{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,22]],"date-time":"2026-02-22T17:02:47Z","timestamp":1771779767414,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,7,1]],"date-time":"2013-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1372636800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Learned Publishing"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>ABSTRACT<\/jats:title><jats:p>A growing number of online journals and academic platforms are adopting light peer review or \u2018publish then filter\u2019 models of scholarly communication. These approaches have the advantage of enabling instant exchanges of knowledge between academics and are part of a wider search for alternatives to traditional peer review and certification processes in scholarly publishing. However, establishing credibility and identifying the correct balance between communication and scholarly rigour remains an important challenge for digital communication platforms targeting academic communities. This paper looks at a highly influential, government\u2010backed, open publishing platform in China: Science Paper Online, which is using transparent post\u2010publication peer\u2010review processes to encourage innovation and address systemic problems in China's traditional academic publishing system. There can be little doubt that the Chinese academic publishing landscape differs in important ways from counterparts in the United States and Western Europe. However, this article suggests that developments in China also provide important lessons about the potential of digital technology and government policy to facilitate a large\u2010scale shift towards more open and networked models of scholarly communication.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1087\/20130308","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,6,11]],"date-time":"2013-06-11T22:57:52Z","timestamp":1370991472000},"page":"197-205","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Beyond online preprints: formalization of open initiatives in China"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"26","author":[{"given":"Xiang","family":"REN","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Southern Queensland  Australia"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,7]]},"container-title":["Learned Publishing"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1087%2F20130308","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1087\/20130308","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,23]],"date-time":"2023-11-23T08:07:04Z","timestamp":1700726824000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1087\/20130308"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,7]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1087\/20130308"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1087\/20130308","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0953-1513","1741-4857"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0953-1513","type":"print"},{"value":"1741-4857","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2013-07-01","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}