{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,30]],"date-time":"2026-04-30T22:52:41Z","timestamp":1777589561009,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,1]],"date-time":"2020-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1596240000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Endourology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,8]]},"abstract":"\n Background:<\/jats:title>\n \n A single-use flexible cystoscope with integrated grasper (\n Isiris<\/jats:italic>\n ; Coloplast, Denmark) has recently become commercially available. The objective of our study is to compare the costs of stent removal in an outpatient clinical environment between the single-use\n Isiris<\/jats:italic>\n system (Coloplast) to our existing approach using a reusable cystoscope and stent grasper.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Materials and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n \n The number of stent removal procedures at our tertiary center was recorded as a proportion of all cystoscopic procedures performed between February 2016 and February 2017. Elements in the micro-cost assessment included original purchasing price of an Olympus digital reusable cystoscope, repair fee (based on a 1-year contract), sterilization equipment and accessory costs, reprocessing costs of the cystoscope, and labor costs. The costs were estimated on a per-use basis and compared to the purchasing price of\n Isiris<\/jats:italic>\n .\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results:<\/jats:title>\n \n A total of 1775 cystoscopic procedures were performed, and the reusable cystoscope was used for stent removal in 871 (49%) cases. The per-use cost for stent removal procedures using the reusable cystoscope was estimated to be $161.85. The single per-use purchasing price for the\n Isiris<\/jats:italic>\n device is $200. Based on the current volume, the break-even point was calculated to be 704 stent pulls. After 704 stent pulls, the cost benefit favors the reusable cystoscope.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n Based on this micro-cost analysis, per-use costs appear to favor the reusable cystoscope for stent removal. It appears that centers with high volumes of stent pulls may find the reusable cystoscope and stent grasper more cost beneficial than the single-use system.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2020.0144","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,30]],"date-time":"2020-06-30T02:32:56Z","timestamp":1593484376000},"page":"816-820","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Single-Use Grasper Integrated Flexible Cystoscope for Stent Removal: A Micro-Costing Analysis-Based Comparison"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"34","author":[{"given":"Sarah C.","family":"Beebe","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lawrence C.","family":"Jenkins","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tasha","family":"Posid","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Bodo E.","family":"Knudsen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Michael W.","family":"Sourial","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_2","unstructured":"Wein AJ Kavoussi LR Partin AW Peters C. Campbell-Walsh Urology. Philadelphia PA: Elsevier 2016."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.22374\/jeleu.v1i1.5"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_2","first-page":"196","article-title":"Office-based ureteric stent removal is achievable, improves clinical flexibility and quality of care, whilst also keeping surgeons close to their patients","volume":"71","author":"Baston EL","year":"2018","unstructured":"Baston EL, , Wellum S, , Bredow Z, et al. Office-based ureteric stent removal is achievable, improves clinical flexibility and quality of care, whilst also keeping surgeons close to their patients. Cent Eur J Urol, 2018; 71:196\u2013201.","journal-title":"Cent Eur J Urol"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2013.01.029"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/JU.0000000000000108"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2017.0463"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0090-4295(97)00218-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-016-1987-z"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-016-1986-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2007.07.014"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.09.085"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.14235"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2017.0523"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.21037\/tau.2019.06.13"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_16_2","first-page":"329","article-title":"Ureteral stent removal using an extraction string after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: A cost-benefit analysis","volume":"15","author":"Liu H","year":"2018","unstructured":"Liu H, , Pan W, , Zhang N. Ureteral stent removal using an extraction string after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: A cost-benefit analysis. Urol J, 2018; 15:329\u2013332.","journal-title":"Urol J"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-016-0898-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2014.12.087"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2018.0141"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2018.0001"}],"container-title":["Journal of Endourology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1089\/end.2020.0144","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1089\/end.2020.0144","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1089\/end.2020.0144","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T20:17:41Z","timestamp":1777407461000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1089\/end.2020.0144"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,8]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1089\/end.2020.0144"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2020.0144","relation":{},"ISSN":["0892-7790","1557-900X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0892-7790","type":"print"},{"value":"1557-900X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,8]]}}}