{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,8]],"date-time":"2026-10-08T07:52:57Z","timestamp":1791445977127,"version":"4.3.3"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"IOP Publishing","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,8]],"date-time":"2026-10-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1791417600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/publishingsupport.iopscience.iop.org\/iop-standard\/v1"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,8]],"date-time":"2026-10-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1791417600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/info\/page\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["iopscience.iop.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J. Radiol. Prot."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,12,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Managing radiation protection (RP) in relation to recurrent imaging continues to be debated. Recent arguments have focussed on high cumulative effective dose (CED), especially where it exceeds 100 mSv. This article argues that CED should not be the primary focus for tracking concerns on recurrent imaging. Arguments which advocate for increased RP measures after 100 mSv is exceeded are criticised as being in conflict with the linear no threshold model. Finally, a view of dose history as adding to background risk is discussed.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1088\/1361-6498\/aeadac","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T22:48:21Z","timestamp":1790722101000},"page":"044002","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1088\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["A criticism of three arguments on recurrent imaging and risk"],"prefix":"10.1088","volume":"46","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8812-2499","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"C","family":"Walsh","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"St James\u2019s Hospital"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"266","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"jrpaeadacbib1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1828","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-019-06523-y","type":"journal-article","article-title":"Patients undergoing recurrent CT scans: assessing the magnitude","volume":"30","author":"Rehani","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur. Radiol."},{"key":"jrpaeadacbib2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3719","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-023-10299-7","type":"journal-article","article-title":"Cumulative radiation exposure from multimodality recurrent imaging of CT, fluoroscopically guided intervention, and nuclear medicine","volume":"34","author":"Li","year":"2024","journal-title":"Eur. Radiol."},{"key":"jrpaeadacbib3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2137","DOI":"10.1093\/bjr\/tqag134","type":"journal-article","article-title":"European multicenter study on recurrent imaging practice in computed tomography","volume":"99","author":"Brambilla","year":"2026","journal-title":"Br. J. Radiol."},{"key":"jrpaeadacbib4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2493","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-019-06528-7","type":"journal-article","article-title":"Multinational data on cumulative radiation exposure of patients from recurrent radiological procedures: call for action","volume":"30","author":"Brambilla","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur. Radiol."},{"key":"jrpaeadacbib5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5514","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-021-07696-1","type":"journal-article","article-title":"Cumulative effective dose from recurrent CT examinations in Europe: proposal for clinical guidance based on an ESR EuroSafe Imaging survey","volume":"31","author":"Frija","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur. Radiol."},{"key":"jrpaeadacbib6","article-title":"Joint position statement and call for action for strengthening radiation protection of patients undergoing recurrent radiological imaging procedures","author":"International Atomic Energy Agency","year":"2021","type":"other"},{"key":"jrpaeadacbib7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6475","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-024-10659-x","type":"journal-article","article-title":"Recurrent medical imaging exposures for the care of patients: one way forward","volume":"34","author":"Frush","year":"2024","journal-title":"Eur. Radiol."},{"key":"jrpaeadacbib8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.10.6195","type":"journal-article","article-title":"A rational approach to the clinical use of cumulative effective dose estimates","volume":"197","author":"Durand","year":"2011","journal-title":"AJR Am. J. Roentgenol."},{"key":"jrpaeadacbib9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20130682","type":"journal-article","article-title":"Should the justification of medical exposures take account of radiation risks from previous examinations?","volume":"87","author":"Walsh","year":"2014","journal-title":"Br. J. Radiol."},{"key":"jrpaeadacbib10","article-title":"National research council 2006 committee to assess health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation","author":"US National Academy of Sciences","year":"2006","type":"book"},{"key":"jrpaeadacbib11","article-title":"Implications of recent epidemiologic studies for the linear-non threshold model and radiation protection (NCRP Commentary No. 27)","author":"National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements","year":"2018","type":"other"},{"key":"jrpaeadacbib12","article-title":"Health Effects of Low Doses of Radiation:. Perspectives on Integrating Radiation Biology and Epidemiology","author":"NCRP Commentary No 24","year":"2015","type":"other"},{"key":"jrpaeadacbib13","author":"United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation","year":"2022","type":"report"},{"key":"jrpaeadacbib14","first-page":"1","type":"other","article-title":"Council Directive 2013\/59\/Euratom of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation, and repealing Directives 89\/618\/Euratom, 90\/641\/Euratom, 96\/29\/Euratom, 97\/43\/Euratom and 2003\/122\/Euratom","volume":"13","author":"Council of the European Union","year":"2014"}],"container-title":["Journal of Radiological Protection"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/article\/10.1088\/1361-6498\/aeadac","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"am","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/article\/10.1088\/1361-6498\/aeadac\/pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"am","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/article\/10.1088\/1361-6498\/aeadac","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/article\/10.1088\/1361-6498\/aeadac\/pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/article\/10.1088\/1361-6498\/aeadac\/pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"am","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/article\/10.1088\/1361-6498\/aeadac\/pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/article\/10.1088\/1361-6498\/aeadac\/pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"am","intended-application":"similarity-checking"},{"URL":"https:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/article\/10.1088\/1361-6498\/aeadac\/pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,8]],"date-time":"2026-10-08T07:12:44Z","timestamp":1791443564000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/article\/10.1088\/1361-6498\/aeadac"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,8]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,8]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,12,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1088\/1361-6498\/aeadac","relation":{},"ISSN":["0952-4746","1361-6498"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0952-4746","type":"print"},{"value":"1361-6498","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"A criticism of three arguments on recurrent imaging and risk","name":"article_title","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Radiological Protection","name":"journal_title","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"paper","name":"article_type","label":"Article Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2026 Society for Radiological Protection. Published on behalf of SRP by IOP Publishing Limited. All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.","name":"copyright_information","label":"Copyright Information"},{"value":"2026-08-14","name":"date_received","label":"Date Received","group":{"name":"publication_dates","label":"Publication dates"}},{"value":"2026-09-29","name":"date_accepted","label":"Date Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_dates","label":"Publication dates"}},{"value":"2026-10-08","name":"date_epub","label":"Online publication date","group":{"name":"publication_dates","label":"Publication dates"}}]}}