{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]],"date-time":"2026-04-29T09:39:18Z","timestamp":1777455558165,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,10,1]],"date-time":"2011-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1317427200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Breastfeeding Medicine"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,10,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>State worksite breastfeeding statutes are thought to play a role in increasing rates of breastfeeding duration, which remain below Healthy People 2010 goals. As of 2010 24 states including the District of Columbia had such worksite statutes. Of these only 18 required both break time and a site. This preliminary analysis assessed if infants born in states with worksite breastfeeding statutes had longer breastfeeding duration.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Using the 2009 National Immunization Survey we analyzed infants comparing breastfeeding duration at 6 months with type of worksite breastfeeding statute in place, while adjusting for year enacted and other state characteristics (years since founding of state breastfeeding coalition, breastfeeding supportive hospital practices). Other covariates included maternal and infant characteristics. Only those infants whose mothers were at least 18 years old and who had not changed state of residence since birth were included (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n<\/jats:italic>\n                      =16,145).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Although requiring a site and\/or break time for breastfeeding increased the likelihood of breastfeeding at 6 months (odds ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.07\u20131.35;\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">p<\/jats:italic>\n                      =0.002), after accounting for other factors this relationship remained positive but was not significant (adjusted odd ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.92\u20131.24). Because all mothers, not just those in or returning to the workforce, were included in the analysis this relationship could be underestimated. Breastfeeding at 6 months was associated with being from a state that had had a breastfeeding coalition for a longer period of time (adjusted odds ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.04\u20131.49;\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">p<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt;0001).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>State worksite breastfeeding statutes alone may not directly affect breastfeeding duration. Analysis of breastfeeding duration using the multiple levels of the social-ecological model is a potentially useful approach to understanding the impact of state breastfeeding statutes. The impact of state breastfeeding coalitions warrants further study.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1089\/bfm.2011.0082","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,10,18]],"date-time":"2011-10-18T15:22:29Z","timestamp":1318951349000},"page":"319-324","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["State Breastfeeding Worksite Statutes.\u2026Breastfeeding Rates\u2026and.\u2026."],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"6","author":[{"given":"Ann M.","family":"Dozier","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Rochester"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kimberly S.","family":"McKee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Rochester"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,10,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_2","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breastfeeding Among U.S. Children Born 1999\u20142007 National Immunization Survey. 2010. www.cdc.gov\/breastfeeding\/data\/NIS_data\/. 2011 June 20."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.profnurs.2005.05.006"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_2","volume-title":"The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Support Breastfeeding","author":"U.S. Department of Health and Human Services","year":"2011","unstructured":"U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Support Breastfeeding. Office of the Surgeon General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC, 2011."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_5_2","unstructured":"U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020. 2010. www.healthypeople.gov\/2020\/topicsobjectives2020\/objectiveslist.aspx?topicId=26. 2011 June 20."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_6_2","volume-title":"Investigating in Workplace Breastfeeding Programs and Policies: An Employer's Toolkit","author":"Slavit W","year":"2009","unstructured":"Slavit W. Investigating in Workplace Breastfeeding Programs and Policies: An Employer's Toolkit. National Business Group on Health, Center for Prevention and Health Services: Washington, DC, 2009."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_7_2","first-page":"CD006177","article-title":"Interventions in the workplace to support breastfeeding for women in employment","volume":"3","author":"Abdulwadud OA","year":"2007","unstructured":"Abdulwadud OA, , Snow ME. Interventions in the workplace to support breastfeeding for women in employment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2007; 3:CD006177.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_8_2","unstructured":"National Conference of State Legislatures. Breastfeeding Laws. 2010. www.ncsl.org\/default.aspx?tabid=14389. 2011 July 11."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_9_2","first-page":"155","article-title":"Is the breast best for business?: The implications of the breastfeeding promotion act","volume":"2","author":"Mohler B","year":"2011","unstructured":"Mohler B. Is the breast best for business?: The implications of the breastfeeding promotion act. William Mary Business Law Rev, 2011; 2:155\u2013184.","journal-title":"William Mary Business Law Rev"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_10_2","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breastfeeding Report Card. 2010. www.cdc.gov\/breastfeeding\/pdf\/BreastfeedingReportCard2010.pdf. 2011 June 20."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2009.185280"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0890334410379797"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0890334405275372"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_14_2","unstructured":"National Center for Health Statistics U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The 2009 National Immunization Survey. 2010. www.cdc.gov\/nchs\/nis.htm. 2011 June 20."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2007.127118"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_16_2","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Survey of Maternity Practices in Infant Nutrition and Care (mPINC) www.cdc.gov\/breastfeeding\/data\/mpinc\/index.htm. 2011 June 20."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_17_2","first-page":"621","article-title":"Breastfeeding-related maternity practices at hospitals and birth centers\u2014United States, 2007","volume":"57","author":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention","year":"2008","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breastfeeding-related maternity practices at hospitals and birth centers\u2014United States, 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 2008; 57:621\u2013625.","journal-title":"MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_18_2","unstructured":"Baby-Friendly USA Inc. Info for Hospitals and Birth Centers. www.babyfriendlyusa.org\/eng\/04.html. 2011 June 20."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_19_2","unstructured":"HR Specialist: California Employment Law. Santa Clara Firm Fined for Not Accommodating Lactating Mom. Business Management Daily July 18 2008. www.businessmanagementdaily.com\/articles\/8991\/1\/Santa-Clara-firm-fined-for-not-accommodating-lactating-mom\/Page1.html. 2011 June 20"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_20_2","unstructured":"Carsen J. Parental Rights in the Workplace. California Employer Daily May 1 2003. www.ced.blr.com\/b\/discrimination-harassment-discipline\/archive\/2003\/05\/02\/parental-rights-in-the-workplace-legislature-pays-540-000-to-settle-lawsuit-by-nursing-mother-who-was-demoted-accommodation-guidelines.aspx. 2011 June 20."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/tc.2009.029538"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_22_2","first-page":"103","article-title":"Case studies from two collaboratives on diabetes in Washington State","volume":"30","author":"Daniel DM","year":"2004","unstructured":"Daniel DM, , Norman J, , Davis C et al. Case studies from two collaboratives on diabetes in Washington State. Jt Comm J Qual Saf, 2004; 3057103\u2013108.","journal-title":"Jt Comm J Qual Saf"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_23_2","first-page":"e1","article-title":"A statewide initiative to reduce inappropriate scheduled births at 36(0\/7)\u201338(6\/7) weeks' gestation","volume":"202","author":"Donovan EF","year":"2010","unstructured":"Donovan EF, , Lannon C, , Bailit J. A statewide initiative to reduce inappropriate scheduled births at 36(0\/7)\u201338(6\/7) weeks' gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2010; 202:e1\u2013e8.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clp.2010.01.004"}],"container-title":["Breastfeeding Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1089\/bfm.2011.0082","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1089\/bfm.2011.0082","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1089\/bfm.2011.0082","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T12:59:29Z","timestamp":1777381169000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1089\/bfm.2011.0082"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,10,1]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,10,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1089\/bfm.2011.0082"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/bfm.2011.0082","relation":{},"ISSN":["1556-8253","1556-8342"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1556-8253","type":"print"},{"value":"1556-8342","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,10,1]]}}}