{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,2]],"date-time":"2026-07-02T03:03:30Z","timestamp":1782961410907,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":63,"publisher":"CSIRO Publishing","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,29]],"date-time":"2025-08-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1756425600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":4981,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1071\/journalslicense"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,2,17]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The female condom remains the sole female-initiated method of dual protection against unintended pregnancy and sexually transmissible infections (STIs), including HIV. We reviewed published data on the effectiveness and acceptability of the female condom for protection against pregnancy and infection. Overall, use of the female condom is low and several barriers hinder the wider adoption of the use of the method. Research on effectiveness has focussed on pregnancy, STIs and biological markers of semen exposure. Although the data available suggest that female condoms (or a mixture of female and male condoms) may provide similar degrees of protection against pregnancy and STIs as do latex male condoms alone, this conclusion has not been demonstrated and thus comparative research is urgently needed.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1071\/sh11037","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,9]],"date-time":"2012-01-09T00:10:29Z","timestamp":1326067829000},"page":"18-26","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":53,"title":["A review of the effectiveness and acceptability of the female condom for dual protection"],"prefix":"10.1071","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"Maria F.","family":"Gallo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"ADivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA."},{"name":"CCorresponding author. Email: mgallo@cdc.gov"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maggie","family":"Kilbourne-Brook","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"BProgram for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH), Seattle, WA, USA."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Patricia S.","family":"Coffey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"BProgram for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH), Seattle, WA, USA."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"67","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025102617012162500_R1"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1016\/S1473-3099(09)70021-0","article-title":"Heterosexual risk of HIV-1 infection per sexual act: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.","volume":"9","author":"Boily","year":"2009","journal-title":"Lancet Infect Dis"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R3"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R4"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R5"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"316","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.07.022","article-title":"Female condom technology: new products and regulatory issues.","volume":"83","author":"Beksinska","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"465","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.07.020","article-title":"Comparative crossover study of the PATH Woman\u2019s Condom and the FC female condom.","volume":"78","author":"Schwartz","year":"2008","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"588","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2005.10.017","article-title":"Short-term acceptability of the PATH Woman\u2019s Condom among couples at three sites.","volume":"73","author":"Coffey","year":"2006","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2009.09.020","article-title":"A crossover comparison of two types of female condom.","volume":"108","author":"Hou","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1097\/00007435-199004000-00014","article-title":"Evaluation of the virus permeability of a new condom for women.","volume":"17","author":"Drew","year":"1990","journal-title":"Sex Transm Dis"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01890894","article-title":"Preliminary evaluation of Reality, a condom for women to wear.","volume":"5","author":"Leeper","year":"1989","journal-title":"Adv Contracept"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R12","first-page":"36","article-title":"Female condom (Femidom): a clinical study of its use-effectiveness and patient acceptability.","volume":"18","author":"Bounds","year":"1992","journal-title":"Br J Fam Plann"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1960","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.84.12.1960","article-title":"Contraceptive efficacy and acceptability of the female condom.","volume":"84","author":"Farr","year":"1994","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(98)00094-8","article-title":"Contraceptive efficacy of the Reality female condom.","volume":"58","author":"Trussell","year":"1998","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R15"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1097\/00007435-199305000-00003","article-title":"Prevention of vaginal trichomoniasis by compliant use of the female condom.","volume":"20","author":"Soper","year":"1993","journal-title":"Sex Transm Dis"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1097\/00007435-200305000-00010","article-title":"Use-effectiveness of the female versus male condom in preventing sexually transmitted disease in women.","volume":"30","author":"French","year":"2003","journal-title":"Sex Transm Dis"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1851","DOI":"10.1097\/00002030-199814000-00017","article-title":"Protection against sexually transmitted diseases by granting sex workers in Thailand the choice of using the male or female condom: results from a randomized controlled trial.","volume":"12","author":"Fontanet AL","year":"1998","journal-title":"AIDS"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1037","DOI":"10.1097\/00002030-200105250-00012","article-title":"Female condom introduction and sexually transmitted infection prevalence: results of a community intervention trial in Kenya.","volume":"15","author":"Feldblum","year":"2001","journal-title":"AIDS"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.1258\/0956462011923363","article-title":"Condom use during a community intervention trial in Kenya.","volume":"12","author":"Welsh","year":"2001","journal-title":"Int J STD AIDS"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1097\/00007435-199903000-00002","article-title":"Prospective study of barrier contraception for the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases: study design and general characteristics of the study group.","volume":"26","author":"Macaluso","year":"1999","journal-title":"Sex Transm Dis"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R22"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2006.10.003","article-title":"Standardized definitions of failure modes for female condoms.","volume":"75","author":"Beksinska","year":"2007","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R24","first-page":"101","article-title":"Preliminary comparison of the polyurethane female condom with the latex male condom in Kenya.","volume":"73","author":"Ruminjo","year":"1996","journal-title":"East Afr Med J"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwf212","article-title":"Efficacy of the female condom as a barrier to semen during intercourse.","volume":"157","author":"Macaluso","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2004.08.008","article-title":"Effectiveness of female and male condoms in preventing exposure to semen during vaginal intercourse: a randomized trial.","volume":"71","author":"Galv\u00e3o","year":"2005","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1097\/01.olq.0000148295.60514.0b","article-title":"Female condom and male condom failure among women at high risk of sexually transmitted diseases.","volume":"32","author":"Valappil","year":"2005","journal-title":"Sex Transm Dis"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2005.07.015","article-title":"Performance of the Reality polyurethane female condom and a synthetic latex prototype: a randomized crossover trial among South African women.","volume":"73","author":"Beksinska","year":"2006","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwm046","article-title":"Efficacy of the male latex condom and of the female polyurethane condom as barriers to semen during intercourse: a randomized clinical trial.","volume":"166","author":"Macaluso","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.08.002","article-title":"Three new female condoms: which do South-African women prefer?","volume":"83","author":"Joanis","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1097\/01.olq.0000258487.38309.b9","article-title":"Self-reported mechanical problems during condom use and semen exposure. Comparison of two randomized trials in the United States of America and Brazil.","volume":"34","author":"Chen","year":"2007","journal-title":"Sex Transm Dis"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2008.12.005","article-title":"Critical next steps for female condom research \u2013 report from a workshop.","volume":"79","author":"Mauck","year":"2009","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R33"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1363\/3013904","article-title":"The future of the female condom.","volume":"30","author":"Hoffman","year":"2004","journal-title":"Int Fam Plan Perspect"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R35","first-page":"\u00ad1","article-title":"Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States: 1982\u20132002.","volume":"350","author":"Mosher","year":"2004","journal-title":"Advance Data From Vital and Health Statistics CDC No"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R36","unstructured":"Lader D. Contraception and sexual health 2008\/2009. A report on research using the National Statistics. Opinions Survey produced on behalf of the NHS Information Centre for health and social care. Surrey: Office for National Statistics; 2009. Available online at: http:\/\/www.statistics.gov.uk\/downloads\/theme_health\/contra2008-9.pdf [verified November 2010]."},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1258\/095646207780658980","article-title":"Notes on the female condom: experiences in Brazil.","volume":"18","author":"Barbosa","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int J STD AIDS"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1016\/S0968-8080(03)02178-5","article-title":"Expanding safer sex options: introducing the female condom into national programmes.","volume":"11","author":"Warren","year":"2003","journal-title":"Reprod Health Matters"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R39"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R40","unstructured":"United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Deliver Project. Public Health Procurement Guide and Product Catalog 2010. Washington: USAID; 2010. Available online at: http:\/\/deliver.jsi.com\/dlvr_content\/resources\/allpubs\/guidelines\/CPTGuideCata2010.pdf [verified December 2010]."},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.1016\/S0968-8080(02)00084-8","article-title":"Considerations regarding re-use of the female condom: information update, 10 July 2002.","volume":"10","author":"World Health Organization","year":"2002","journal-title":"Reprod Health Matters"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2091","DOI":"10.1097\/01.aids.0000247567.57762.fb","article-title":"Country-wide distribution of the nitrile female condom (FC2) in Brazil and South Africa: a cost-effectiveness analysis.","volume":"20","author":"Dowdy","year":"2006","journal-title":"AIDS"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1016\/S0968-8080(10)35499-1","article-title":"The female condom: the international denial of a strong potential.","volume":"18","author":"Peters","year":"2010","journal-title":"Reprod Health Matters"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1016\/S1473-3099(08)70103-8","article-title":"The female condom: still an underused prevention tool [editorial].","volume":"8","year":"2008","journal-title":"Lancet Infect Dis"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.1093\/jurban\/78.4.571","article-title":"Female-initiated barrier methods for the prevention of STI\/HIV: where are we now? Where should we go?","volume":"78","author":"Latka","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Urban Health"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"775","DOI":"10.1080\/09540120903349102","article-title":"Prioritising prevention strategies for patients in antiretroviral treatment programmes in resource-limited settings.","volume":"22","author":"Spaar","year":"2010","journal-title":"AIDS Care"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(01)00286-4","article-title":"Predictors of difficulty inserting the female condom.","volume":"65","author":"Artz","year":"2002","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1016\/S0277-9536(00)00162-3","article-title":"Female control of sexuality: illusion or reality? Use of vaginal products in south west Uganda.","volume":"52","author":"Green","year":"2001","journal-title":"Soc Sci Med"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"783","DOI":"10.1016\/S0277-9536(00)00185-4","article-title":"\u201cIt\u2019s some kind of women\u2019s empowerment\u201d: the ambiguity of the female condom as a marker of female empowerment.","volume":"52","author":"Kaler","year":"2001","journal-title":"Soc Sci Med"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1377","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.90.9.1377","article-title":"The female condom: tool for women\u2019s empowerment.","volume":"90","author":"Gollub","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1521\/aeap.2008.20.2.91","article-title":"Women in the time of AIDS: barriers, bargains, and benefits.","volume":"20","author":"Mantell","year":"2008","journal-title":"AIDS Educ Prev"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S67","DOI":"10.1007\/s10461-006-9139-x","article-title":"Long-term female condom use among vulnerable populations in Brazil.","volume":"10","author":"Telles Dias","year":"2006","journal-title":"AIDS Behav"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"366","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2005.05.014","article-title":"Comparative acceptability study of the Reality female condom and the version 4 of modified Reddy female condom in India.","volume":"72","author":"Smita","year":"2005","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1016\/0968-8080(95)90084-5","article-title":"Acceptability of the female condom in Zimbabwe: positive but male-centred responses.","volume":"3","author":"Ray","year":"1995","journal-title":"Reprod Health Matters"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1097\/00007435-200301000-00018","article-title":"Patterns and predictors of female condom use among ethnically diverse women attending family planning clinics.","volume":"30","author":"Choi","year":"2003","journal-title":"Sex Transm Dis"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2028","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(06)69810-3","article-title":"Promoting protection and pleasure: amplifying the effectiveness of barriers against sexually transmitted infections and pregnancy.","volume":"368","author":"Philpott","year":"2006","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1080\/136910500300804","article-title":"Men\u2019s attitudes to condoms and female controlled means of protection against HIV and STDs in south-western Uganda.","volume":"2","author":"Pool","year":"2000","journal-title":"Cult Health Sex"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1521\/aeap.13.4.291.21430","article-title":"Awareness and use of untested barrier methods by HIV-seropositive gay and bisexual men.","volume":"13","author":"Wolitski","year":"2001","journal-title":"AIDS Educ Prev"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R59","first-page":"65","article-title":"Experiences of 100 men who have sex with men using the Reality condom for anal sex.","volume":"11","author":"Gibson","year":"1999","journal-title":"AIDS Educ Prev"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1739","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.89.11.1739","article-title":"Use of Reality \u201cfemale condoms\u201d for anal sex by US men who have sex with men.","volume":"89","author":"Gross","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1185","DOI":"10.1080\/09540120902730005","article-title":"Anal use of the female condom: does uncertainty justify provider inaction?","volume":"21","author":"Mantell","year":"2009","journal-title":"AIDS Care"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"727","DOI":"10.1097\/00002030-200303280-00011","article-title":"Safety and acceptability of the Reality condom for anal sex among men who have sex with men.","volume":"17","author":"Renzi","year":"2003","journal-title":"AIDS"},{"key":"2025102617012162500_R63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"985","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2008.141200","article-title":"Adding the female condom to the public health agenda on prevention of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections among men and women during anal intercourse.","volume":"99","author":"Kelvin","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"}],"container-title":["Sexual Health"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/connectsci.au\/sh\/article-pdf\/9\/1\/18\/1253866\/sh11037.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/connectsci.au\/sh\/article-pdf\/9\/1\/18\/1253866\/sh11037.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,26]],"date-time":"2025-10-26T21:01:31Z","timestamp":1761512491000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/connectsci.au\/sh\/article\/9\/1\/18\/184732\/A-review-of-the-effectiveness-and-acceptability-of"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,9]]},"references-count":63,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,2,17]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1071\/sh11037","relation":{},"ISSN":["1448-5028","1449-8987"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1448-5028","type":"print"},{"value":"1449-8987","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,9]]}}}