{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,14]],"date-time":"2026-01-14T14:15:08Z","timestamp":1768400108405,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":12,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,12,31]],"date-time":"2010-12-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1293753600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":456,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Maternal and fetal morbidity of two different methods of delivering the baby during cesarean section performed in advanced labor when the fetal head is deeply engaged was assessed retrospectively, i.e. delivering as \u2018cephalic\u2019 with or without assistance to push up the fetal head from the vagina (head first or push method) and \u2018reverse breech extraction\u2019 (feet first or pull method). Records of 182 women with a single fetus in cephalic presentation, who had undergone cesarean section at cervical dilatation at \u22657 cm, with the vertex at or below zero station, were reviewed. Extension of the uterine incision occurred in significantly more women during \u2018cephalic\u2019 delivery as compared to \u2018reverse breech extraction\u2019 (22.8% versus 2.2%; <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.001). Use of \u2018reverse breech extraction\u2019 is an attractive and safe alternative to the standard methods for intra\u2010operative disengagement of a deeply impacted fetal head in order to reduce maternal and fetal morbidity.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340903214932","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,9,21]],"date-time":"2009-09-21T21:37:29Z","timestamp":1253569049000},"page":"1163-1166","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":42,"title":["Disengagement of the deeply engaged fetal head during cesarean section in advanced labor: Conventional method versus reverse breech extraction"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"88","author":[{"given":"SEEMA","family":"CHOPRA","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"RASHMI","family":"BAGGA","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"ANISH","family":"KEEPANASSERIL","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"VANITA","family":"JAIN","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"JASVINDER","family":"KALRA","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"VANITA","family":"SURI","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2010,12,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_2","first-page":"85","volume-title":"Recent advances in Obstetrics and Gynecology","author":"Murphy DJ","year":"2003"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2004.152"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kafali H.Cesarean breech extraction for impacted fetal head in deep pelvis after a prolonged obstructed labour: a cesarean technique variation.Internet J Gynaecol.2003;2\u20135.","DOI":"10.5580\/1f1"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_2","first-page":"244","article-title":"Evaluation of Patwardhan's technic \u2013 a four year study in a rural teaching hospital","volume":"55","author":"Mukhopadhyay P","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol Ind."},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(96)02817-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1999.tb03147.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(84)90551-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_2","first-page":"187","article-title":"Caesarean section in a wedged head","volume":"57","author":"Khosla AH","year":"2003","journal-title":"Indian J Med Sci"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.09.014"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_2","first-page":"234","article-title":"Bimanual delivery of the fetal head at caesarean section","volume":"59","author":"Lippert TH","year":"1983","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.08.037"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610220141290"}],"container-title":["Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1080%2F00016340903214932","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1080\/00016340903214932","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,11]],"date-time":"2023-10-11T20:48:01Z","timestamp":1697057281000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1080\/00016340903214932"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2009,10]]},"references-count":12,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1080\/00016340903214932"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00016340903214932","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-6349","1600-0412"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0001-6349","type":"print"},{"value":"1600-0412","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2009,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2010-12-31","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}