{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,13]],"date-time":"2026-10-13T17:02:03Z","timestamp":1791910923309,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,1]],"date-time":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672531200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Endourology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) is under investigation for whole-gland ablation of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. The ideal method for post-TULSA bladder drainage through postoperative suprapubic tube (SPT)\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">vs<\/jats:italic>\n                      indwelling urethral catheter (UC) has not been established. The objective of this study was to evaluate urinary outcomes after whole-gland TULSA, comparing postoperative SPT with UC.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Materials and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Two-institution retrospective analysis of whole-gland TULSA for men with grade group 1 and 2 prostate cancer. One institution placed SPT at the time of TULSA with clamp trials (day 10) and removal once voiding. The second placed UC until void trial (day 7). Outcomes included the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), urinary bother score, catheter reinsertion, stricture, clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), and incontinence.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Forty-five patients (median age 67) were analyzed. The UC cohort (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">N<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u200926) was older (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.007) than the SPT cohort (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">N<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u200919) but with similar baseline prostate volumes, IPSS, and urinary bother scores. Patients receiving UC had fewer days with catheter (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.013). Although UC patients suffered more lower urinary tract symptoms at 1-month post-TULSA, there was no significant difference between IPSS scores at baseline and 6 months after surgery regardless of urinary management strategy, although the UC group noted significantly decreased urinary bother. Rates of infection were similar between groups. Six strictures were observed overall, with more in the SPT group, although the difference was not significant (4\/19 [21.1%] SPT; 2\/26 [7.7%] UC). At 6 months, incontinence rates were low and similar between groups (2\/19 [10.5%] SPT; 4\/26 [15.4%] UC) and only one patient (UC) required CIC.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Our overall findings suggest that SPT and UC are both acceptable options for postoperative bladder drainage after whole-gland TULSA, with statistically similar rates of urinary complications but a slightly different side effect profile.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2022.0214","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,26]],"date-time":"2022-08-26T03:34:53Z","timestamp":1661484893000},"page":"1-7","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Urinary Outcomes After Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Whole-Gland Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation for Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Suprapubic Tube to Indwelling Urethral Catheter"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"37","author":[{"given":"Matthew J.","family":"Rabinowitz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nora M.","family":"Haney","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Amanda A.","family":"Myers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9248-1328","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Chandler D.","family":"Dora","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christian P.","family":"Pavlovich","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_4_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euo.2020.03.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1209978"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2011.11.053"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2009.1451"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ctrv.2016.07.004"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvir.2019.12.802"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/JU.0000000000001362"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/17434440.2020.1755258"},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_3_4_10_2","first-page":"369","article-title":"Urinary catheter management","volume":"61","author":"Cravens DD","year":"2000","unstructured":"Cravens DD, , Zweig S. Urinary catheter management. Am Fam Physician, 2000; 61(2):369\u2013376.","journal-title":"Am Fam Physician"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-0690(18)30446-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asjsur.2018.08.004"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.12112263"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.06.100"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2011.10.021"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_17_2","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). CAUTI Guidelines | Guidelines Library | Infection Control | CDC. June 18 2019. Available from: https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/infectioncontrol\/guidelines\/cauti\/index.html [Last accessed: January 16 2022]."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.aje.a113988"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2017.07.069"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM197408012910501"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/TA.0b013e318174f126"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3909\/riu0685"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/and.13789"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.26400"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/JU.0000000000001327"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0022-5347(01)66780-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-003-7397-6"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_3_4_28_2","first-page":"56","article-title":"Predicting outcome of trial of voiding without catheter in acute urinary retention with intravesical prostatic protrusion","volume":"20","author":"Syazarina Sharis O","year":"2013","unstructured":"Syazarina Sharis O, , Zulkifli MZ, , Hamzaini AH. Predicting outcome of trial of voiding without catheter in acute urinary retention with intravesical prostatic protrusion. Malays J Med Sci, 2013; 20(1):56\u201359.","journal-title":"Malays J Med Sci"},{"issue":"4","key":"e_1_3_4_29_2","first-page":"485","article-title":"Is there a better indicator for predicting the outcome of trial without catheter?","volume":"23","author":"Shanmugasundaram R","year":"2007","unstructured":"Shanmugasundaram R, , Kekre NS. Is there a better indicator for predicting the outcome of trial without catheter?. Indian J Urol, 2007; 23(4):485\u2013486.","journal-title":"Indian J Urol"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000512"}],"container-title":["Journal of Endourology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1089\/end.2022.0214","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1089\/end.2022.0214","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1089\/end.2022.0214","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T20:14:30Z","timestamp":1777407270000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1089\/end.2022.0214"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,1]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1089\/end.2022.0214"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2022.0214","relation":{},"ISSN":["0892-7790","1557-900X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0892-7790","type":"print"},{"value":"1557-900X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,1]]}}}