{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,24]],"date-time":"2025-04-24T17:10:01Z","timestamp":1745514601990,"version":"3.40.4"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Duke University Press","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":["www.tandfonline.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p>Recently published, Senator Russ Feingold and Stanford scholar Peter Prindiville\u2019s, The Constitution in Jeopardy: An Unprecedented Effort to Rewrite Our Fundamental Law and What We Can Do About it, criticizes a current Republican effort to call a constitutional convention under Article V of the U.S. Constitution. This paper argues that progressives, like these authors, and defenders of democracy are mistaken to defend the status quo of the U.S. Constitution. Rather, while the political stakes are certainly high, the effort to create a constitutional convention may be an opportunity for U.S. citizens across the spectrum to engage in constitutional politics aimed at altering the Constitution. A fully engaged citizenry and political elite\u2014rather than one political side in a politically polarized society\u2014would be healthier for the future of a successful modern democracy. This essay will engage Feingold and Prindiville\u2019s challenging argument opposing the Republican effort to call a constitutional convention under Article V which states that Congress, \u201con the application of legislatures of two-thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments.\u201d Roughly 20 states of the 34 required have passed such resolutions. While there are 27 Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, Article V has never been used to call a convention. A second aim of the essay is to review the democratic critique of the Constitution, and argue that democratic reform is urgently needed. From the perspective of effective modern democracy, the goal of constitutional change should be seen as imperative: consideration should be given to alter the countermajoritarian and unrepresentative features of the Constitution. These counter-majoritarian constraints in the U.S. Constitution are an institutional cause of \u201cAmerican Exceptionalism:\u201d why is the United States more libertarian, with only a weak social democratic tradition, and always challenged to create efficient and representative policies? In short, I will argue that progressives must win the battle for democracy and make efforts to reform the Constitution.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1080\/07393148.2023.2203057","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,10]],"date-time":"2023-05-10T23:46:25Z","timestamp":1683762385000},"page":"380-404","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/tandf_crossmark_01","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Should Progressives Fight or Welcome the Republican Effort to Call a Constitutional Convention?"],"prefix":"10.1215","volume":"45","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9575-1071","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"William L.","family":"Niemi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Western Colorado University, Gunnison, CO, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"73","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,1]]},"container-title":["New Political Science"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/read.dukeupress.edu\/nps\/article-pdf\/45\/2\/380\/2235783\/380niemi.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/read.dukeupress.edu\/nps\/article-pdf\/45\/2\/380\/2235783\/380niemi.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,24]],"date-time":"2025-04-24T16:29:23Z","timestamp":1745512163000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/read.dukeupress.edu\/nps\/article\/45\/2\/380\/397903\/Should-Progressives-Fight-or-Welcome-the"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,1]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,1]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07393148.2023.2203057","relation":{},"ISSN":["0739-3148","1469-9931"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0739-3148"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1469-9931"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2023,6]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"The publishing and review policy for this title is described in its Aims & Scope.","order":1,"name":"peerreview_statement","label":"Peer Review Statement"},{"value":"http:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/action\/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=cnps20","URL":"http:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/action\/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=cnps20","order":2,"name":"aims_and_scope_url","label":"Aim & Scope"},{"value":"2022-11-25","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2023-03-30","order":1,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2023-04-12","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2023-05-10","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}