{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,15]],"date-time":"2026-05-15T20:03:47Z","timestamp":1778875427395,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,1]],"date-time":"2020-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1596240000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,1]],"date-time":"2020-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1596240000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Foodborne Pathogens and Disease"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,8]]},"abstract":"\n The survey was undertaken to investigate the presence and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of\n Salmonella<\/jats:italic>\n spp. in raw and ready-to-eat (RTE) foods, and\n Campylobacter<\/jats:italic>\n spp. in the retail raw chicken meat collected in two counties of Transylvania, Romania. A total of 13.1% (51\/388) of the examined food samples were found to be\n Salmonella<\/jats:italic>\n positive, with a distribution of 14.7% (48\/326) in the raw food (i.e., pork, chicken carcass, and shell egg) and 4.8% (3\/62) in the RTE samples (i.e., sausages, but not ham and salami), respectively. These differences were statistically significant (\n p<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009=\u20090.034). The isolates were serotyped as\n Salmonella<\/jats:italic>\n Infantis (\n n<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009=\u200919),\n Salmonella<\/jats:italic>\n Typhimurium (\n n<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009=\u200911)\n Salmonella<\/jats:italic>\n Rissen (\n n<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009=\u20098),\n Salmonella<\/jats:italic>\n Derby (\n n<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009=\u20093),\n Salmonella<\/jats:italic>\n Enteritidis (\n n<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009=\u20093),\n Salmonella<\/jats:italic>\n Bredeney (\n n<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009=\u20092),\n Salmonella<\/jats:italic>\n Brandenburg (\n n<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009=\u20091),\n Salmonella<\/jats:italic>\n Gloucester (\n n<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009=\u20091),\n Salmonella<\/jats:italic>\n Goldcoast (\n n<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009=\u20091),\n Salmonella<\/jats:italic>\n Kottbus (\n n<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009=\u20091), and\n Salmonella<\/jats:italic>\n Ruzizi (\n n<\/jats:italic>\n \u2009=\u20091).\n Campylobacter<\/jats:italic>\n strains were present in 29.4% (10\/34) of the investigated chicken samples, and the identified species were\n Campylobacter coli<\/jats:italic>\n (70%) and\n C. jejuni<\/jats:italic>\n (30%). From the 14 tested antimicrobials, the\n Salmonella<\/jats:italic>\n isolates were resistant against azithromycin (88.2%), tetracycline (54.9%), sulfamethoxazole (54.9%), ciprofloxacin (45.1%), nalidixic acid (43.1%), ampicillin (35.3%), chloramphenicol (33.3%), tigecycline (25.5%), cefotaxime (13.7%), colistin (13.7%), trimethoprim (7.8%), and gentamicin (2%), resulting in the expression of 21 multidrug-resistant (MDR) profiles. Of 10\n Campylobacter<\/jats:italic>\n isolates, 80% were resistant to ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid, 40% to tetracycline, and 10% to streptomycin and erythromycin, respectively. Our findings indicate that Romanian isolates of\n Salmonella<\/jats:italic>\n spp. and\n Campylobacter<\/jats:italic>\n spp., contaminating animal-origin foods, can exhibit MDR patterns, representing a public health risk.\n <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1089\/fpd.2019.2738","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,28]],"date-time":"2020-01-28T16:36:16Z","timestamp":1580229376000},"page":"479-484","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":45,"title":["Occurrence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile of\n Salmonella<\/i>\n spp. in Raw and Ready-To-Eat Foods and\n Campylobacter<\/i>\n spp. in Retail Raw Chicken Meat in Transylvania, Romania"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"17","author":[{"given":"Emil","family":"T\u00eerziu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Animal Production and Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Banat's University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine \u201cKing Michael I of Romania\u201d, Timi\u015foara, Romania."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Gabriel","family":"B\u0103rb\u0103lan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Animal Production and Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Banat's University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine \u201cKing Michael I of Romania\u201d, Timi\u015foara, Romania."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Adriana","family":"Morar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Animal Production and Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Banat's University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine \u201cKing Michael I of Romania\u201d, Timi\u015foara, Romania."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Viorel","family":"Herman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Infectious Diseases and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Banat's University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine \u201cKing Michael I of Romania\u201d, Timi\u015foara, Romania."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Romeo T.","family":"Cristina","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Banat's University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine \u201cKing Michael I of Romania\u201d, Timi\u015foara, Romania."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"K\u00e1lm\u00e1n","family":"Imre","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Animal Production and Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Banat's University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine \u201cKing Michael I of Romania\u201d, Timi\u015foara, Romania."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cmi.2015.12.004"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1541-4337.12001"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2807\/ese.15.24.19592-en"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_5_1","volume-title":"Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing","author":"Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI)","year":"2018","unstructured":"Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 28th ed. CLSI document M100-28. Wayne, PA: CLSI, 2018.","edition":"28"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_6_1","unstructured":"Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1441\/2007 of 5 December 2007 amending Regulation (EC) No. 2073\/2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs. Off J Eur Union L 338\/1. Available at: https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/legal-content\/EN\/TXT\/PDF\/?uri=CELEX:32007R1441&from=GA accessed July15 2019."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3855\/jidc.4958"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_8_1","unstructured":"EUCAST. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) Breakpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs and Zone Diameters Version 7.1. 2017. Available at: http:\/\/eucast.org\/fileadmin\/src\/media\/PDFs\/EUCAST_files\/Breakpoint_tables\/v_7.1_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf accessed July8 2019."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_9_1","first-page":"5500","article-title":"Scientific report of EFSA and ECDC. The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2017","volume":"16","author":"European Food Safety Authority","year":"2018","unstructured":"European Food Safety Authority. Scientific report of EFSA and ECDC. The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2017. EFSA J, 2018; 16:5500.","journal-title":"EFSA J"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2903\/j.efsa.2019.5598"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1541-4337.12007"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.10.042"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_13_1","unstructured":"International Organization for Standardization. ISO 20776-1:2007. Clinical Laboratory Testing and In Vitro Diagnostic Test Systems-Susceptibility Testing of Infectious Agents and Evaluation of Performance of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Devices-Part 1: Reference Method for Testing the In Vitro Activity of Antimicrobial Agents Against Rapidly Growing Aerobic Bacteria Involved in Infectious Diseases. Geneva Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization 2007."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/fpd.2017.2344"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3855\/jidc.3715"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3855\/jidc.5236"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.17221\/260\/2016-CJFS"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jfs.12314"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_20_1","unstructured":"Romanian Standards Association. SR EN ISO 6579\/2003 SR EN ISO 6579 AC\/2009. Microbiology of Food and Feeding Stuffs. Horizontal Method for the Detection of Salmonella spp. Bucharest Romania: Romanian Standard Association 2003."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_21_1","unstructured":"Romanian Standards Association. SR EN ISO 10272\/2006. Microbiology of Food and Feeding Stuffs. Horizontal Method for the Identification and Isolation of Campylobacter spp. 2006."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.12.014"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/fpd.2015.1946"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.12.010"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5604\/12321966.1235180"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.03.016"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4315\/0362-028X.JFP-14-460"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fmicb.2018.02104"}],"container-title":["Foodborne Pathogens and Disease"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1089\/fpd.2019.2738","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1089\/fpd.2019.2738","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1089\/fpd.2019.2738","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]],"date-time":"2026-04-29T06:23:36Z","timestamp":1777443816000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1089\/fpd.2019.2738"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,8]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1089\/fpd.2019.2738"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/fpd.2019.2738","relation":{},"ISSN":["1535-3141","1556-7125"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1535-3141","type":"print"},{"value":"1556-7125","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,8]]}}}