{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,22]],"date-time":"2026-07-22T17:16:31Z","timestamp":1784740591950,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,12,31]],"date-time":"2010-12-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1293753600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":1340,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p><jats:italic>Objective.<\/jats:italic> To assess the risk of uterine rupture of the scarred uterus according to mode of delivery in subsequent births recorded as spontaneous labour, labour induced by oxytocin, labour after ripening with prostaglandin E2, and planned cesarean section. <jats:italic>Methods.<\/jats:italic> Retrospective study of 2,128 births with a low transversal scar after a previous cesarean section. The study population was realised in a level III university hospital from 1995 to 2003. The association between mode of delivery and uterine rupture was studied in a multivariate logistic regression model, and adjusted for specific antenatal confounding factors. <jats:italic>Results.<\/jats:italic> Over 9 years, we collected 22 cases (1%), including 11 asymptomatic ruptures in a population of 2,128 scarred uteri out of 28,248 deliveries. Uterine rupture occurred at a rate of 0.3 per 100 among women with repeated cesarean delivery without labour, 1 per 100 among women with spontaneous onset of labour, 1.4 per 100 among women with oxytocin\u2010induced labour, and 2.2 per 100 among women with prostaglandin cervical ripening. Compared to women with a planned cesarean section, women with spontaneous onset of labour were more likely to have uterine rupture (OR: 4.0; 95% CI: 0.8\u201342.0). A greater relative risk was observed among women with oxytocin\u2010induced labour (OR: 4.3; 95% CI: 0.3\u201360.0), and particularly those with prostaglandin\u2010induced labour (OR: 8.7; 95% CI: 1.5\u201397.3, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.01). <jats:italic>Conclusion.<\/jats:italic> In women with a scarred uterus, prostaglandin E2 induction of labour is a risk factor for uterine rupture. The practice of a systematic cesarean section in cases with Bishop score &lt;3, appropriate induction procedure, and rigorous monitoring of the labour, could make for a safer delivery.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701257141","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,5,24]],"date-time":"2007-05-24T17:52:08Z","timestamp":1180029128000},"page":"572-578","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"title":["Rupture of the scarred uterus"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"86","author":[{"given":"E.","family":"GROSSETTI","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"D.","family":"VARDON","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"CREVEUIL","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"HERLICOVIEZ","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"DREYFUS","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2010,12,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMe048277"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_2","first-page":"1","article-title":"Conservatism in obstetrics","volume":"104","author":"Cragin EB","year":"1916","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200107053450101"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"679","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200204000-00038","article-title":"Committee opinion. Induction of labor for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery","volume":"99","author":"ACOG","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_2","first-page":"836","article-title":"L'exploration syst\u00e9matique par une r\u00e9vision ut\u00e9rine de la cicatrice d'une c\u00e9sarienne segmentaire ant\u00e9rieure lors de la r\u00e9ussite d'une \u00e9preuve ut\u00e9rine est\u2010elle justifi\u00e9e?","volume":"23","author":"Vendittelli F","year":"1994","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_2","first-page":"253","article-title":"Ut\u00e9rus cicatriciel: la r\u00e9vision syst\u00e9matique de la cicatrice de c\u00e9sarienne apr\u00e8s un accouchement par voie vaginale est\u2010elle toujours utile? [Scarred uterus: is routine exploration of the cesarean scar after vaginal birth always necessary?] (in French with English abstract)","volume":"28","author":"Perrotin F","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199011000-00004"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199406000-00005"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199406000-00006"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199609053351001"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70317-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.109037"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_2","first-page":"709","article-title":"Oxytocin during labor after previous cesarean section: results of a multicenter study","volume":"70","author":"Flamm BL","year":"1987","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(88)90224-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000134784.09455.21"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.109048"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(83)90746-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199912000-00015"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90290-X"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(87)80252-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_22_2","first-page":"380","article-title":"Outcome of trial of labor in patients with a single previous low transverse cesarean section for dystocia","volume":"71","author":"Duff P","year":"1988","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.115278"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(03)00355-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_25_2","first-page":"130","article-title":"Increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes with induction of labor in women with a history of previous cesarean","volume":"182","author":"Bennett KA","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.329.7456.19"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200009000-00011"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00287.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.aje.a116834"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_30_2","first-page":"245","volume":"49","author":"Use of hospital discharge data to monitor uterine rupture","year":"2000","journal-title":"Morb Mortal Wkly Rep"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01443619867047"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610410001660751"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.02.019"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000115508.75370.23"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0368-2315(05)82672-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_36_2","first-page":"413","article-title":"Dinoprostone: slow release vaginal insert and intracervical gel for the induction of labor with unripe cervix","volume":"56","author":"Grignaffini A","year":"2004","journal-title":"Minerva Ginecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0952-8180(03)00036-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_38_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70319-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.110293"}],"container-title":["Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1080%2F00016340701257141","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1080\/00016340701257141","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,11]],"date-time":"2023-10-11T13:19:43Z","timestamp":1697030383000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1080\/00016340701257141"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,5]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1080\/00016340701257141"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00016340701257141","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-6349","1600-0412"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0001-6349","type":"print"},{"value":"1600-0412","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2010-12-31","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}