{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,4]],"date-time":"2026-01-04T02:35:31Z","timestamp":1767494131936},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,12,31]],"date-time":"2010-12-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1293753600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":1217,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p><jats:italic>Background.<\/jats:italic> To explore non\u2010clinical maternal and institutional factors associated with the decision for planned cesarean in cases of breech presentation at term in France, where planned vaginal delivery are recommended by the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF) when conditions are optimal. <jats:italic>Methods.<\/jats:italic> The analysis included 6,080 women with a live fetus in breech presentation at term, from the PREMODA prospective survey, in 138 French maternity units between 1 June 2001 and 31 May 2002. Women with previous cesarean sections were excluded. The analysis to identify risk factors for planned cesarean used a multilevel logistic model. <jats:italic>Results.<\/jats:italic> The planned cesarean rate was 63.5%. The maternal factors most strongly associated with a decision for planned cesarean were parity (adjusted OR: 2.56 (2.29\u20132.88)) and maternal age \u226535 years (ORa: 1.38 (1.18\u20131.61)). No association was found between institutional factors, such as maternity size and level of care, although a centre effect was documented (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>&lt;0.001). <jats:italic>Conclusion.<\/jats:italic> The variation in planned cesarean rates between maternity units was not associated with their structural characteristics, but was related to a characteristic specific to each centre, and, thus, suggests that despite the current guidelines in France, obstetricians have diverse opinions about the best mode of delivery for breech presentations.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701505242","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,8,22]],"date-time":"2007-08-22T08:16:25Z","timestamp":1187770585000},"page":"1071-1078","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Non\u2010clinical determinants of planned cesarean delivery in cases of term breech presentation in France"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"86","author":[{"given":"M.","family":"CARAYOL","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J.","family":"ZEITLIN","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"H.","family":"ROMAN","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"LE RAY","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"G.","family":"BREART","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"F.","family":"GOFFINET","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"name":"FOR THE PREMODA STUDY GROUP","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"CARAYOL","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J.","family":"ZEITLIN","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"H.","family":"ROMAN","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"LE RAY","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"G.","family":"BREART","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"F.","family":"GOFFINET","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"name":"FOR THE PREMODA STUDY GROUP","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2010,12,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_2","unstructured":"CNGOF.Recommandation pour la pratique clinique: la c\u00e9sarienne.J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris).2000."},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_2_6_4_2","first-page":"191","article-title":"A propos du d\u00e9bat sur le si\u00e8ge. Voie d'accouchement en cas de pr\u00e9sentation du si\u00e8ge: la position du Coll\u00e8ge National des Gyn\u00e9cologues et Obst\u00e9triciens Fran\u00e7ais (CNGOF)","volume":"30","author":"Carbonne B","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.08.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.10.001"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2005.00248.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2005.00845.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2005-871530"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.817"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_2","first-page":"43","article-title":"[Perinatal care: the government plan 1995\u20132000]","volume":"156","year":"1994","journal-title":"Soins Gynecol Obstet Pueric Pediatr"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_2","unstructured":"Rabe\u2010Hesketh S Skrondal A Pickles A. Gllamm manual. U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series ed;2004."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_2","unstructured":"Stata software version 8 (Stata Corporation College Station TX) [program]."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-999696"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1991.tb10365.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09349.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2003.09.017"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_6_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1991.03460010059031","article-title":"The impact of nonclinical factors on repeat cesarean section","volume":"265","author":"Stafford RS","year":"1991","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2001.00009.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(00)01151-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(90)90002-I"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Carayol M Blondel B Zeitlin J Breart G Goffinet F.Changes in the rates of caesarean delivery before labour for breech presentation at term in France: 1972\u20132003.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.2006.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.017"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2003.02052.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2005.00534.x"}],"container-title":["Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1080%2F00016340701505242","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1080\/00016340701505242","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,26]],"date-time":"2023-09-26T22:17:54Z","timestamp":1695766674000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1080\/00016340701505242"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,9]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1080\/00016340701505242"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00016340701505242","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-6349","1600-0412"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0001-6349"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1600-0412"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2010-12-31","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}