{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,4]],"date-time":"2026-05-04T06:49:57Z","timestamp":1777877397856,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":12,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,1]],"date-time":"2012-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1349049600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Public health programs that control mosquitoes and other disease vectors have the added benefit of reducing residents' exposure to pest insects. We surveyed homeowners in Madison, Wisconsin, and used an economic valuation method, stated-choice experiments, to measure willingness to pay (WTP) for control of West Nile virus (WNV)-transmitting and nuisance mosquitoes under current and increased levels of WNV risk. Under current WNV risk levels (approximately 1 in 250,000), the average Madison survey respondent was not willing to pay for programs that targeted West Nile-transmitting mosquitoes only (WTP=\u2212$21, 95% [CI \u2212$63, $20]), while WTP for a reduction in nuisance mosquitoes was substantial (WTP=$147, 95% [CI $109, $186]). As the risk of WNV was increased, WTP for control of disease-carrying mosquitoes also increased (WTP=$158; 95% CI [$111, $206] at the highest risk level), but WTP for nuisance control remained high (WTP=$108; 95% CI [$78, $138]). Among homeowners in our sample, the \u201cnuisance factor\u201d was more important than the \u201cdisease factor\u201d in terms of respondents' demand for mosquito control.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1089\/vbz.2011.0810","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,5,31]],"date-time":"2012-05-31T15:32:34Z","timestamp":1338478354000},"page":"886-892","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":44,"title":["Willingness to Pay for Mosquito Control: How Important Is West Nile Virus Risk Compared to the Nuisance of Mosquitoes?"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"12","author":[{"given":"Katherine","family":"Dickinson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"National Center for Atmospheric Research"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Susan","family":"Paskewitz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Wisconsin\u2013Madison"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_1","volume-title":"Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies: A Common Sense Approach to Theory and Practice","author":"Alberini A","year":"2010","unstructured":"Alberini A, , Longo A, , Veronesi M. Basic statistical models for stated choice studies. Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies: A Common Sense Approach to Theory and Practice. Kanninen B. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 2010."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/3147294"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10393-007-0152-y"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_5_1","volume-title":"Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies: A Common Sense Approach to Theory and Practice","author":"Johnson FR","year":"2010","unstructured":"Johnson FR, , Kanninen B, , Bingham M et al. Experimental design for stated choice studies. Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies: A Common Sense Approach to Theory and Practice. Kanninen B. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 2010."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jenvman.2007.05.015"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/hec.1193"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2987\/8756-971X(2005)21[201:LOEOBS]2.0.CO;2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4020-5753-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.37972.497234.44"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jenvman.2007.12.016"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_12_1","volume-title":"Stata Statistical Software: Release 11","author":"StataCorp","year":"2009","unstructured":"StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 11. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP, 2009."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.healthplace.2010.08.003"}],"container-title":["Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1089\/vbz.2011.0810","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1089\/vbz.2011.0810","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1089\/vbz.2011.0810","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,30]],"date-time":"2026-04-30T22:50:20Z","timestamp":1777589420000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1089\/vbz.2011.0810"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,10]]},"references-count":12,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1089\/vbz.2011.0810"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/vbz.2011.0810","relation":{},"ISSN":["1530-3667","1557-7759"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1530-3667","type":"print"},{"value":"1557-7759","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,10]]}}}