{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,28]],"date-time":"2025-05-28T04:22:17Z","timestamp":1748406137736,"version":"3.41.0"},"reference-count":60,"publisher":"Informa UK Limited","issue":"1-2","content-domain":{"domain":["www.tandfonline.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,3,3]]},"DOI":"10.1080\/0952813x.2015.1024490","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,5,19]],"date-time":"2015-05-19T17:17:21Z","timestamp":1432055841000},"page":"275-294","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/tandf_crossmark_01","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Formalisation and logical properties of the maximal ideal recursive semantics for weighted defeasible logic programming"],"prefix":"10.1080","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"Teresa","family":"Alsinet","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ram\u00f3n","family":"B\u00e9jar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Llu\u00eds","family":"Godo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Francesc","family":"Guitart","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"301","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,5,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"CIT0001","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-40381-1_6"},{"key":"CIT0002","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exu008"},{"key":"CIT0003","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2007.07.004"},{"key":"CIT0004","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fss.2007.12.013"},{"key":"CIT0005","unstructured":"Amgoud, L. (2012). Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems. In L.\u00a0Godo & H.\u00a0Prade (Eds.), Working Papers of the ECAI-2012 Workshop on Weighted Logics for Artificial Intelligence (WL4AI) (pp. 59\u201367). France: Montpellier."},{"key":"CIT0006","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-04388-8_3"},{"key":"CIT0007","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-15951-0_10"},{"key":"CIT0008","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1021603608656"},{"key":"CIT0009","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1014490210693"},{"key":"CIT0010","unstructured":"Amgoud, L. & Vesic, S. (2009). Repairing preference-based argumentation frameworks. In C.\u00a0Boutilier (Ed.), IJCAI (pp. 665\u2013670)"},{"key":"CIT0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amgoud, L. & Vesic, S. (2010). Generalizing stable semantics by preferences. In P.\u00a0Baroni, F.\u00a0Cerutti, M.\u00a0Giacomin, & G. R.\u00a0Simari (Eds.), COMMA (pp. 39\u201350). IOS.","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-60750-619-5-39"},{"key":"CIT0012","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-15951-0_11"},{"key":"CIT0013","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10472-011-9271-9"},{"key":"CIT0014","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-006-9001-5"},{"key":"CIT0015","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/13.3.429"},{"key":"CIT0017","unstructured":"Benferhat, S., Cayrol, C., Dubois, D., Lang, J. & Prade, H. (1993). Inconsistency management and prioritized syntax-based entailment. In R.\u00a0Bajcsy (Ed.), IJCAI (pp. 640\u2013647). Morgan Kaufmann."},{"key":"CIT0018","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-1-4832-1451-1.50054-8"},{"key":"CIT0019","unstructured":"Benferhat, S., Dubois, D. & Prade, H. (1995). How to infer from inconsisent beliefs without revising? In IJCAI (pp. 1449\u20131457). Morgan Kaufmann."},{"key":"CIT0020","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/ISMVL.1996.508357"},{"key":"CIT0021","unstructured":"Benferhat, S., Dubois, D. & Prade, H. (1998). Some syntactic approaches to the handling of inconsistent knowledge bases: A comparative study. Part ii: The prioritized case. In E.\u00a0Orlowska (Ed.), Logic at work (Vol. 24, pp. 473\u2013511). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag."},{"key":"CIT0022","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/9780262026437.001.0001"},{"key":"CIT0023","unstructured":"Brewka, G. (1989). Preferred subtheories: An extended logical framework for default reasoning. In IJCAI (pp. 1043\u20131048)"},{"key":"CIT0024","unstructured":"Brewka, G. & Woltran, S. (2010). Abstract dialectical frameworks. In F.\u00a0Lin, U.\u00a0Sattler, & M.\u00a0Truszczynski (Eds.), KR (pp. 1043\u20131048). AAAI."},{"key":"CIT0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cabrio, E. & Villata, S. (2012). Natural language arguments: A combined approach. In L.\u00a0De Raedt, C.\u00a0Bessi\u00e8re, D.\u00a0Dubois, P.\u00a0Doherty, P.\u00a0Frasconi, F.\u00a0Heintz, & P. J. F.\u00a0Lucas (Eds.), ECAI (pp. 205\u2013210). IOS.","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-61499-098-7-205"},{"key":"CIT0026","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.02.003"},{"key":"CIT0027","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/MIS.2009.104"},{"key":"CIT0028","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/371578.371581"},{"key":"CIT0029","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X"},{"key":"CIT0030","unstructured":"Dung, P. M., Mancarella, P. & Toni, F. (2006). A dialectic procedure for sceptical, assumption-based argumentation. In Paul E.\u00a0Dunne & T. J. M.\u00a0Bench-Capon (Eds.), COMMA (pp. 145\u2013156). IOS."},{"key":"CIT0031","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.05.003"},{"key":"CIT0032","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2009.09.001"},{"key":"CIT0033","unstructured":"Dvor\u00e1k, W., Dunne, P. E. & Woltran, S. (2011). Parametric properties of ideal semantics. In T.\u00a0Walsh (Ed.), IJCAI (pp. 851\u2013856). IJCAI\/AAAI."},{"key":"CIT0034","unstructured":"E\u00e9n, N. & S\u00f6rensson, N. (2003). An extensible sat-solver. In E.\u00a0Giunchiglia & A.\u00a0Tacchella (Eds.), SAT. Vol. 2919 ofLNCS(pp. 502\u2013518). Springer."},{"key":"CIT0036","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2010.486479"},{"key":"CIT0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Egly, U., Gaggl, S. A. & Woltran, S. (2008). ASPARTIX: Implementing argumentation frameworks using answer-set programming. In M.\u00a0Garcia de la Banda & E.\u00a0Pontelli (Eds.), ICLP (pp. 734\u2013738). Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-89982-2_67"},{"key":"CIT0037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ellmauthaler, S. & Strass, H. (2014). The DIAMOND system for computing with abstract dialectical frameworks. In S.\u00a0Parsons, N.\u00a0Oren, C.\u00a0Reed, & F.\u00a0Cerutti (Eds.), COMMA (pp. 233\u2013240). IOS.","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-61499-436-7-233"},{"key":"CIT0038","unstructured":"Fazzinga, B., Flesca, S. & Parisi, F. (2013). On the complexity of probabilistic abstract argumentation. In F.\u00a0Rossi (Ed.), IJCAI. IJCAI\/AAAI."},{"key":"CIT0039","unstructured":"Gaertner, D. & Toni, F. (2008). Hybrid argumentation and its properties. In P.\u00a0Besnard, S.\u00a0Doutre, & A.\u00a0Hunter (Eds.), COMMA (pp. 183\u2013195). IOS."},{"key":"CIT0041","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_8"},{"key":"CIT0040","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-76719-0_16"},{"key":"CIT0042","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S1471068403001674"},{"key":"CIT0043","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.3233\/AIC-2011-0497","volume":"24","author":"Gebser M.","year":"2011","journal-title":"AI Communications"},{"key":"CIT0044","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/14.5.675"},{"key":"CIT0045","unstructured":"Grosse, K., Ches\u00f1evar, C. I. & Maguitman, A. G. (2012). An argument-based approach to mining opinions from twitter. In S.\u00a0Ossowski, F.\u00a0Toni, & G. A.\u00a0Vouros (Eds.), AT (pp. 408\u2013422). CEUR-WS.org."},{"key":"CIT0046","unstructured":"Hansson, S. O. (2013). Alternative semantics for deontic logic. In D.\u00a0Gabbay, J.\u00a0Horty, X.\u00a0Parent, R.\u00a0van der Meyden, & L.\u00a0van der Torre (Eds.), Handbook of deontic logic and normative systems. London: College Publications."},{"key":"CIT0047","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10462-012-9389-0"},{"key":"CIT0048","unstructured":"Kaci, S. (2010). Refined preference-based argumentation frameworks. In P.\u00a0Baroni, F.\u00a0Cerutti, M.\u00a0Giacomin, & G. R.\u00a0Simari (Eds.), COMMA (pp. 299\u2013310). IOS."},{"key":"CIT0049","unstructured":"Nielsen, S. H. & Parsons, S. (2006). A generalization of Dung's abstract framework for argumentation: Arguing with sets of attacking arguments. In N.\u00a0Maudet, S.\u00a0Parsons, & I.\u00a0Rahwan (Eds.), ArgMAS (pp. 54\u201373). Springer."},{"key":"CIT0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nieves, J. C., Cort\u00e9s, U. & Osorio, M. (2008). Possibilistic-based argumentation: An answer set programming approach. In A. F.\u00a0Gelbukh & M. E.\u00a0Adiba (Eds.), ENC (pp. 249\u2013260). IEEE Computer Society.","DOI":"10.1109\/ENC.2008.37"},{"key":"CIT0051","unstructured":"Parent, X. & van der Torre, L. (2013). Input\/output logic. In D.\u00a0Gabbay, J.\u00a0Horty, X.\u00a0Parent, R.\u00a0van der Meyden, & L.\u00a0van der Torre (Eds.), Handbook of deontic logic and normative systems (pp. 499\u2013544). London: College Publications."},{"key":"CIT0052","unstructured":"Podlaszewski, M., Caminada, M. & Pigozzi, G. (2011). An implementation of basic argumentation components. In L.\u00a0Sonenberg, P.\u00a0Stone, K.\u00a0Tumer, & P.\u00a0Yolum (Eds.), AAMAS (pp. 1307\u20131308). IFAAMAS."},{"key":"CIT0053","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_9"},{"key":"CIT0054","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/11663081.1997.10510900"},{"key":"CIT0055","unstructured":"Prakken, H. & Vreeswijk, G. (2002). Logical systems for defeasible argumentation. In D.\u00a0Gabbay & F.\u00a0Guenther (Eds.), Handbook of philosophy and logic (pp. 219\u2013318). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer."},{"key":"CIT0056","unstructured":"Schlesinger, F., Errecalde, M. & Aguirre, G. (2010). An approach to integrate web services and argumentation into a BDI system (extended abstract). In W.\u00a0van der Hoek, G. A.\u00a0Kaminka, Y.\u00a0Lesp\u00e9rance, M.\u00a0Luck, & S.\u00a0Sen (Eds.), AAMAS (pp. 1371\u20131372). IFAAMAS."},{"key":"CIT0057","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(92)90069-A"},{"key":"CIT0058","unstructured":"South, M., Vreeswijk, G. & Fox, J. (2008). Dungine: A java dung reasoner. In P.\u00a0Besnard, S.\u00a0Doutre, & A.\u00a0Hunter (Eds.), COMMA (pp. 360\u2013368). IOS."},{"key":"CIT0059","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(96)00041-0"},{"volume-title":"Studies in defeasible argumentation\u00a0","year":"1993","author":"Vreeswijk G. A. W.","key":"CIT0060"},{"key":"CIT0061","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2514601.2514640"}],"container-title":["Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1080\/0952813X.2015.1024490","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,28]],"date-time":"2025-05-28T01:13:58Z","timestamp":1748394838000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/full\/10.1080\/0952813X.2015.1024490"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,5,19]]},"references-count":60,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1-2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,1,11]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,3,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1080\/0952813X.2015.1024490"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/0952813x.2015.1024490","relation":{},"ISSN":["0952-813X","1362-3079"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0952-813X"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1362-3079"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,5,19]]},"assertion":[{"value":"The publishing and review policy for this title is described in its Aims & Scope.","order":1,"name":"peerreview_statement","label":"Peer Review Statement"},{"value":"http:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/action\/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=teta20","URL":"http:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/action\/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=teta20","order":2,"name":"aims_and_scope_url","label":"Aim & Scope"}]}}