{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,3]],"date-time":"2026-08-03T21:05:12Z","timestamp":1785791112546,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,1]],"date-time":"2024-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1727740800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Endourology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,10]]},"abstract":"\n Objective:<\/jats:title>\n To characterize our single institutional experience with robotic and open uretero-enteric stricture (UES) repair.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Materials and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n We queried our ureteral reconstructive database for UES repair between 01\/2017 and 10\/2023. Patients with <3 months follow-up were excluded. Prior to surgery, patients underwent ureteral rest (4 weeks) with conversion to nephrostomy tube. Clinical characteristics, complications, reconstructive success (uretero-enteric patency), need for repeat intervention, and renal function were assessed in patients undergoing open and robotic UES reconstruction.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results:<\/jats:title>\n \n Of 50 patients undergoing UES repair during the study period, 45 were included for analysis due to complete follow-up (34 [76%] robotic and 11 [24%] open repair). UES repair was performed in 50 renal units a median of 13 months (interquartile range 7\u201330) from index surgery, and most often involved the left renal unit (34\/50; 68%). Compared with robotic, open cases were significantly more likely to have undergone open cystectomy (100%\n vs<\/jats:italic>\n 68%,\n p<\/jats:italic>\n = 0.04), have longer strictures (median 4\n vs<\/jats:italic>\n 1 cm,\n p<\/jats:italic>\n < 0.001), require tissue substitution (27%\n vs<\/jats:italic>\n 3%,\n p<\/jats:italic>\n = 0.04), and have lengthier postoperative hospitalization (5\n vs<\/jats:italic>\n 2 days,\n p<\/jats:italic>\n < 0.001). There was no significant difference in total operative time (410\n vs<\/jats:italic>\n 322 minutes) or 30d major complications (18%\n vs<\/jats:italic>\n 21%). At a follow-up of 13 months, per patient reconstructive success was 100% (11\/11) for open and 97% (33\/34) for robotic, respectively.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n In select patients with short UES unlikely to require advanced reconstructive techniques, a robotic-assisted approach can be considered. Careful patient selection is associated with limited morbidity and high reconstructive success.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2024.0021","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,21]],"date-time":"2024-06-21T05:48:05Z","timestamp":1718948885000},"page":"1021-1026","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Open and Robotic Uretero-enteric Stricture Repair: Early Outcomes and Complications"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"38","author":[{"given":"Elizabeth N.","family":"Bearrick","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bridget L.","family":"Findlay","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anthony","family":"Fadel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4619-1773","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Aaron M.","family":"Potretzke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Katherine T.","family":"Anderson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Boyd R.","family":"Viers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_5_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21669"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2008.07.031"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0022-5347(17)60390-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2017.02.3339"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2012.09.034"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2015.03.014"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.21037\/tau.2019.09.05"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2013.09.011"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11934-018-0773-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2016.10.005"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0090-4295(01)01420-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/lap.2012.0550"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MOU.0000000000000470"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euros.2021.11.005"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2023.0204"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2021.11.020"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-019-01027-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2013.02.039"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00005392-199709000-00016"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000086701.68756.8f"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2007.11.083"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2011.01.040"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2008.0230"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2014.08.057"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2016.06.008"}],"container-title":["Journal of Endourology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1089\/end.2024.0021","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1089\/end.2024.0021","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1089\/end.2024.0021","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T20:15:35Z","timestamp":1777407335000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1089\/end.2024.0021"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,10]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1089\/end.2024.0021"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/end.2024.0021","relation":{},"ISSN":["0892-7790","1557-900X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0892-7790","type":"print"},{"value":"1557-900X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,10]]}}}