{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,30]],"date-time":"2026-04-30T22:35:21Z","timestamp":1777588521832,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,12,1]],"date-time":"2013-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1385856000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Endourology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background and Purpose:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A well-known complication of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is pleural injury. Pneumothorax and hydrothorax sustained during PCNL may necessitate the placement of a chest tube. Current literature describes placement of standard chest tubes as well as small-bore catheters for management of hydrothorax sustained during PCNL. This study aims to better delineate the clinical utility and outcomes associated with use of small-bore catheters when compared with standard chest tubes for managing pneumothorax and hydrothorax after PCNL.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Patients and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We queried an institutional database of 735 renal units that underwent PCNL for endourologic disease between 2001 and 2013. Postoperative upright chest radiographs were analyzed in patients who needed chest tube placement for pneumothorax or hydrothorax after PCNL. Those who met inclusion criteria were divided based on the size of chest tube placed: Small-bore (8\u201312F) or standard chest tube (32F). Analysis of clinical outcomes was performed.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Of the 735 procedures, 15 (2% of total, 7 right, 8 left) needed chest tube placement for a pleural injury after PCNL. Those who needed chest tube placement had an average stone size of 2.1\u2009cm. Five had large-bore standard chest tubes (32F) and 10 had small-bore catheters (&lt;14F) for management of pleural injury. The average length of time the chest tube stayed in place was 3.9 days (minimum 2, maximum 6) for small bore and 4.4 days (minimum 2, maximum 7) for standard chest tubes. There was a statistical trend toward decreased hospital stay and decreased length of time the chest tube was in place when a small-bore chest tube was used.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The use of small-bore catheters for management of hydrothorax and pneumothorax have reasonable clinical outcomes when compared with standard large-bore chest tubes after PCNL.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2013.0175","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,12,5]],"date-time":"2013-12-05T10:44:22Z","timestamp":1386240262000},"page":"1440-1443","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Small-Bore Catheter Drainage of Pleural Injury After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Feasibility and Outcome from a Single Large Institution Series"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"27","author":[{"given":"Jonas S.","family":"Benson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Loyola University Medical Center"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Spencer T.","family":"Hart","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Loyola University Medical Center"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Adam O.","family":"Kadlec","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Loyola University Medical Center"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Thomas","family":"Turk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Loyola University Medical Center"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/21681805.1976.11882084"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ucl.2012.09.012","article-title":"Advances in percutaneous nephrolithotomy","volume":"40","author":"Antonelli JA","year":"2013","unstructured":"Antonelli JA, , Pearle MS. Advances in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Clin North Am, 2013; 40:99\u2013113.","journal-title":"Urol Clin North Am"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/089277903767923218"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2004.18.743"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1159\/000332151","article-title":"Nephrostomy tube-free versus nephrostomy tube for renal drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"88","author":"Shen P","year":"2012","unstructured":"Shen P, , Liu Y, , Wang J. Nephrostomy tube-free versus nephrostomy tube for renal drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Int, 2012; 88:298\u2013306.","journal-title":"Urol Int"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/089277901750426337"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_8_2","first-page":"447","article-title":"Complications associated with percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: Supra- versus subcostal access. A retrospective study","volume":"44","author":"Radecka E","year":"2003","unstructured":"Radecka E, , Brehmer M, , Holmgren K, , Magnusson A. Complications associated with percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: Supra- versus subcostal access. A retrospective study. Acta Radiol, 2003; 44:447\u2013451.","journal-title":"Acta Radiol"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2006.20.491"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)65745-X"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"568","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2012.09.035","article-title":"Isolated upper pole access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A large-scale analysis from the CROES percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study","volume":"189","author":"Tefekli A","year":"2013","unstructured":"Tefekli A, , Esen T, , Olbert PJ, et al. Isolated upper pole access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A large-scale analysis from the CROES percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study. J Urol, 2013; 189:568\u2013573.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1209","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2008.0438","article-title":"Supra-twelfth supracostal access: When and where to puncture?","volume":"22","author":"Yadav R","year":"2008","unstructured":"Yadav R, , Gupta NP, , Gamanagatti S, et al. Supra-twelfth supracostal access: When and where to puncture?. J Endourol, 2008; 22:1209\u20131212.","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11255-007-9270-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2007.0054"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1267","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1442-2042.2006.01537.x","article-title":"Safety of supracostal punctures for percutaneous renal surgery","volume":"13","author":"Yadav R","year":"2006","unstructured":"Yadav R, , Aron M, , Gupta NP, et al. Safety of supracostal punctures for percutaneous renal surgery. Int J Urol, 2006; 13:1267\u20131270.","journal-title":"Int J Urol"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000089168"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1007\/s00270-004-0228-9","article-title":"Is the 10th and 11th intercostal space a safe approach for percutaneous nephrostomy and nephrolithotomy?","volume":"27","author":"Muzrakchi AA","year":"2004","unstructured":"Muzrakchi AA, , Szmigielski W, , Omar AJ, , Younes NM. Is the 10th and 11th intercostal space a safe approach for percutaneous nephrostomy and nephrolithotomy?. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2004; 27:503\u2013506.","journal-title":"Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.1089\/089277902760367430","article-title":"Single upper-pole percutaneous access for treatment of>or=5-cm complex branched staghorn calculi: Is shockwave lithotripsy necessary?","volume":"16","author":"Wong C","year":"2002","unstructured":"Wong C, , Leveillee RJ. Single upper-pole percutaneous access for treatment of>or=5-cm complex branched staghorn calculi: Is shockwave lithotripsy necessary?. J Endourol, 2002; 16:477\u2013481.","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1464-410X.2002.03051.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/089277901753205753"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/end.1998.12.403"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/028418519103200217"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.147.2.393","article-title":"Intercostal-space nephrostomy for percutaneous stone removal","volume":"147","author":"Picus D","year":"1986","unstructured":"Picus D, , Weyman PJ, , Clayman RV, , McClennan BL. Intercostal-space nephrostomy for percutaneous stone removal. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1986; 147:393\u2013397.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1265","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.145.6.1265","article-title":"Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: Application to staghorn calculi","volume":"145","author":"Young AT","year":"1985","unstructured":"Young AT, , Hulbert JC, , Cardella JF, et al. Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: Application to staghorn calculi. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1985; 145:1265\u20131269.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_25_2","first-page":"1352","volume-title":"Campbell-Walsh Urology","author":"Wein AJ","year":"2012","unstructured":"Wein AJ, , Kavoussi LR, , Novick AC, , Partin AW, , Peters CA, eds. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2012, p 1352.","edition":"10"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003246-198606000-00012"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1440-1843.2010.01913.x","article-title":"Pleural controversy: Optimal chest tube size for drainage","volume":"16","author":"Light RW","year":"2011","unstructured":"Light RW. Pleural controversy: Optimal chest tube size for drainage. Respirology, 2011; 16:244\u2013248.","journal-title":"Respirology"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00063198-200307000-00006"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1269836"},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_3_2_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1136\/thx.2010.137026","article-title":"Pleural procedures and thoracic ultrasound: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010","volume":"65","author":"Havelock T","year":"2010","unstructured":"Havelock T, , Teoh R, , Laws D, , Gleeson F. Pleural procedures and thoracic ultrasound: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax, 2010; 65(suppl 2):ii61\u201376.","journal-title":"Thorax"}],"container-title":["Journal of Endourology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1089\/end.2013.0175","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1089\/end.2013.0175","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1089\/end.2013.0175","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T20:14:31Z","timestamp":1777407271000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full\/10.1089\/end.2013.0175"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,12]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1089\/end.2013.0175"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2013.0175","relation":{},"ISSN":["0892-7790","1557-900X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0892-7790","type":"print"},{"value":"1557-900X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,12]]}}}