z","timestamp":1391662891000},"page":"75-78","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["i-Review: Sharing Code"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"5","author":[{"given":"Jonas","family":"Kubilius","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Laboratories of Biological and Experimental Psychology, KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102 bus 3714, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,1,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"bibr1-i004ir","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/1047840X.2012.692215"},{"key":"bibr2-i004ir","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1745691612459058"},{"key":"bibr3-i004ir","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Open Science Collaboration (2013). The Reproducibility Project: A model of large-scale collaboration for empirical research on reproducibility (3 January). doi:10.2139\/ssrn.2195999","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.2195999"}],"container-title":["i-Perception"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1068\/i004ir","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1068\/i004ir","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]],"date-time":"2026-04-29T11:30:14Z","timestamp":1777462214000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1068\/i004ir"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,1,1]]},"references-count":3,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,2]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1068\/i004ir"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1068\/i004ir","relation":{},"ISSN":["2041-6695","2041-6695"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2041-6695","type":"print"},{"value":"2041-6695","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,1,1]]}}}